|
Coding like it's 2002? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the overall concepts behind WPF was to make its development similar to web development and in that regard it has been quite successful.
I definitely got a chuckle out of that one. Yup. Very similar to web development. Complicated, quirky, hideous syntax...
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Very similar to web development. Complicated, quirky, hideous syntax...
And don't forget: design over content/functionality. With some beautiful animations, no one will ask about function...
|
|
|
|
|
Recently I've had the "pleasure" of working with several Java apps. Of them, only CLion works well. The rest are slow as mud, unstable and all around awful. So, no thanks.
(It is pretty funny how Java borrows so much from .NET and calls it its own.)
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is working on a new to-do style app that is currently called Project Cheshire. Because they needed something to compete with the to-do list they bought?
|
|
|
|
|
My God, Cheshire, from those screenshots, looks hideous.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they wanted it like the Cheshire Cat, so you wouldn't see it most of the time?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
If using a feline, they should have gone with The Pink Panther.
His list goes: To do, to do, to do to do to do to dooo...dah.
|
|
|
|
|
 and  at the same time.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Cheshire is a beautiful place  .
|
|
|
|
|
A browser extension which was found to be harvesting users' browsing histories and selling them to third parties has had its availability pulled from a number of web browsers' add-on repositories. "And isn't it ironic? Don't you think?"
|
|
|
|
|
“People will have time to do other things, more complex things, more interesting things,” he told CNBC. “Certainly more leisure time. And then we gotta figure how we integrate with a world and future with a vast AI.” Including CEO?
I think he needs to stop reading Iain M. Banks. Or at least treating those books as forecasts.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm more and more convinced that this will become necessary in the future. Thing keep getting more and more automated, even IT related tasks. Almost no part of society will go untouched.
But there is more to it than just universal incoming. There will always be jobs that will have to be done and there are a lot of factors that will have to be taken in to account. Also this is something countries will have to work together on if we are going to solve.
For example if the right investments were done at least 1/3 of all workers could go at where I worked with and if I consider the technologies avalible today as much as 2/3 are at risk. We are a supplier to mostly automotive industries and sooner or later there will be someone who opens a plant which is almost 100% automated with greater productivity and quality as well as precision delivery.
If you look around at all the other factories were I live its mostly true for these to. Even sales could be automated and transportation also got a clock ticking.
This means that in the coming decades society will have to adapt to this or there will be a huge increase in income disparity.
A country which successfully automates and manages to keep its industries productive and competitive will free up people to pursue other options. We might look at a possible education/knowledge boom. If a country adapts to universal income and over the time of change frees up 50% of their work force I do believe a lot of people will seek out other avenues to contribute just to have something to do which may make this country even more competitive.
Tbh I'm glad to be alive today and being able to see how the world evolves, we just have to avoid major events that set back this change.
|
|
|
|
|
First of all... I like your vision.
Member 11683251 wrote: This means that in the coming decades society will have to adapt to this or there will be a huge increase in income disparity.
We already have experience and I am not so optimistic about a big change in this
Member 11683251 wrote: We might look at a possible education/knowledge boom.
Or to a new war period. People with too much free time tend to do silly things.
Member 11683251 wrote: I do believe a lot of people will seek out other avenues to contribute just to have something to do which may make this country even more competitive.
I really hope you are right on this
Member 11683251 wrote: Tbh I'm glad to be alive today and being able to see how the world evolves,
I have to admit it is really interesting.
Member 11683251 wrote: we just have to avoid major events that set back this change.
We need a really big social / human nature evolution step to do this. And looking to the last 2000 years in our history... we are far from even leading in this direction.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11683251 wrote: Almost no part of society will go untouched.
A simple cost/benefit analysis claims the other end. Realize what can be automated today, and go to Africa.
Member 11683251 wrote: society will have to adapt to this or there will be a huge increase in income disparity.
There already is, don't blame it on the robots.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see why we need extra income if robots will create food/clothes and other things including raw material...
All should be for free as robots need no payment...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
We will still need some way to distribute things, just because human labour isn't needed doesn't mean supply wont be bigger than demand. Either you need a que system or some other way to sort out who will get what. In the future money might be replaced by some sort of currency linked to energy/time and environmental factors. Universal income is a stepping stone towards this.
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Income starts to sound like communism, and with the greatest will in the world, it won't work, as some people will always think they are wroth more than others.
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that the overwhelming majority of people would not know what to do with all the leisure time. As such, the most important product of the future is likely to be a drug that keeps them docile. The soma of Brave New World will become a reality.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
With our current setup soma is inevitable...
As today there are some who hold the resources (country or private) and the others have only their work. Without that work and without true freedom (economic and intellectual) all have to be in a prison to not to get wild... Soma is the prison...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny coming from a man who has spent years feeding at the government trough.
|
|
|
|
|
The military today, we cubicle slaves tomorrow ? [^]Quote: US military successfully tests electrical brain stimulation to enhance staff skills
... in a series of experiments at the air force base, the researchers found that electrical brain stimulation can improve people’s multitasking skills and stave off the drop in performance that comes with information overload.
Research cited: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience: "The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Multitasking Throughput Capacity" [^]
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi raddevus,
Your recall of Dilbert is impressive: may I ask if you are using any cognitive enhancement pharmaceutics ? !
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
