|
I just tried this with Microsoft's Visual C++ compiler and it compiles cleanly.
|
|
|
|
|
I am using System Workbench (=gcc?) and I get error (not warning) message "initializer element is not constant".
|
|
|
|
|
arnold_w wrote: I am using System Workbench (=gcc?)
A pity you did not mention that in your original message.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure you are using the right tools for (cross?) compilation? The compiler should be aware of the target addressing modes and adjust the pointers size accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
Your statement 3 as written will only compile in C++ it isn't valid C code.
Which is why the person who tried it on VC++ it worked.
In C "myDummyFunc" can not be typecast to an address like in C++, in C "&myDummyFunc" is the pointer address that needs typecasting
Remember what that pesky "&" character means in C
The first case you list was defined as valid in C99, but your 3rd case is junk and correctly rejected
So try proper C code using the "&" so it understands what you are trying to do
myUint16struct_s myStruct3 = { (uint16_t)(uint32_t)&myDummyFunc };
Now if you want to do it properly so its portable the correct way is to use uintptr_t for the translation and C99 dot format
This allows you move the pointer anywhere within the struct and it sets correctly
myUint16struct_s myStruct4 = { .myFunctPtrTruncated = (uint16_t)(uintptr_t)&myDummyFunc };
In C99, uintptr_t will put some safety around your code because it is defined as
an unsigned integer type with the property that any valid pointer to void can be converted to this type, then converted back to pointer to void, and the result will compare equal to the original pointer
In vino veritas
modified 23-Oct-19 8:28am.
|
|
|
|
|
I still get the same error message.
|
|
|
|
|
Set the compiler flags -std=c11 or -std=c99 either standard will accept the code
The portable case has to work or you are on an old C89 compiler which I find odd given it accepts the shortcut syntax in 1
The only other choice is you are on something like a PIC where you have to use builtins to get function addresses because of the crazy 32K block arrangements on memory
In vino veritas
modified 23-Oct-19 8:40am.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any reliable location in windows registry that tell if the architecture of the machine is AMD or Intel ? If there is, where is this location ?
I know this location:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\HARDWARE\DESCRIPTION\System\CentralProcessor\0
and Identifier key, but my machine is Intel ... and I don't know what would be this value on AMD case ... is this a reliable location ?
P.S. Also, I know that I could find here:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Environment
PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE has AMD64 value, even if I have Intel machine ...
modified 22-Oct-19 15:17pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you do something like:
SYSTEM_INFO si;
GetSystemInfo(&si);
TRACE(_T("%u\n"), si.wProcessorArchitecture);
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
modified 22-Oct-19 16:08pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, but the request is to get this value from registry, not from API.
|
|
|
|
|
The information can also be found by the following powershell command:
PS C:\Users\rjmac> Get-WmiObject Win32_Processor
Caption : Intel64 Family 6 Model 142 Stepping 9
DeviceID : CPU0
Manufacturer : GenuineIntel
MaxClockSpeed : 2701
Name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz
SocketDesignation : U3E1
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I could do that even with cmd, but I need to do this task with my code (VC++).
|
|
|
|
|
Then I guess the registry key that you already referred is what you need to look at.
|
|
|
|
|
Then someone who has AMD processor could take a look on that location and tell me what value has PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER key (on location: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Environment) 
|
|
|
|
|
You could always try and find someone where you are who has an AMD system.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it is just a feeling, but is hard to find on someone who has AMD processor.
|
|
|
|
|
What problem are you actually trying to solve?
|
|
|
|
|
To know what is there, in PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE and PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER from HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Environment when machine has AMD processor.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but what problem are you actually trying to solve?
|
|
|
|
|
To know from registry if the machine has AMD or Intel processor. I guess is possible that.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, last try: what actual problem are you trying to resolve? Knowing whether it is AMD or Intel will not make any difference to the execution of your application, so I can only assume that you have found some other issue which you are keeping secret from us.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard, I am sorry if I was evasive ... Thank you for your patience.
I am working on some code which execute some depending of what kind of processor:
BOOL bIsIntel = FALSE;
SYSTEM_INFO si;
GetSystemInfo(&si);
bIsIntel = (si.wProcessorArchitecture == xxx);
if(bIsIntel)
{
}
else
{
}
Furthermore, the code is critical as speed of execution. So, I noticed that GetSystemInfo is taking a time, specially on older machines. So, I intend to retrieve from registry if the machine is AMD or Intel. That is all. I am not hiding anything. If I omitting anything, please tell me, and I will write here.
P.S. I don't have any AMD machine, or my colleagues ... if I would, I had tested myself.
|
|
|
|
|
_Flaviu wrote: I noticed that GetSystemInfo is taking a time
That is most likely because it has to go to the registry to get the information. You have placed that code in the wrong place. It should be called once at the beginning of the program to set a global or class variable that can then be tested at processor speed.
However, the chances of you being able to adjust the speed of your code at the point you show is not very likely. The compiler will optimise any code as much as possible, and whichever processor executes that code will further optimise it through the use of its own pipelining mechanism. Your time would be better spent working on real problems.
|
|
|
|
|
One way would be to run a registry-watching program (e.g., Process Explorer) while this piece of code executes. Then you can see what key(s) are being read.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Very good idea. I think I would try this solution too, however, the location from HARDWARE\... seem to show what I need it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
