|
Could I suggest the S5[^] instead? Much, much nicer.
(My current toy de jour)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Tricky to get a decent reception with it though.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll go and give something a big kick.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Go here[^] (codeproject forum). Gives me page 130. Click the previous page, using the link at the bottom labelled "129". Brings me to the first page on the forum 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Gives me page 130
For me, it gives page 66.
[EDIT]
It shows 66 for me, because I prefer 50 messages per page. Changed "Per page" into 25, and it gives me page 131. I clicked on 130 and 129, but it didn't bring me to the first page.
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: For me, it gives page 66.
That just means that yours is bigger than mine. Or running at a higher resolution
At the bottom of the forum, there's links to other pages in the forum; a page-selector thingy. What happens if you click the link that says "65"? Where does that navigate to?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Or running at a higher resolution
No, I prefer 50 messages per page, when I changed the messages per page to 25, it gives page 131.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: What happens if you click the link that says "65"?
Then it navigates me to page 65, not to the first page.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I'm too stupid to see it, but I was just writing an article for about an hour. Finally I was clicking on "contributor's agreement" to see what I'm accepting. It was shown in the same browser window. After clicking back, the article was gone!!! Work of an hour, F*** !!! Maybe, the makers of this page did not expect people to actually click on that link ... Or they don't mind people losing their work ... Sorry for being that sarcastic, but I'm really annoyed!
Here's the suggestion: Please, please make that link show up in a separate window so that the original one (the one with the article) keeps untouched. Or - instead of a simple link - make a postback, safe the article in the session and then branch to the new page.
Btw.: I noticed the buttons "Save Draft" and "Discard draft" right to the article. In between there is "Saved xxx minutes ago". The latter implies for me, that the article was auto-saved. Was it? So why can't I get it back?
|
|
|
|
|
Just go back to the submit page[^] and you'll see a list of your drafts.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the hint, but there is nothing. It's blank. It seems, it saved the version after I returned and I just had deleted parts of the template to start over again. Maybe it normally works that way and I made something unusual, though I am not aware of anything I could have done unusual.
|
|
|
|
|
I've looked in the database and can't find the Draft version. I'm stumped for ideas here.
1. If you'd hit "back" and the page was still populated with your article content, an auto save would continue to be created. You should be good to go (but aren't).
2. If you hit "back" and nothing was there then a new article would have started, since it would have lost the connection to your old (draft) article. I'd expect to see two drafts under your name, yet I only see one empty draft (as well as this article[^])
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Insider News seems to be a hotbed for weirdness. I have seen images, random characters, that, and a few other things there.
Gryphons Are Awesome! Gryphons Are Awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typically it means that Someone at your IP address has already voted for that item.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the reply.
So, from one IP only one person can vote ?
Why we have IP check ? Is there any specific reason ?
Thanks,
Tadit
|
|
|
|
|
Starting from yesterday, "Latest reputation events" window shows only growth, but the summary figure at the profile page goes down gradually, step by step, by some couple of thousands since last evening. Is it some bug which was introduced recently? If it was in one step, I would guess it was yet another renormalization of point counting... Will you check it up?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
When CP detects someone types his message in CAPS-LOCK, there should be either be a popup warning, or a automatic uncapsify done on the text.
just something simple, put caps on first word of sentence (first word of a paragraph, first word after a . )
Nihil obstat
|
|
|
|
|
T.H.A.T.I.S.A.R.E.A.L.G.O.O.D.I.D.E.A. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could you put a link to the article please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I posted an answer at 14.14, but it's registered at 13.14 in my recent messages list. You had me worried that I had more time to home time than I thought I had.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
