|
Thanks for the advice on how to cope with it. You don't by any chance know what is responsible, topic wise, for this behavior?
Is this because of the concept of "Hiding"? I'm not sure what topic I need to google for to better understand it.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
bob16972 wrote: You don't by any chance know what is responsible, topic wise, for this behavior?
CDerivedClass does not have a two-argument DoSomething() method, hence the compiler error.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
I guess I'm missing the point. I apologize if I'm missing something right under my nose.
If your saying a derived class needs to implement all the virtual methods that are in the base, then I guess I'm not understanding why this works...
class CBaseClass
{
public:
CBaseClass(void) {}
virtual ~CBaseClass(void) {}
virtual void DoSomething(int a) {}
virtual void DoSomething(int a, int b) {}
};
class CDerivedClass : public CBaseClass
{
public:
CDerivedClass(void) {}
virtual ~CDerivedClass(void) {}
};
int _tmain(int argc, TCHAR* argv[], TCHAR* envp[])
{
CDerivedClass testing;
testing.DoSomething(5,5); // Get an error on this line
}
|
|
|
|
|
bob16972 wrote: If your saying a derived class needs to implement all the virtual methods that are in the base,
They don't have to be implemented, but when they are, their types must match.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, the following is allowed
int _tmain(int argc, TCHAR* argv[], TCHAR* envp[])
{
CBaseClass *pCDerivedClass = new CDerivedClass();
pCDerivedClass->DoSomething(5,5);
}
Please note: error check and cleanup left to the reader...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Noted. 
I had become complacent with being able to call any function implemented in the base class regardless of whether it was virtual using a pointer from any level in the derived hierarchy when there were no overloaded functions in the base class. This kinda throws me curve ball but I'm learning.
Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
|
|
hmm...what happened to inheritance?
CDerivedClass is a CBaseClass.
Logically, this doesn't seem like it should be an error.
Until you convince me otherwise
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
bob16972 wrote: Thanks for the advice on how to cope with it. You don't by any chance know what is responsible, topic wise, for this behavior?
Is this because of the concept of "Hiding"? I'm not sure what topic I need to google for to better understand it.
Polymorphism[^]
Therefore, what the virtual keyword does is to allow a member of a derived class with the same name as one in the base class to be appropriately called from a pointer, and more precisely when the type of the pointer is a pointer to the base class but is pointing to an object of the derived class
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
thanks. I guess the part that is confusing me is why a pointer, at any level, will invoke the base implementations when no function is overloaded (and not implemented in a derived class) but a pointer at the base class is required when functions are overloaded and an implementation for at least one overloaded function is not provided in the derived class.
|
|
|
|
|
You can add a using statement to promote the visibility of the base class functions.
class CDerivedClass : public CBaseClass
{
public:
CDerivedClass(void) {}
using CBaseClass::DoSomething;
virtual ~CDerivedClass(void) {}
virtual void DoSomething(int a) {}
};
The eliminates the "hiding" problem.
|
|
|
|
|
That seems to fix the issue.
Thanks for the help. Now I need to go back and undo the workaround code and the half baked solution I put in.
|
|
|
|
|
? I understand the basics of OOP and classes. But all the general info always talks about the box, the cat, the dog, the car etc. No one ever talks about user interface, database etc. Can someone shed some light on these subjects? Seems to me that for a compete program one would have to develop various class modules so to speak.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
egerving wrote: No one ever talks about user interface, database etc. Can someone shed some light on these subjects?
You might want to look at MFC. It has several classes for UI components (e.g, CListBox, CEdit) and databases (e.g., CDatabase). While those are specific examples, it shows that most anything can be thought of an as object.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
A cat is a box with four legs.
A car is a box with four wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
That is because OOP primary objective was zoo simulation.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZOOP for the sake of precision!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, this is my first time ever using ActiveX (so please bare with me) and I'm having trouble getting a control to work. I'm trying to use the control ScintillaVB (it can be found here http://www.ceditmx.com/scivb/index.asp[^] ) on a VC++ 2005 project (I'm also running Vistax64, maybe that's a factor), but when I place the .ocx on the form and run it, nothing shows up on the new window. I've followed all the directions given on the site, but maybe I don't understand using ActiveX controls well enough. Could someone please take a look at this, or give me a little help on the steps for setting up a ActiveX control in VC++ 2005 ? Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
If you have an already Registered ActiveX Control, you may use to the "Microsoft Visual C++ ActiveX Test Container" i suggest to you as by secondary step.
|
|
|
|
|
1......
UINT lesson(LPVOID prog)
{
CMainDlg *dlg=(CMainDlg*)AfxGetApp()->GetMainWnd();
Sdlg->UpdateData();
CString l_mesg=mesg;
int l_index=l_mesg.Find('@');
CString l_name=l_mesg.Left(l_index);
CString l_id=l_mesg.Right(l_mesg.GetLength()-l_index-1);
int L_ITEMS = dlg->m_lessonlistcontrol.GetItemCount();
int l_pos=dlg->m_lessonlistcontrol.InsertItem(L_ITEMS,l_name,0);
dlg->m_lessonlistcontrol.SetItemText(l_pos,1,l_id);
dlg->UpdateData(0);
AfxEndThread(0,true);
return 0;
}
void CMainDlg::Receive()
{
stusock.Receive(mesg,rsize);
AfxBeginThread(lesson,NULL,THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL,0,0,NULL);
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
2..............
UINT lesson(LPVOID prog)
{
CMStudentDlg *Sdlg=(CMStudentDlg*)AfxGetApp()->GetMainWnd();
Sdlg->UpdateData();
CString l_mesg=mesg;
int l_index=l_mesg.Find('@');
CString l_name=l_mesg.Left(l_index);
CString l_id=l_mesg.Right(l_mesg.GetLength()-l_index-1);
int L_ITEMS = Sdlg->m_lessonlistcontrol.GetItemCount();
int l_pos=Sdlg->m_lessonlistcontrol.InsertItem(L_ITEMS,l_name,0);
Sdlg->m_lessonlistcontrol.SetItemText(l_pos,1,l_id);
Sdlg->UpdateData(0);
AfxEndThread(0,true);
return 0;
}
void CMStudentDlg::Receive()
{
stusock.Receive(mesg,rsize);
AfxBeginThread(lesson,NULL,THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL,0,0,NULL);
}
/////////////////////////
pls tell where am wrong the main diffrence is the 1st one is in the main dialog of the application of the project which i am doing in VC6 its working with out any problem
but the sencond one its is not written in the main dialog but in a newly inserted dialog its'nt showing any error when i run the project but its not showing the reqired result ie no values is displayed or some time its show run time error
|
|
|
|
|
JOBYTHOMAS24 wrote: pls tell where am wrong
Please provide a link to the documentation you read that told you to use AfxEndThread(...) in the way you are using it.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
void AFXAPI AfxEndThread(UINT nExitCode, BOOL bDelete = TRUE); in afxwin.h
this is what am getting when right click on AfxEndThread and goes for its definition
|
|
|
|
|
JOBYTHOMAS24 wrote: void AFXAPI AfxEndThread(UINT nExitCode, BOOL bDelete = TRUE); in afxwin.h
So you think the declaration in the header file is the documentation? No it is not.
Check this out[^]
And follow the linked content that says:
For more information on AfxEndThread, see the article Multithreading: Terminating Threads.
If you want to be a software developer you are going to have to read more than header files. 
Last modified: 3hrs 42mins after originally posted -- fixed URL in link
led mike
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
