15,886,659 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by ryanconrad (Top 1 by date)
ryanconrad
14-Apr-13 11:41am
View
Reason for my vote of 1 \n Your content type is incorrect. ContentType is not the file extension, it should be something like "image/png" or "image/jpeg".
You are also claiming that this can help application performance. This is not a true statement. Images are normally delivered as static files, not having to be processed by ASPNET, by running all images through this, it is actually putting a heavier load on the server. Also, the browser will not cache the images very well because they will all have the same url.
You are also using double the memory to load your image, mainly because of the issue with saving a png directly to the output stream, but still using double. The original image is read from disk and loaded in memory. then you create another image to hold the resized image.
I would not run this in a production environment. It would actually degrade the performance of the entire application. You are better off creating your images sized to how you need them ahead of time and let them load as static files.