|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: without the article I can't tell - but we mere mortals can't locate articles based on your email address as that is kept private.
The link given in the 2nd message points to a draft. You should be able to see it.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plagiarism and additionally (at least in my opinion) real close to the spam boundary if not crossing it.
Case closed.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have already shared article link and hope to resolve this issue which decourge me to be part of communities.. it am having this account more than 7 years but never faced such issue.
Thanks,
Niranjan
|
|
|
|
|
I have had a look to your post.
The central topic about your blog was regarding Docker.
Yes Docker has a free version, but too an Enterprise version with more features. What means, you need to pay for it if you want to have all possibilities and this is something not really well accepted and a technique that many spammers try.
I am not saying that advertising was your goal, but... seeing the draft. I would report it to be removed (If I didn't do it yet).
When @sean-ewington comes to work he will have a look and give a verdict. If innocent, then he has the power to reinstate your account and even the publication. If not innocent... well, have a nice day 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-Ewington
Forget the look-see Sean - it wasn't closed as spam, it was closed as plagiarism.
We do not like plagiarists: and we don't give them second chances because we've tried before and they nearly always turn round and do it again. Some of them try to be smarter and disguise the theft better, but some don't even bother doing that.
You know what you copied, you know you shouldn't do it. But you probably didn't realize - or care - that we are good at spotting it, and since we all write our own material and know how hard it is to do that we don't put up with people who try to get a short cut and steal other people's work.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much for your message. Your blog entry and account were closed because your blog entry plagiarized another source without giving it credit. Unfortunately plagiarism is a growing problem on CodeProject. We've tried many things to tackle this issue. We've re-activated accounts of plagiarists and even worked with them to teach them what plagiarism is, and tried to work with them to get their articles in working order.
Experience has taught us this method does not work. A recurring theme with plagiarists is that they want their articles published, regardless of the cost. Publishing an article correctly on CodeProject, that is, publishing an article that aims to teach and exhaustively explains as much as possible about a subject or particular problem and its solution, is far more important than simply getting an article published. The focus should never on being published, the focus should be on using your own words and your own knowledge to help others.
Posting a piece of plagiarized material conflicts with CodeProject's purpose, and is hurtful to a community full of authors. As such, neither your article nor your account will be restored and this will be our last say on the matter.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that Sean!
Sorry to have dragged you in, but he was claiming it was closed as spam, and we do make mistakes from time to time... 
Have a good weekend!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I could hear the gavel drop while reading this. 
When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others.
Same thing when you are stupid.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean for the explanation related to the issue but deleting the article is fine but deleting the account is feels like a big punishment for the mistake that can be corrected and avoidable in future after knowing about the plagiarized article material..
Thanks again...
|
|
|
|
|
niranjankala wrote: but deleting the account is feels like a big punishment
Please read his answer again... 2nd chance and "re-education" has been already tried, but without success.
niranjankala wrote: after knowing about the plagiarized article material..
The first link in the list of the FAQs...
CodeProject Plagiarism FAQ[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated. The troll had already been sent back to hide under his bridge.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member 13307565 - Professional Profile[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
| .
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 13-Jul-17 4:28am.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 13-Jul-17 4:28am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
