|
Your pee-pee wasn't being self-deprecating; it was ashamed.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If you think about it, brain named itself.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Insect, mammal, sports equipment! (7, 3)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure about this one, but "Cricket Bat"? 
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
And we have a winner! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I would (not seriously) have said this:
Insect: Ant
Mammal: Rat
Sports equipment: Axe (at least if you are a Viking)
And the solution then somehow could be: Anthraxe
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted a cricket based one, after the supposedly cricket related jobbie yesterday.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
How is this within the BBC's remit?
On whose authority is license-payers' money being spent on something that has nothing whatsoever to do with the BBC?
Yes, it's all very nice that kids will be getting tech skills, but the BBC is not a private enterprise, which can spend its profits on things like this; it is a non-profit organisation, paid for from the pockets of people who own televisions, and all the money it receives is meant to go into TV programming, not the other kind.
And is it just me who, given recent confirmation of long-standing suspicions, sees this "inroad to direct contact with small children" as something that I don't want BBC employees to have?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I used to be a big supporter of the BBC a few years back, but they're so biased and (I suspect) heavily influenced by "external interests" that I think their time is up. You certainly can't trust BBC news these days.
Of course, they'll cling onto the license fee pushing the "public broadcaster" line for as long as possible. I'm sure it'll be messy and undignified in the end.
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Would you rather rely on Sky News? Going the way of Fox in the US of A.
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
If a function in your app is not working right, you say "this needs to be fixed", not "there are bits in other people's apps that work worse".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
It's all the same thing. Vested interests.
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a look at the BBC charter, and the Agreement[^] which effectively says what it can and cannot do, you will see in the section entitled THE BBC’S PUBLIC PURPOSES the following:
7. Promoting education and learning
In developing (and reviewing) the purpose remit for promoting education and learning,
the Trust must, amongst other things, seek to ensure that the BBC—
(a) stimulates interest in, and knowledge of, a full range of subjects and issues through
content that is accessible and can encourage either formal or informal learning; and
(b) provides specialist educational content and accompanying material to facilitate
learning at all levels and for all ages.
As far as I can see, the promotion of programming skills would fall under this.
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
modified 13-Mar-15 6:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember the good old OU educational programmes on BBC2 and the thousands of documentary and science programmes I've watched that have been produced by the BBC, these were all great.
But that's in the past, the modern "education" (nu-education?) is highly questionably and unbelievably biased. The BBC has (again, in my opinion) been bent all out of shape.
The millions it receives every year from the EU alone (read: foreign nations) should be ringing alarm bells.
Now that's fine if it wants to take foreign money to push a certain agenda, but in that case I shouldn't be legally forced to pay for them as well. The BBC should be forced to choose who it serves and be funded appropriately.
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
"specialist educational content and accompanying material" does not mean distributing millions of pounds' worth of computer equipment.
- "specialist educational content" means audio/visual content of TV/radio shows, which it hardly provides, any more, compared to what it used to provide.
- "accompanying material" means printed/printable matter to go with the content of the TV/radio shows.
Don't play the shyster, looking for loopholes that they can use to do whatever the **** they like. Their remit is very, very clear, and it does not include setting up computer-hardware or child-grooming empires.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Can I hear an axe being ground?
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
Against shysters? sure. A planeload at the bottom of the ocean isn't a good enough start.
Against the BBC? No. They've proven their worth, over the past few years. I just give credit where it's due.
Plus, they did bad things with their previous foray into the computer-hardware world, and they don't belong there.
If they want to get involved, they should make shows that teach kids what they need to know. That's their job, not glory-hunting at the taxpayers' expense.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: "accompanying material" means printed/printable matter to go with the content of the TV/radio shows.
what - so they shouldn't have an internet presence either, I suppose?
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not here to give lessons on how to print web pages that contain "accompanying material".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Quite apart from the fact that it is my license money they are spending is that even their Red Button pages describe it as being like a Raspberry Pi. So why create another item when the RPi is sufficiently similar and part of the RPi philosophy was to excite young people in the same way that the BBC Micro did in the 1980s? In summary, the BBC seem to be creating a device that emulates a device that emulates a device that they originally were responsible for.
|
|
|
|
|
And the BBC Micro was also completely unnecessary; there were plenty of companies making microcomputers that the kids (i.e. me, at the time) could use.
All they did with the BBC Micro was spend taxpayers' money to take profit away from companies like Sinclair and Amstrad, give all the resultant money away to celebs and in bonuses for BBC execs, then drop the whole thing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: there were plenty of companies making microcomputers that the kids (i.e. me, at the time) could use
Not when the Beeb was being created, there weren't. And each computer was different, so adding programming about all the different computers coming onto the market (and at the time the Beeb was being produced, they were all crap)_ would have been too hard - having a 'standard' machine to talk about was important because the Beeb could then talk about that machine in particular - because they could never have made a show about computing on (e.g.) the Amstrad or Spectrum because their coverage would have to be balanced (and, again, they didn't exist at teh time the Beeb was being produced)
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
What on Earth are you talking about?
Have you been Googling wikipedia pages, again?
The Spectrum ZX80 was discontinued before the BBC Micro was even released! And the ZX81 was released almost a year before the BBC, AIRI (I got my ZX81 in July, for my birthday, a few months after it had been released, and the BBC wasn't available until the following Christmas).
The technology wasn't waiting for the BBC to come along and be the hero!
They were not needed; all they did was take money from everyone but Acorn (which it vastly underpaid), and give large amounts of it to people who had nothing to do with computing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Ah! The famous spectrum zx80!
Sinclair and acorn both tendered for making the BBC.
The spectrum would have been the BBC but it was a sh*t toy, not an expandable computer
I am trolling o. The sh*t toy front - just taste of your own medicine stuff
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
