|
Hi, article 'Technical guide on c and related topics' was published however due to serious comments it was closed and I accidentally ended up closing my account. However, now that I have reopened my account with different membership number, and also posted modified article (by closing all comments to previous article) which has been once again published. However, the old article still exists as 'closed' and appears when googled.
So how to get rid of this old article link?
|
|
|
|
|
Could you post the link please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've killed it. The link in Google doesn't take you to the article now.
|
|
|
|
|
I have started writing an article and I have saved it as a draft. When I try to "preview" it. I get weird tags for one link and looks good for another link.
BTW, both link refers to same article.
Works fine:
Protected Access Modifier
Issue:
Protected Access Modifier
I am not sure how to resolve this. Any help is appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. The link you mentioned is the one I am working with
|
|
|
|
|
I just needed to ask regarding editing the approved article.
I want to update/edit my article (approved) as there was a mistake pointed out by a member. My question is if I edit it, doest it go back to moderation queue and starts from fresh or not?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: if I edit it, doest it go back to moderation queue and starts from fresh or not?
It goes back into the moderation queue.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Or user trying to do something wrong?
I notized that this now closed article[^] was being always locked for edition. A bit curiosity made me click on revisions. I find the list[^] a bit odd.
Is that normal? (I am not reporting a bug... at least not yet, I am just curious)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Also reported here[^] and here[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, thanks. I should have taken a look into B&S
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-ewington
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=158589&aid=873881[^] is having problems with the format and (on the same time) there is no message board (we already spoke about it) to tell it to the owner
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The dev team is aware of the issue, now I think it is just a matter of prioritizing that issue amongst the others. In the meantime, I have fixed the formatting on that fella.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thank you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Managed Media Aggregation using Rtsp and Rtp[^]
The only thing I know is... I don't want / consider it necessary to be reported.
My point is the almost full page of explanation about his dog and how he passed away. I have left him a comment with my opinion, but I would like to know yours.
To be honest, I would change it edit it myself. But I don't know if that would be too rude and (on the other hand) I have never used the article editor yet and I would not like to create a mess.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
a tough one - while its long, I'd leave it as is - we as human beings are the sum of our experiences, so, we know a little more about what makes the author tick - and he's a little more human to us - space is cheap
on other sites he'd get made to cut that out and put it in a blog - but Im constantly reminded we 'are not other sites' when I look at the brutality of 'SO' for example
|
|
|
|
|
While I have some sympathy for the author, that information does not belong in an article. He should be encouraged to remove it, but if he really wants it publicised then the Lounge is the place, as others have done in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
I told this guy[^] to merge some tips (the 4 about genetic algorithms)[^] into an article.
He has done it. Making the tips not needed anymore. He didn't delete them.
My question is... in such a case. What is the right way to manage it?
Is it something that a Protector can / should delete? Or only staff? Or leave it as it is?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw this 'evolution' - I'd just leave the tips - anyone with a short concentration span can still go back and read the tips one by one as they need/want to consume more
|
|
|
|
|
How to remove html tags from codeproject editor ? when i preview my article so its show article along with tags .
|
|
|
|
|
In case you want to use HTML for your article, you should click on the button in the editor to switch to HTML mode, and you can enter HTML there. I suspect that you wrote HTML in the WYSIWYG editor, you can try to copy the HTML to the "Source mode".
If the above is not the case, can you please provide a link to your article?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
I am Sibeesh Venu, I had an account with code project and I was very active . I was spending almost 10 hours daily here . Unfortunately few of my article content was reported by team. So my previous account got banned. Now I understood the mistakes what I have done. I felt very sad at that time. I missed Code Project a lot, So now I have created an another account. Is there anyway I can create the article which are approved by team again which I wrote with my previous account? Please help me. Thanks in advance
Kindest Regards
Sibeesh
http://sibeeshpassion.com/[^]
==================!!!====================!!!========================
So much complexity in software comes from trying to make one thing do two things.
Kindest Regards
Sibeesh
http://sibeeshpassion.com/
modified 4-Feb-15 5:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
Whats was the reason for your article being reported? If you have local copies, you can still upload your article but make sure you are not doing the same mistake for your account to be banned again?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
OK I will upload the articles which were approved by the ream again. Thank you for your reply .
Kindest Regards
Sibeesh
http://sibeeshpassion.com/[^]
==================!!!====================!!!========================
So much complexity in software comes from trying to make one thing do two things.
Kindest Regards
Sibeesh
http://sibeeshpassion.com/
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
