|
You can run .NET 2.0 on W2K.
"What's everyone so worked up about? So there's a comet -- big deal. It'll burn up in our atmosphere and what's ever left will be no bigger than a chihuahua's head." - Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
|
.NET 2.0 is still the most popular one at this moment. It is hard to say which one is the best. It depends on what functionality you are targeting.
TOMZ_KV
|
|
|
|
|
Infact 3.0 and 3.5 uses .net 2.0 CLR
It is not about whihc is the best it is about which one full filed your needs with minimum of requirement on the server.
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 used the 2.0 CLR, 3 was just add-ons. 3.5 uses it's own CLR.
"Listen, and listen well. I really like the band N-Sync. My favorite member is Harpo. I think there's a Harpo. If not there should be. I will write their next hit, maybe 'A boom-boom chiky chiky boom-boom a boom-boom chiky chaka chaka cho cho.' By the way, you must beware of Betty's iron claw. They are sharp, and they hurt. And beware his song about big butts, he beats people up while he plays it! " - Master Tang (from Kung Pow: Enter the Fist)
|
|
|
|
|
The Dogcow Farmer wrote: 3.0 used the 2.0 CLR,
This is right.
The Dogcow Farmer wrote: 3 was just add-ons. 3.5 uses it's own CLR.
This is absolutely wrong.
.NET 3.5 is sitting on top of .NET 2.0, since it only adds LINQ and System.AddIn and it contains .NET 3.0 SP1, and .NET 3.0 SP1 has .NET 2.0, and the CLR of all of these 3 releases is simply CLR 2.0.
Please read this blog entry of Microsoft's Somasegar:
http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/05/18/601354.aspx[^]
|
|
|
|
|
.Net Compact Framework comes in 1.0, 2.0 and 3.5 versions
So, assigning just one option is not fair. I think it shouldn't be included in the list and be evaluated in a separate survey.
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
At work its still 2.0, however at home 3.5 (i'm a contractor.. gotta keep the skills up )
|
|
|
|
|
I target all of them. With a gun.
So more like "aim".
|
|
|
|
|
Member 4134890 wrote: I target all of them. With a gun.
I bet they are moving too fast.
|
|
|
|
|
.NET? Moving too fast? Hell yes...
*goes back to his C++ code*
|
|
|
|
|
That's y go back to c.Cool same loops, same things year after year
|
|
|
|
|
Member 4134890 wrote: .NET? Moving too fast? Hell yes
yeah 5 versions(+ service packs) in 7 years
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 or higher is the way to go. 3.5 if the people have it. 1.1 or lower is like being stuck in Visual Basic 1.0 for DOS.
"What's everyone so worked up about? So there's a comet -- big deal. It'll burn up in our atmosphere and what's ever left will be no bigger than a chihuahua's head." - Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 seems to leak as much as that mess of 1.1 really did.
The problem is with the word: seems.
It is actually the impact it has, by-design.
Oh, my, days..
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't the list be in some logical order?
|
|
|
|
|
The order of the list seems to be the ranking of the answers, as they are the same. I think I would prefer that the list pre-vote should not show up in the order of the voting just because knowing ahead of time what is ranked higher may affect someone's vote on some things.
Then again, maybe the order is just coincidentally the same!
|
|
|
|
|
... but expect to switch to 8.0 soon
|
|
|
|
|
Good for you! I'm glad someone is out there, living on the edge, developing dangerously!
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire!
Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)!
SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0
0 rows returned
Save an Orange - Use the VCF!
VCF Blog
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Crafton wrote: Good for you! I'm glad someone is out there, living on the edge, developing dangerously!
I don't even write code anymore. I just stare at the IDE and it gets written for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Chuck Norris? Why did you change your name? ![Wink | ;)](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/smiley_wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bloody Mac users....
regards,
Paul Watson
Ireland & South Africa
Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote: At least he achieved immortality for a few years.
|
|
|
|
|
Good one.
|
|
|
|
|
In Framework 3.5, i find the datatype "var" especially in LINQ samples, does this mean we are going back to the good old (or bad old) days of Visual Basic VB6 and earlier when any and every variable was of type Object.
I have been involved in converting some VB6 apps to .NET and its been a tough job finding out the actual datatype and moreover you cannot use the handy Property Browser facility.
|
|
|
|