Welcome to the Lounge

megaadam wrote:

foo();
Is indeed incompatible with void foo()

The first is implicitly int foo() according to the C language standard!

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

megaadam wrote:

function01();
Is indeed incompatible with void function01()

The first is implicitly int function01() according to the C language standard!

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Quote:

// a bit of stuff for the test
function01 ();//line XXX
// not much more

void foo()
{
  function01 ();//line XXX
}

function01 ();//line XXX

#pragma once

inline void function01()
{
	// something
}

#pragma once

#include "inline.h"

#include "main.h"

int main()
{
}

function01();

E0311 cannot overload functions distinguished by return type alone -> inline.h 3
E0260 explicit type is missing ('int' assumed)                     -> main.cpp 7

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote:

#include "main.h"

int main()
{
function01(); // line XXX
}

function01();

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.