|
Ashley van Gerven wrote: One annoyance for me is when your fingers get caught between keys when they don't have a smooth underside.
How thin are your fingers? 2mm?
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 mm
"For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza
CP article: SmartPager - a Flickr-style pager control with go-to-page popup layer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's because I've got a free MSDNAA academic licence for Windows and VS. Beside these I use only freeware.
Greetings - Gajatko
Portable.NET is part of DotGNU, a project to build a complete Free Software replacement for .NET - a system that truly belongs to the developers.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you ! I'm on linux since 1 year and i wont return on Windows. Maybe Mac OS X but not windows.
|
|
|
|
|
I generally get a HP workstation class laptop with the 3 yr on-site warranty. Even covers lightning strikes
www.CADbloke.com
The Broadcast Systems Documentation SYSTEM
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation"
-Zen & the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like my laptop with an OS that works too
|
|
|
|
|
You should still wipe it and re-install anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
I so fully agree. I like my drive partitionned. Nothing so dreadful as a 300 GB C: drive and a dell logo desktop.
|
|
|
|
|
we work in IT or we don't.
at least, you could still do it yourself
|
|
|
|
|
If it dont work whatgoodis it?
I use an older Ibm to weigh dowd folded paper on a scanner
, it happens to be the right size and flat on the bottom. (now there are good features.}
|
|
|
|
|
With a laptop, the expected life-span is very important to me. Because it is very difficult to upgrade anything else except the RAM, and even that is expensive, once the laptop is a few years old, it may not be able to handle the applications of the day. I know that with my four-year-old laptop (knock on wood), which is a Centrino 1.4, I can't open too many applications at once anymore, because they are too heavy. I have stopped most windows services that look unimportant, I only have very few icons in the system tray, etc. No heavy graphics, like screen-savers, I can't even run heavy flash (10) applications, as these will cause my CPU to overload.
|
|
|
|
|
Schmuli wrote: Because it is very difficult to upgrade anything else except the RAM, and even that is expensive, once the laptop is a few years old
Not always. I spent $22 US to go from 1GB to 2GB on my Dell D820 because windows 7 thrashed a lot with only 1 GB of ram and it was impossible to use for programming even for test projects because it was always thrashing. Now with 2GB things are much better. I have to say the install was not easy being that there were no instructions and I had to figure out where the second dimm was located. Google was not much help at that because there were thousands of hits and the first 100 or so were not about swapping ram. After I found the secret (second dimm is under keyboard the install was easy..
John
|
|
|
|
|
Just wondering where you found a gig of ram for $22 US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay who was the idiot who univoted voted me?
John
|
|
|
|
|
Earlier this year, I bought 2 Gig of DDR2 PC8500 RAM for my Dell laptop for under $50 at Frys. RAM is not that expensive for a laptop, not any more. (Unless you buy it from the OEM.)
|
|
|
|
|
Eddie Kuns wrote: RAM is not that expensive for a laptop, not any more. (Unless you buy it from the OEM
Or buy it at Best Buy. I have seen ridiculous prices at Best Buy for computer hardware. I sometimes feel sorry when I see confused individuals asking questions about products that are 3 times the price that you can buy them online. To me I feel that it's like watching someone being mugged but doing nothing..
I would have added compusa and circuit city (the other two major electronics / computer stores in my area but both closed their doors..)
John
|
|
|
|
|
Disk speed + CPU + Memory are the main factors. You must have a quick disk as this makes a massive difference. I have worked on machines that boost good memory and CPU speeds but had a slow drive speed (1400 rpm). It was like walking an old woman across the road. However, Using a disk speed of 10000 rpm or more will give you a very noticeable difference with SQL server and Visual Studio
|
|
|
|
|
Do they even make 10000 rpm laptop drives?
John
|
|
|
|
|
Not to my knowledge. I just got carried away and forgot about the Survey title
However, I would love to go for a SSD drive but would settle for a 7200rpm.
|
|
|
|
|
No problem..
I am waiting on the price of ssd drives specifically when the OCZ Vertex series 60GB model becomes the current price of the 30GB model. $129 is the right price just not the right capacity..
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227393[^]
I expect to be able to get what I want in 2011. For me this will be for desktop usage and I will still need either a network drive (at work) or a local disk at home. I would put the OS and development partition on the SSD array with data (I process medical images) on a > 1 TB hard drive.
John
|
|
|
|
|
Very nice, I wanted SSD before I got my last laptop but none that I saw would support RAID.
|
|
|
|
|
I bought OCZ Vertex 30gb drive few weeks ago and boy it's called speed But there is small problem if you want to make RAID0 with SSDs. RAID controller simply cannot handle that throughput
|
|
|
|
|
No... but, IMO, 7200rpm on a 2.5" disk is pretty comparable with a 10k rpm on a 3.5" disk.
The angular speed on the edge of a 2.5" disk is greater than on a 3.5".
On the other hand... this is a laptop.
Unless you always use it on your desk or anywhere near a plug, a 7.200rpm disk will dump your battery much quicker than with a 5400rpm disk.
To take full advantage of a 7200rpm you need to be at full power, no power saver mode enabled... so bye bye battery.
Don't get me wrong, currently I have a ASUS G1S with a 350Gb 7200rpm disk but it's the only computer I got, I need it powerful yet portable but usually don't need much time away from a plug.
So, choose wisely based on what you need your laptop for. You can't have it all... Powerful, lightweight, thin and with a 4h battery.
|
|
|
|
|
AlexCode wrote: No... but, IMO, 7200rpm on a 2.5" disk is pretty comparable with a 10k rpm on a 3.5" disk.
The angular speed on the edge of a 2.5" disk is greater than on a 3.5".
That is true and it is one of the tricks scsi drives had been using for years (one reason for their smaller capacity), however comparing a laptop drive to a desktop I have yet to own a laptop drive that I thought was fast. The speed of current generation 7200 RPM laptop drives reminds me of 4 years ago performance from 7200RPM sata desktop drives.
John
|
|
|
|