|
It's much harder and more expensive to set up on your own these days, particularly if you're on your own. You need a pretty well paying job to support it and those are not common.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: there have been lots of problems with the build.
Just fix the errors, ignore the warnings. You'll be fine for a while.
|
|
|
|
|
The error was that my house is apparently being build in a swamp... The whole block sank a few millimeters into the ground cracking some walls etc.
They fixed it, but then it happened again
Don't know much about that though. I'll be hearing more next week.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you build in a swamp
Sometimes you have to sink pilings down until you hit something solid, or build the whole thing on a big raft, to provide a stable base to build on. I'd prefer just building in the right place to start with
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it isn't literally a swamp. Except for the fact that the new row of houses sunk in the ground. Maybe it's quicksand. And of course we're talking about millimeters...
|
|
|
|
|
I recently moved and, although I was just in a rented flat with really hardly any stuff, it's still amazing how much accumulates in three years. Moving was difficult enough and I ended up throwing away a lot of things that I never quite got around to doing that with before. I'm sure next time (I bought my current place so I'm getting furniture and plan to be there a while) it will be much worse. So I can imagine how much stuff you have over 25 years.
Actually I can do more than imagine as I know how much stuff there was to sort out from my grandparents' houses when they died (after about 25 years there in both cases).
|
|
|
|
|
I dream of a house with a huge basement (that's not common in the Netherlands, we already live below sea level as it is!) or attic where I can store stuff indefinitly
And of course I'd never need to move.
|
|
|
|
|
Most houses here have a pretty big space in the roof to stash stuff and forget about it for 30 years. That's dangerous if you ever do move though, it's a pain to clear out.
|
|
|
|
|
Meshuggah is yiddish for crazy or insane, and a fitting description of Thomas Haake, the drummer in the band with that name.
While Progressive Metal isn't my style I can't help being anything but impressed[^].
An upvote to the first one getting the reference 23/16 without cheating. (not that hard)
|
|
|
|
|
23/16 is the time signature in which he plays. Probably he does that a few times while the first guitar player plays 423876/123485 and the second plays 239846/12459 and then the singer just sings 4/4 and after 2.463 rounds they meet up and are synchronous again. That's what I think they do anyway
Great band.
|
|
|
|
|
Have an upvote.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeshhhhhh!
Believe it or not, but that upvote really is the highlight of my day so far and it's 10 pm / 22:00 over here
|
|
|
|
|
Well I meant that upvote not just for the promise I made, but you made me laugh because there really is more than one time signature in the tune. well, I don't know about the guitars but figuratively you're spot on.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Well I meant that upvote not just for the promise I made, but you made me laugh In that case I demand another upvote!
Jörgen Andersson wrote: there really is more than one time signature in the tune I remember reading an interview with those guys back when that album (ObZen) was released.
They really do play different time signatures and they play them at the same time.
The drummer plays it four or five times, throws in an off-time signature, and they all finish at the same time.
He also plays sixth and fourth notes in the same count. With his feet. That guy is unreal!
modified 24-Mar-14 18:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: In that case I demand another upvote! We are sorry, but, your request is denied: requests for extra up-votes must be filed before midnight GMT+07.
We cordially invite you to consider this action on our part has nothing to do with you, specifically, qua person, but is simply the standard inscrutably infernal machinations of an impersonal bureaucratic system implemented with the latest in artificial intelligence algorithms.
This offer may be void in your state; local laws and regulations may apply.
If there is any other way we can assist you, please enjoy using our support system, again.
“Use the word 'cybernetics,' Norbert, because nobody knows what it means. This will always put you at an advantage in arguments.” Claude Shannon (Information Theory scientist): letter to Norbert Weiner of M.I.T., circa 1940
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Bill, you made me: so an upvote for you!
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature">
<first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last>
</sig>
|
|
|
|
|
Frustrations about customer support?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, don't bother about Bill, he's in the wrong timezone. Have another one.
|
|
|
|
|
Whooohooo, I'm on a roll! No one can stop me now! I am invincible!
Coming very close to 100k too
|
|
|
|
|
Farpotshket from Yiddish:
"Something that is all fouled up, especially as the result of attempts to fix it–repeatedly; making something worse while trying to fix it." [^].
Oh, I know that Demon well: it surfaces too often in code I have written, and re-written !
“Use the word 'cybernetics,' Norbert, because nobody knows what it means. This will always put you at an advantage in arguments.” Claude Shannon (Information Theory scientist): letter to Norbert Weiner of M.I.T., circa 1940
|
|
|
|
|
The german Translation i´d suggest is:
"Verschlimmbesserung"
|
|
|
|
|
Surfaces in a lot of areas for me!
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
FUBAR.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a word for that in English as well: "DIY"
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
The Yiddish word for 'refactoring'.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|