diff bw properties and auto implemented properties

Question

1.00/5 (1 vote)

See more:

Hi,

what is exactly happening in auto-implemented properties over properties?

According to my knowledge automated properties create backup fields to properties, if so how its happening?

Thanks

Posted 24-Sep-13 18:31pm

usha sri latha

Add a Solution

2 solutions

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Siva Hyderabad · Answer 1 · 2013-09-24T19:25:00

Solution 3

properity defines collection of set and get methods with body.....
but auto implemented properity defines set and get methods without body ...that's all

Posted 24-Sep-13 19:25pm

Siva Hyderabad

PIEBALDconsult · Answer 2 · 2013-09-24T18:44:00

Solution 1

The compiler does it.

Posted 24-Sep-13 18:44pm

PIEBALDconsult

Comments

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 25-Sep-13 0:51am

5ed. I recently answered in detail, but my answer was removed, as many others, due to abuse reports on the question.
I think this answer is just enough. :-)
—SA

usha sri latha 25-Sep-13 1:04am

yes compiler does it, means creation of backup fields for automated properties,in the case of properties not.

Is there any other difference

PIEBALDconsult 25-Sep-13 1:16am

In the immortal words of Bill Murray, "IT JUST DOESN"T MATTER".

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 25-Sep-13 1:22am

There are no differences. You can write strictly equivalent types with auto-implemented and explicitly implemented property with trivial (no side effect) getter, setter, or both.
—SA