|
Metro UI - I like it
Always Keep Smiling.
Yours Pankaj Nikam
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unque wrote:
It is awesome
It definitely is
Always Keep Smiling.
Yours Pankaj Nikam
|
|
|
|
|
have you seen google's office?
i never seen a better work environement
and seems a very various and "new technology aware" team
|
|
|
|
|
but the poll is not that..?!
|
|
|
|
|
oooops
i missed the how "taste" was meant
anyway i don't like metro style and fb,
i don't get which particular style have both amazon and intel ?!?
let me confirm google :P
|
|
|
|
|
If Apple is in vote choices, Samsung has to be one of them...
Bekir Sait
|
|
|
|
|
then why not motorola,nokia, lg and kyocera .. .
|
|
|
|
|
I was looking on the list for Samsung too...
- Life is a fountain
|
|
|
|
|
|
_beauw_ wrote: I'd suggest Texas Instruments as well... TI gave us a brushed aluminum,
single-unit PC with good graphics and sound long before there was an IBM PC.
And not to forget the TMS-9900 CPU, probably the only 16 bit CPU that was outgunned by an 8 bit CPU (Commodore's 6510!) at a lower clock frequency
But sure, it had a nice case. At least something to look at while you are waiting.
At least artificial intelligence already is superior to natural stupidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do remember it to be a decent computer for that time, but, as I have read, the processor only had a minimal set of internal registers and used a structure in memory instead. That accounted for additional bus cycles to read and write those 'registers' in each instruction. It really was not very fast, especially for a 16 bit CPU.
At least artificial intelligence already is superior to natural stupidity
|
|
|
|
|
guess that's explains Apple's market share with so many us M$ developer still thinks like this
dev
|
|
|
|
|
A very valid point. Even i know many MS developers working in MS technologies for more than a decade but are blind Apple aficionados.
Every now and then say, "What the Elephant." "What the Elephant" gives you freedom. Freedom brings opportunity. Opportunity makes your future.
|
|
|
|
|
...it's clearly Danske Slagterier[^]
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from Nexus Q, what other thing Google had made had some design which is not copying Microsoft or Apple's design?
modified 6-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
But all that was refreshing about google.com has been done back in 2000...
modified 6-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
well, i didn't vote for them. but they do have a design style (gmail, picassa, docs, etc.). some people like it, apparently.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably because they didn't want apple to win. I can understand that...
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
go Google!!!
|
|
|
|
|
google.com
And, about copying "apple's design": would that be the one Apple stole from Xerox back in the 1980s?
It's all really about the best tool for the job and that is a personal thing.
Relative to google.com, "bing" just doesn't - but that's only my opinion.
Apple always has (and probably always will) impeded me as a user - be it cell-phone or computer.
Microsoft has [some of the time] assisted me as a user. Nokia normally assists me as a user.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe we have a different understanding of the poll. The world "taste" for me switched the question away from usability and towards more subjective "artistic" choice. I was thinking of things like aero, metro, the metal chrome of OSX, animations, the lines of an iPod or a Surface.
modified 6-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
fpnzmarksh wrote: would that be the one Apple stole from Xerox back in the 1980s?
the same one Microsoft stole from Apple back in the 90s, right?
|
|
|
|