|
I agree! Don't break your own security in order to fix their insecurity! I made my entire site to go into secure mode, before the first page is served. No man-in-the-middle attacks for me, please. I know it's supposed to produce more overhead. But I think the trade-off is worth it. I'd never tell my browser that it's OK to have mixed content. I'd rather be warned and make my own decision about whether I want to view the content.
I do find it disparaging when a site has a link to the log-in page on a page that is in non-secure mode.
Dana
|
|
|
|
|
On which page are you seeing this?
We've had some issues with ads serving up non-SSL content and I have personally offered to fly to the marketing agency and show them, using small words, how to fix their stuff, but that issues was (I was assured) fixed.
If you can consistently replicate it then send me the page and steps, or if it's random then send me a dump of the page's HTML and we'll debug.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It's random. For instance, just now it was on my account page...but then going back to it, it was gone. Must be an Ad serving non-SSL.
I grab the sources of any pages that do it and send them next time it happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Mixed Content Error happens while browser found some non secure source elements on secure webpage.
Example:
After Installing SSL certificate, web page URL loaded with https:// in the browser address bar. If browser founds non secure (http://) source like images, frames, iframes, Flash, and JavaScripts, then it displays mixed content warning massage.
Solution:
You need to change all URLs – https:// instead of http://
If you do not have permit to modify the code, then you need to change the browser setting to avoid this warning massage.
Tools > internet Option > Security Tab > Custom Level > Select “Enable” to "Display mixed content" > OK > Now get "Security Warning" pop-up > Click Yes.
Jason Parms - Customer service manager at SSL2BUY.com
|
|
|
|
|
I have been posting articles but I have never faced any issues until now. I am not able to see the images which I pasted in my article after the article got published.
This is the article I am talking about. (Flyweight design pattern-Rahul Dhammy)
Flyweight Design Pattern- C#[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Issue is resolved with your version in moderation queue. Wait for it to get published.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure what does that mean because my article was already published and I got a message from the team as well regarding this. Many readers who visited my article are complaining of the image issue as well. Had it not been published none of the readers would have been facing the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
He means that the new version of your article is currently in the moderation queue, and needs to be approved by the community before it gets published (and on this new version, the images are displayed fine).
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever you update the Article or submit a new one,it doesn't directly get published. It will first come into moderation queue where Members with sufficient previleges will approve it. The Article will be publicly available after 5 such approval.
Your updated Article is in Moderation queue. All the images are displayed properly. It will be published shortly.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Spam messages in some of the forums are not getting deleted after enough reports. Chris, will you please look into this on priority bases,if possible?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
When my blog post[^] got pulled, I edited it to improve category, tags and formatting. But when publishing, it turned into an article (and I didn't select another value in the dropdown). I could fix it by updating my article, selecting "Technical Blog" in the dropdown and adding the URL of my original blog post.
Could you please look into this issue?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
As per the title. Why? Sock Puppets?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Chill60's series of "Random xkcd to push the spam off the front page" messages where removed because they were junk posts meant to remove a spam message. I removed the spam message and so these (essentially placeholder) messages (and their entire threads) were just noise.
I'm not meaning to offend or judge - just trying to keep the place tidy. I'm the janitor around here...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, OK.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Ah!
Thanks for that - was just surprised to see "Posted span or abusive message" hits in my "Latest reputation" summary, and trying to find out why, and how it offended someone that badly.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
If you saw that then it wasn't me. I merely hit the "Go Nucular" [sic] button, not the Report button.
I checked your rep and I can see a "-1 point" for the removal of the message in the thread that was nuked, but nothing around a spam report against you.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Two "dings" at 04:55 yesterday: https://www.dropbox.com/s/uky27pqk9r6bm6p/Screenshot%202014-07-06%2013.31.07.png[^]
No points off (not that it would matter) - I just like to know how I've annoyed people! 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
22444 "Red points" (aka pending notifications)  . I wonder if that is yet another record  .
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I'd have more if the system hadn't decided not to send emails / notifications for replies in QA for a while!
(BTW: 22532 today, but I'm working on finding out when it rolls over  )
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Not offended!! 
Now OG has let me know about the caching I'll be more patient 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I moved my technical blog to a new location a couple of days ago.
I also imported the posts from the old blog. When I registered it with CodeProject, I forgot to remove the magic rel="tag" links from about 10 old posts and 3 of those were pulled onto CodeProject. The 3 posts that were chosen seemed to be chosen at random; 1 new post was not included. I immediately removed rel="tag" from the old posts and deleted the 3 duplicate posts from CodeProject.
I have now posted 3 new articles, two of which are a day old, and CodeProject is ignoring them. Ideas?
Location: Blog index is here[^], Atom is here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Looks pretty solid to me. Could you please try one thing for me? When you post your blog feed URL on CodeProject, can you please try putting "?alt=rss" at the end of it?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Just to confirm I understand what you're asking, do you want me to go to the feed page and change
http://loyc.net/atom.xml
to
http://loyc.net/atom.xml?alt=rss ?
I'm sure the Jekyll web server will ignore the parameter.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
