|
I agree!
let's code the internet in c#
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
is it broke again?
it is 8 letters and 4 letters
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
That's a horrible hint!
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: horrible hint
Indeed
But let Hobby confirm it, as he expected us to "Have fun with it"
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if my maths isn't that bad
you get 0B 5W
Actually sorry for the long delay didn't know this was a try ?!
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: sorry for the long delay didn't know this was a try ?! That's ok. But well done rendering my pattern matching code totally unusable by setting a (8, 4) clue. I have written it to match only a single word.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
That is why we implemented the mastermind rules.
Agent__007 wrote: But well done rendering my pattern matching code totally unusable
I'm glad i could help
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: I'm glad i could help Sehr rücksichtslos.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Aber mit Liebe
Agent__007 wrote: Sehr rücksichtslos.
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be the instrument they use to hypnotize you
HobbyProggy wrote: It looks beautiful when you see it
Well, yeah they are. At least the ones I've seen so far.
But I just don't know what's the exact word used for THAT thing.
|
|
|
|
|
"Possibly Pink" may be ??
As "It looks beautiful when you see it, you said
|
|
|
|
|
Pink is beautiful?! Are you a girl?
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Yes. I'm a girl
|
|
|
|
|
Brittle1618 wrote: Well, Yes. I'm a girl Well, then "Pink is beautiful" makes a perfect sense.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
But I don't really like pink that much.
Said that phrase cause it's a common perception that pink is beautiful
Yeah, It is a kinda beautiful but not as much as black is. Black is classy and deep at the same time
|
|
|
|
|
nope sadly not correct
4W
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
SHOOTING STAR
For some reason the clue reminds me of a fish caught on a fisherman's line?
|
|
|
|
|
Don't remember when and where it was caught. But it reminded me of a fish, too
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats on that!
you are up tomorrow
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Closed after shredded capes initially taped loosely enough were used for exploration (5, 7)
Probably a bit easy, but have fun anyways
|
|
|
|
|
Space shuttle ?
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
It's obvious once you pointed it out...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
It often is
|
|
|
|
|
That's right. You're up tomorrow
|
|
|
|
|
Since I have got the options to have custom tags/attributes that can do wonders, I am in a phase to decide which to use (and in what situation) in normal line of business application. Assuming that I have flexibility to choose either architecture to build web app.
Tag helpers or Angular Directives? I, personally, would not like to mix both in same application.
Some parameters I am considering:
1. Security: Risk of leaking out by business logic even if it is UI related business logic.
2. Client side vs server side: code execution, caching result of custom tag (if feasible), data binding.
3. Performance: Load time, execution time, memory taken in server as well as browser.
4. Flexibility: watching change in my custom tag and providing dynamic behavior accordingly.
5. Logging and Exception handling: Should log to a persistence storage if exception occurred.
6. Modularity/Portability: I should be able to port my directives/taghelpers to other apps easily with single copy of source code (let version control handle other things).
7. Customization: Any custom needs should be derived from my native directive/tag helpers.
8. Features and community support.
9. <Add your parameter here>...
Requesting to share your opinion on a scale of 10 against each parameter. I know all parameters can be handled properly in both technologies, but, Which one would you prefer and why?
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|