|
Awful!
I have of course stolen it!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice
|
|
|
|
|
What happens to those that does not catch her eye?
Does it cause her an eye sore?
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
I think she blindly ignores them, as they don't see eye to eye.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Guess she does not believe in going on a blind date then?
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
CBadger wrote: Does it cause her an eye sore?
No, the eye just keeps soaring.
|
|
|
|
|
At least she can keep an eye on something so far away a normal person will not be able to see it
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Does anybody know a tool which simulates a touchscreen in Windows 7? I develop an app in VS 2010 and cannot modify a codebase, so neither multitouchvista nor VS 2012's "Microsoft Windows Simulator Touch Emulation" are good for me.
I suppose that some kind of a low-level simulation would most accurate.
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^] you go.
(Hey, it's the Lounge. What did you expect?)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Hey, it's the Lounge. What did you expect? Close enough.
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
Here you go. This is actually useful
Answer
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Mr Obvious. I know how to use google.
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
Jacek Gajek wrote: Thank you,
It is my pleasure sir
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
my
Undoubtely.
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
Jacek Gajek wrote: Does anybody know a tool which simulates a touchscreen in Windows 7?
Yes, I believe it is called the "Windows 8 upgrade".
Windows 8 is the resurrected version of Microsoft Bob. The only thing missing is the Fisher-Price logo.
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on the common whiteboard at work:
Make all of the equations true by inserting as many mathematical symbols as needed, but no numbers.
0 0 0 = 6
1 1 1 = 6
2 2 2 = 6
3 3 3 = 6
4 4 4 = 6
5 5 5 = 6
7 7 7 = 6
8 8 8 = 6
9 9 9 = 6
Yes, they can all be solved for equality. What are you solutions?
|
|
|
|
|
(0!+0!+0!)! = 6
(1+1+1)! = 6
2+2+2 = 6
(3*3)-3 = 6
4+4-√4 = 6
5+(5/5) =6
7-(7/7) = 6
8-√8+√√8 = 6 +++WRONG!
9-√√(9*9) = 6
[edit]Forgot brackets in first one, and got 8 8 8 completely wrong! √8 != 4...[/edit]
[edit2]And forgot the exclamations marks in the first one - I need more caffeine...[/edit2]
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
See below for where you're wrong (0 and 8), and stupid me for the 9's
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed the 0 and 8 as I pressed the "post" button. Then corrected 0 badly and noticed again as I pressed post button...
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: (0!+0!+0!)! = 6
Why not (0+0+0)!=6 ?
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Because != is a logical operation, not a mathematical one and thus against the strict letter of the question.
Otherwise it becomes trivial:
0+0+0 != 6
1+1+1 != 6
2+2+2 = 6
3+3+3 != 6
4+4+4 != 6
5+5+5 != 6
6+6+6 != 6
7+7+7 != 6
8+8+8 != 6
9+9+9 != 6
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
rofl! You are right.
I'm an interpreter. I stopped at line one.
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Zero factorial is 1 is it? (Well it is apparently) but how the hell that works I don't know. A bit like light being a particle and a wave *at the same time*. I reckon they just make it up.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
(0!+0!+0!)! = 6
(1+1+1)! = 6
2+2+2 = 6
(3*3)-3 = 6
√(4*4)+√4 = 6
5+(5/5) = 6
7-(7/7) = 6
8-√√(8+8) = 6
√(9*9)-√9 = 6
[edit] Fixed 4 and 8, and added 9
speramus in juniperus
modified 13-Sep-13 8:03am.
|
|
|
|