|
A very good idea...
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure how this is possible given that there's no way to select whether you choose spam or abuse without triggering the callback. I could have links to both forums I guess...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think you misunderstood.
The difference is not in what you choose (spam or abuse) but in what you are reporting (profile or article or QA).
When reporting an article it makes sense that the link goes to the moderators forum.
But when reporting an member profile I think it makes more sense to go to the spam and abuse forum.
For a Q/A question I'm not sure yet what the more logical forum to go to but my first thought would also be the spam and abuse forum since the moderators forum is for articles as I understand it.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
OK, that's a fair point. I was thinking more along the lines that there may be (and have been) discussions on a specific member and their posts. Someone submitting a spammy blog, or someone constantly posting poor quality stuff, for instance. There may be a discussion on how to moderate their contributions as a whole. However, I think this is the minor case when you're reporting a specific member and you're right: the major case for the report flag on a profile will be in discussing a user's behaviour, not their contributions.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I think this is the minor case when you're reporting a specific member and you're right: the major case for the report flag on a profile will be in discussing a user's behaviour, not their contributions.
We can only hope for a day when this is no longer the case 
Like I said noting major and if you decide to keep it linking to the moderator forum it's good for me as well, it's up to you
|
|
|
|
|
article written by DKG0414
At home page search for this subject there is a line that says: Download source and binary - 287.47 KB (in violet color).
I downloaded the program and there is no source code.
Is a good job done but when editing the output there is this lines:1 Displaying the data read from the sector (in hexadecimal, output redirection can also work)
2 Output Data
3 first block
4 Output Data
6 next blocks...
a) The blocks all end with line 1
b) these text at end could be "sector xx" where xx is the sector number.
(I try to look at forum but did not find where to put this and I think this is not a programming question. The program works but no source at all).
Thanks for this site. It is a great help for us.
Best Regards
Alvaro Pompeia (a_pompeia@hotmail.com)
|
|
|
|
|
It seems you refer to Reading and Writing to Raw Disk Sectors[^].
You should always post in the article forum. It is not only for programming questions but for all article related questions. The author is usually the only one who can answer your questions.
I have checked the download and found two source files inside with corresponding header files: sector.c and sector_io.c. It seems that these are the complete sources.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried unsubscribing the Research Library and not sure how, my "Professional" icon is gone. So I subscribed the library again but nothing... 
I checked all required fields for "Pro" status (marked with a red '*'), but all of them were there. Can you please check and let me know the field(s) that caused this?
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
The bribe, my dear, the bribe...
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Sir! I can see the "Professional" icon under my profile. 
Can you also get me back my 250 points please, they kind of matter a lot to someone who has only 20k of them.. 
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: they kind of matter a lot to someone who has only 20k of them
They matter the same having 20, 20k, or 20 mill...
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have just seen a new event pop into my rep history list for a newsletter opt-in: now, I'm maybe getting on, but don't remember having a senior moment... 
20 Nov 2014 7:02pm 50 Participant Newsletter opt-in MailingList Research Library Daily
What is this about, should you really be opt-ing people into things they haven't asked for? or is this a boo-boo 
|
|
|
|
|
Me too, not that I mind that really, but it happened the very same thing to me in the last 5 hours tops!
|
|
|
|
|
It's part of the Research Library: we send notifications of new items posted that match items that members have already downloaded. However, we're making sure it's all wrapped into a formal mailing list so we can provide a simple way for everyone to remove themselves from any of these emails.
And how on Earth do you spot rep changes so quickly??
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: And how on Earth do you spot rep changes so quickly??
I have a SignalR and Socket.io implants in my brain that subscribes to everything that changes on the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Evidently
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Do you just click on the link on the top-right of the page? To the left of the sign-out button?
|
|
|
|
|
yeh, I noticed the number take a step up and checked the rep list to see what triggered that and that's when I noticed.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: And how on Earth do you spot rep changes so quickly??
I have the same question. In the past several months, not once has that page loaded for me. It's always blank. Beginning to wonder if it's just me.
The page URL is http://www.codeproject.com/script/Reputation/List.aspx?mid=[id], right? If so, it's always blank for me. 
|
|
|
|
|
It has been very slow on occasion and same as you it hasn't worked some times just like you say. As if a timeout is occurring somewhere in the chain.
|
|
|
|
|
That's because your reputation is unquantifiable and there for can not be displayed
|
|
|
|
|
Odd, first two attempts just now worked. First time in months I've seen that page load for me. I guess it's just a load issue then. Not surprising with guys like OP refreshing the page every 5 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
That's because I had gone to bed and wasn't clicking it every 2 seconds
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
