|
Let me invert the question for you then. Is it worth spending time removing a feature that no one clicks on anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
Is this why men still have nipples?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the bug which was just introduced.
Please see my comment: http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/View.aspx?cmt=497349[^].
The source text of the comment was this:
<a href="http://whathaveyoutried.com"><u>http://whathaveyoutried.com</u></a>?
—SA
When we view the rendering of the text, the question mark appears on the separate line. We know that line breaks in HTML are rendered by the site software as <br/>, it's okay. But I did not insert these line breaks. When I click "edit" icon I can see that my original HTML text was mangled to:
<a href="http://whathaveyoutried.com">
<u>http://whathaveyoutried.com</u>
</a>?
—SA
I cannot fix it. Which is apparently wrong.
[EDIT]
The problem was observed using Mozilla browser: Seamonkey 2.20.
—SASergey A Kryukov
modified 19-Aug-13 15:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you mean that you are unable to correct it? If so,i just tried and edited that comment. Please refer it.
Rule of debugging: "If you get a different error message, you're making progress."
|
|
|
|
|
I mean that the text is mangled the way I described every time I edit it and post. I just tested it again: it still behaves like that.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
FireFox:
This is quite strange as it seems an issue with the browser's rendering of said HTML. I edited your comment to be completely in one line only, but when I saved it was distributed over several lines again.
IE8.0.7601:
Looking at the comment in IE immediately showed all the content in one line and when I edited the text it showed up all in one line.
Oh the wonders of cross-browser compatibility!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. This is not just the HTML. Apparently, the site uses scripting for post post-processing. But I did not face this problem before yesterday.
Thank you, Manfred.
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to be new to me too and I do quite a bit of editing. 
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
I see. Thank you very much for your attention to this problem.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Well what do you know. At work we're still using IE8 which does not exhibit the bug you mentioned, but now that I'm at home wit IE10 the same bug manifests itself.
 Did I mention that I find browser incompatibilities between versions of the same browser even worse than those between different browsers. 
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
A good point. I will update the post to mention I'm using the latest Seamonkey... But I thought it does not matter: the post is post.
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Especially true for IE
|
|
|
|
|
Quite some time ago I posted the following:
regardless of the number of times I attempt to confirm my email address hsmyers@gmail.com nothing happens. no email shows up---nothing---nada---zilch. i really dislike the various messages you display for those in this situation. please fix...
Dave Auld responded and possibly tinkered under the hood, but between the two us we've never had success.
To be clear, he sent me email directly with no problem. The fail seems confined to the autosend confirmation process. I wonder if we can't capture the output and examine it to see why it never hits my account---keeping in mind that I watch both incoming and spam boxes... BTW I also don't receive the 'E-mail me if someone replies to this message' autosend either. So something seems broken?
--hsm
|
|
|
|
|
Is is my IE again? Actually I am running Mozilla now.
I keep getting "...message already posted..." when I click "post message"
|
|
|
|
|
there were traffic issues on the servers, probably causing these[^] too
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have limits on title length but people are always going to post titles that are good, bad and ugly.
The mechanisms are already in place to allow you to either report a question or go in and edit a question or its title directly.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The mechanisms are already in place to allow you to either report a question or go in and edit a question or its title directly.
I get the following options while i am going to report some question:
Unclear or Incomplete
Repost
Not a question
Off-topic
Spam/abusive
Which option should i choose if i found title irrelevant or whole question in title? And why?
Rule of debugging: "If you get a different error message, you're making progress."
|
|
|
|
|
In these days,various silly or meaningless questions are coming up in a number.Sometimes i often feel bored to see such questions asking for please help me,send me the code,email me or interview type questions.For this,i suggest a feature of mouse hover option that will describe something about question quality and save time from those lame questions.
Generally we view questions like View all questions[^],but with this feature when someone points his mouse on a question he will see small description and tags of that question.Rating and reporting could also be added on that pop-up,if the description pleases him he will click the link as usual and give solution.But in case of a lame question,he need not to view all of that and in case of a spam he could report it from that pop-up.I think this could results CP more neat and clean.
It's only my opinion,hope for some discussions from expert's and Chris..
|
|
|
|
|
The rating of a question is indicated by the question being highlighted as green (good) or grey (bad), and the tags for each question are already shown.
I'm not sure what value the suggested changes would add.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you're right.But generally we need to click a question's link,go inside it,read about it's content and then rate it whether good or bad and then answer.But i said, we can view a short image of the question through mouse hover on that question link.The system would provide a short description about question's content and rating of the question.So we need not to go inside a question and saves time and energy from meaningless questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Ridoy,
Congratulations on earning a top-responder rank on QA !
imho, speaking as a non-Maunder, and a non-expert: there's just no practical way to filter; there are always going to be "edge cases" where someone's question may seem irrelevant to many, but, perhaps, relevant to at least someone(s).
Also, it seems to me that some people here (as in the one-and-only original Griff) are, at times, almost psychic, in seeing the real question hiding in language that may seem confused, and clarifying, and/or: answering. And, the confused language may be simply an artifact of the poster not knowing English well.
When you experience being bored in reading QA posts, or fed-up with the "static," perhaps it's time for you to take a break, ease-off a little ?
yours, Bill
~
“This isn't right; this isn't even wrong." Wolfgang Pauli, commenting on a physics paper submitted for a journal
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for suggestion and yes ,already 2 days out from CP to take some rest and for coming as a whole new, .
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
