|
This error comes on 64bits OS's when the loader try to link a wrong DLL (typically a 32bits DLL in a 64bits executable).
Check again your project and verify that you are correctly linking to 64bits versions of all DLL's.
Maybe your program use a DLL built for 32bits. The linking could complete even with wrong import library, then the error is triggered at loading time.
The most common case is when a manifest is present in whichever library reporting X86 build, the loader, and this made me mad, testardly try to load 32bits version of commctl32.dll 
|
|
|
|
|
Using Excel Automation in Visual Studio 2010 C++, how do I define a name? As a user of Excel, you can enter a name that then can be used in formulas to refer to a range of cells. The range changes as the user inserts columns or rows. My program has worked with various versions of Excel dating back to the early 2000’s. I have a bunch of classes derived from COleDispatchDriver: CXLApplication, CXLRange, CXLWorkbook, CXLWorkbooks, and CXLWorksheet that have many functions, but I have no documentation (anybody have any clues on where to find documentation?). Anyone know how to define a named range using functions of these classes (probably CXLRange)?
modified 5-Mar-15 3:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
Where do these classes come from?
|
|
|
|
|
These classes were generated years ago from the Excel type library using Class Wizard. I note that these classes can be generated using Class Wizard on Visual Studio 2010 as well: MFC Class Wizard->Add Class (arrow)->MFC Class from Typelib...->Add Class from Typelib Wizard->Available Type libraries: Microsoft Excel 15.0 Object Library<1.8>. Then you add the classes, using whatever names you want and the files are automatically generated. However, the classes in my legacy code are a bit different than later versions of Excel. Also if you know where to find documentation for these classes, it would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but you will have to figure it out then. I have no idea what they do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I am using g++ to compile on a raspberry pi.
using the following the project compiles:
g++ -c file1.cpp file2.ccp .....filen.cpp
however using the following I get numerous messages as follows:
filen.cpp: (.text+0xb73c): undefined reference to `*******
etc etc etc
these functions are defined in a header file in each of the file*.cpp files thus:
#include "funcdefs.h"
this header file is located in the same directory as the *.cpp files
the header file was originally entitled FUNCDEFS.H but I changed the name to lower case funcdefs.h to stop the compiler complaining.
the funcdefs file contains the following code:
#if !defined(funcdefs_h)
#define funcdefs_h
extern double func1 ( double f ) ;
extern void func2 ( double *input ) ;
#endif
I have tried making the preprocessor directive in the funcdefs.h file lower case (didn't make any difference) and have checked the include path using -H and it seems to find the file but cannot get it to link.
Any ideas?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
The error does not occur during compiling but during linking. It tells you that the final program did not contain the functions in one of the compiled files.
You must also add the source files with those functions to your project. So copy the source file(s) (e.g. funcdefs.cpp) to your directory and add them to the g++ build command.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Jochen
I might not have given you enough information. The actual text of the linking error message is:
In function `process(int, char*, ControlData*, char*, char*)':
PROCESS.CPP: (.text+0x788): undefined reference to `readsig(MiscParams*, char*)'
PROCESS.CPP: (.text+0xaac): undefined reference to `sig_save(Signal*, char*)'
PROCESS.CPP: (.text+0xdd4): undefined reference to `display(Signal*, MiscParams*, int)'.............
......etc etc etc
so there are many undefined references to functions from within the function 'process' contained in PROCESS.CPP
however; all these functions are defined in funcdefs.h as follows:
extern int readsig ( MiscParams *misc , char *namelist , int *nsigs ,
Signal ***signals , char *error ) ;
etc etc etc
as I understand it, the various individual *.cpp files are referring to functions that are defined within funcdefs.h shouldn't these definitions be included from this file by the pre processor instruction and therefore be defined references?
Or are you saying that it is the function 'process' in PROCESS.CPP that is calling other undefined references? The very first such call is 'readsig' which is defined in functions.h
Or are you saying that I should just call functions.h functions.cpp?
This is driving me nuts so thanks for your help!
++++++++++EDIT+++++++++++
Jochen - I think I'm beginning to get your drift! The fundefs.h file only contains function prototypes not definitions 
modified 4-Mar-15 5:19am.
|
|
|
|
|
I just saw you edited your post and got it. But I will answer anyhow (I had already written this but the CP servers where unavailable for some minutes):
I suggest to read about definitions and declarations in C/C++ because these are often mixed up.
See the first answer of this Stackoverflow thread: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1410563/what-is-the-difference-between-a-definition-and-a-declaration[^]
You have declarations for the functions in your header files. So the sources will compile.
But you don't have definitions for the functions in any of your source files. So the linkage will fail.
You must add the source files containing the definitions. For the readsig function this must be a source file containing:
int readsig ( MiscParams *misc , char *namelist , int *nsigs ,
Signal ***signals , char *error )
{
}
|
|
|
|
|
You must include the library or object modules that contains the actual code of the missing functions. As Jochen already mentioned, these are linker errors, nothing to do with compiling or header files.
|
|
|
|
|
class M
{
//variables
public:
protected:
private:
//functions
public:
M();
~M();
virtual int foo(int);
protected:
private:
M( const M &c );
M& operator=( const M &c );
int i, j;
}; //M
Thanks, any help as always is appreciated.
Cheers
Vaclav
|
|
|
|
|
They are merely section markers, probably put in by some automatic code generator. They allow the developer to easily add properties and functions in the correct places.
|
|
|
|
|
If your question is, why the copy constructor and assignment operator are declared private: This is to prevent the users of the class from copying objects of that type. At least the assignment operator is created atomatically by the compiler, if the designer of the class doesn't explicitely specify one. This default assignment operator simply copies all members. So without the operator you could write
M m1, m2;
m2 = m1;
and it would compile. With this class definition as it is, you will get a compile time error that the operator is not accessible.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am new to COM. I have a DLL which is written in C. I want to make that DLL a COM dll. SO that i can register it and my application can use it. I tried google a lot. But not finding any satisfactory answer.
Please answer if you have any idea about how to achieve the said.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below is my code tried
class CVersion
void CVersion::ReadValue(BYTE *Buffer, int n_Length, int n_Source)
{
EnterCriticalSection(&m_sReadCritical);
CString tempBuffer((BYTE*)Buffer);
m_svalue = tempBuffer;
m_cData->Data(this);
LeaveCriticalSection(&m_sReadCritical);
}
class CClassVersion
void CClassVersion::Data(CVersion *pcVers)
{
CString m_Value1 = pcVers->m_sValue;
this->SetDlgItemTextA(IDC_EDIT_VAL,m_Value1);
}
//Declared in CVersion header file
protected:
CClassVersion* m_cData;
An Runtime error occurs"Unhandled exception at 0x782ac7da in .exe:0xC0000005:Access violation reading location 0x00000020."
after SetDlgItemText stmt.
Please guide me for the same.
modified 2-Mar-15 1:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
You should step through the code with your debugger to see which variable is invalid. There is nothing obvious in the above code, although it is not easy to understand what it is supposed to be doing.
|
|
|
|
|
Can i use callback function over der?How??????please guide me for the same.Thankyou
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11438021 wrote: Can i use callback function
For what reason? You first need to diagnose what is happening in your code to cause the error. When you enter the critical section what are you trying to synchronise with?
[edit]
void CVersion::ReadValue(BYTE *Buffer, int n_Length, int n_Source)
{
EnterCriticalSection(&m_sReadCritical);
CString tempBuffer((BYTE*)Buffer);
m_svalue = tempBuffer;
m_cData->Data(this);
LeaveCriticalSection(&m_sReadCritical);
}
You are setting m_svalue to point to tempBuffer, but as soon as you exit this function that buffer will get released so the pointer is no longer valid. Looking at this code again I cannot see what useful purpose it serves.
[/edit]
|
|
|
|
|
I want to update the text(string) on u/i page.I am sending the message on button click and want to receive the same string on Edit controlBox.
|
|
|
|
|
Then you need to manage the lifetime of the string. If you pass it from one thread to another then you must ensure it is not deleted from its source until the destination has taken a secure copy. In your sample code your destination thread is taking a copy, but only into a temporary location which immeditely gets disposed. Assuming that m_svalue is a string pointer then you just need to allocate a buffer of the required size to it, and copy the message string across. You can then delete it at some later point.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you just give the sample code for the same.Because i tried ,but i am doing a small mistake somewhere.How will i store the string in a buffer so that it can be accessible from another class and use for updating the text.
|
|
|
|
|
Sample code for what? Allocate a memory buffer, copy the string into it, and pass it to the receiver. The receiver can then keep that buffer until it is no longer needed.
|
|
|
|
|
I assume this is a threading problem. The code can probably be called from different threads (that's why you use a Critical Section), but the control text can only be set from the GUI thread.
The easiest way to achieve this is using a timer. So in the ReadValue() fucntion you only put the data into m_svalue. And in the OnTimer() function (which runs in GUI thread) you call Data(). This would of cource mean that you need to store the most recently used CClassVersion object somewhere.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
