|
Well .net 3.5 is .net 2.0 + (WPF,WCF,WF,LINQ ...)
|
|
|
|
|
yassir hannoun wrote: Well .net 3.5 is .net 2.0 + (WPF,WCF,WF,LINQ ...)
No, you're wrong.
.NET 3.0 = .NET 2.0 + WPF + WCF + WF + Cardspace
then .NET 3.5 = .NET 3.0 + .NET 3.0 SP1 + LINQ
Eriawan
|
|
|
|
|
well .net 3.5 is an update to 3.0
|
|
|
|
|
yassir hannoun wrote: well .net 3.5 is an update to 3.0
I'm afraid it's not exactly that way.
If you say, .NET 3.5 is a new update of .NET 3.0 because of LINQ, you're correct. But it's just LINQ and Addins (in System.Addin), and not anything else.
If you look at the documentation of .NET 3.5 class libraries, it's clearly stated that enhancements in many 3.0 pillars such as WPF, for example the included support of 2D on 3D, is available on .NET 3.0 SP1.
For a nice example, read this Viewport2DVisual3D documentation on online MSDN library:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613588.aspx[^]
It's clearly stated that it's supported on .NET 3.0 SP1 and 3.5. Which means, it's available since .NET 3.0 SP1.
The only new minor enhancements on WPF in .NET 3.5 are two: the XBAP support for Firefox and few localization languages. Nothing more.
It's true that this can cause confusions, since some classes on .NET 3.5 (not just WPF, some WCF and Workflow) are also available on .NET 3.0 SP1.
The original release .NET 3.0 SP1 can be downloaded separately. You can search it on Microsoft download page, enter ".NET 3.0 SP1" as keyword.
I hope this gives cleans explanations.
|
|
|
|
|
I thik that the best for Windows application is not using .NET. Because there is many companies that still using Win2k and don't using WUS or SUS. (I was working in company where 40% of employees using Office 97 and it's completely satisfy their needs)
For developers i think 3.5 will be better because there is many new encantments WPF,LINQ etc.
And who is you end users?
Wormhole is the God divided by zero
|
|
|
|
|
You can run .NET 2.0 on W2K.
"What's everyone so worked up about? So there's a comet -- big deal. It'll burn up in our atmosphere and what's ever left will be no bigger than a chihuahua's head." - Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
|
.NET 2.0 is still the most popular one at this moment. It is hard to say which one is the best. It depends on what functionality you are targeting.
TOMZ_KV
|
|
|
|
|
Infact 3.0 and 3.5 uses .net 2.0 CLR
It is not about whihc is the best it is about which one full filed your needs with minimum of requirement on the server.
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 used the 2.0 CLR, 3 was just add-ons. 3.5 uses it's own CLR.
"Listen, and listen well. I really like the band N-Sync. My favorite member is Harpo. I think there's a Harpo. If not there should be. I will write their next hit, maybe 'A boom-boom chiky chiky boom-boom a boom-boom chiky chaka chaka cho cho.' By the way, you must beware of Betty's iron claw. They are sharp, and they hurt. And beware his song about big butts, he beats people up while he plays it! " - Master Tang (from Kung Pow: Enter the Fist)
|
|
|
|
|
The Dogcow Farmer wrote: 3.0 used the 2.0 CLR,
This is right.
The Dogcow Farmer wrote: 3 was just add-ons. 3.5 uses it's own CLR.
This is absolutely wrong.
.NET 3.5 is sitting on top of .NET 2.0, since it only adds LINQ and System.AddIn and it contains .NET 3.0 SP1, and .NET 3.0 SP1 has .NET 2.0, and the CLR of all of these 3 releases is simply CLR 2.0.
Please read this blog entry of Microsoft's Somasegar:
http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/05/18/601354.aspx[^]
|
|
|
|
|
.Net Compact Framework comes in 1.0, 2.0 and 3.5 versions
So, assigning just one option is not fair. I think it shouldn't be included in the list and be evaluated in a separate survey.
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
At work its still 2.0, however at home 3.5 (i'm a contractor.. gotta keep the skills up )
|
|
|
|
|
I target all of them. With a gun.
So more like "aim".
|
|
|
|
|
Member 4134890 wrote: I target all of them. With a gun.
I bet they are moving too fast.
|
|
|
|
|
.NET? Moving too fast? Hell yes...
*goes back to his C++ code*
|
|
|
|
|
That's y go back to c.Cool same loops, same things year after year
|
|
|
|
|
Member 4134890 wrote: .NET? Moving too fast? Hell yes
yeah 5 versions(+ service packs) in 7 years
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 or higher is the way to go. 3.5 if the people have it. 1.1 or lower is like being stuck in Visual Basic 1.0 for DOS.
"What's everyone so worked up about? So there's a comet -- big deal. It'll burn up in our atmosphere and what's ever left will be no bigger than a chihuahua's head." - Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 seems to leak as much as that mess of 1.1 really did.
The problem is with the word: seems.
It is actually the impact it has, by-design.
Oh, my, days..
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't the list be in some logical order?
|
|
|
|
|
The order of the list seems to be the ranking of the answers, as they are the same. I think I would prefer that the list pre-vote should not show up in the order of the voting just because knowing ahead of time what is ranked higher may affect someone's vote on some things.
Then again, maybe the order is just coincidentally the same!
|
|
|
|
|
... but expect to switch to 8.0 soon
|
|
|
|
|
Good for you! I'm glad someone is out there, living on the edge, developing dangerously!
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire!
Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)!
SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0
0 rows returned
Save an Orange - Use the VCF!
VCF Blog
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Crafton wrote: Good for you! I'm glad someone is out there, living on the edge, developing dangerously!
I don't even write code anymore. I just stare at the IDE and it gets written for me.
|
|
|
|