Comments by nitrous_007 (Top 35 by date)

List out the exact location of the executable and the steps you are performing (list step by step in detail) to execute the program. That would help narrow down the issue.

It could be. Is that the normal behavior for VSIX tool for the tool window GUI to flash and reset so as to recover from the exception? This is my first time working with VSIX project.

Yes. It might be that in the worker thread work completed thread, I am not checking if error is not null . I added that. Before this I couldn’t identify a crash in the output log when I run and it only crashed once in a while so tough to debug.

Change the title of your question to something more relevant. Rooms is something only relevant to you. If somebody sees the title of the question, they would have no idea what you are talking about.

Correct

Hi,
I am getting confused by the description of your issue. Remove everything about your particular application- remember you don't care to tell us about that. Stick to description of the code only. For example. I have a Form1 which opens Form2. When I click a button on Form2, I want it to trigger an even in Form1 etc etc

Thank you

I need to do it for my application. This is for testing devices and all the devices attached to each network card have the same IP. currently I can do ping, snmp by binding to network card however system.windows.forms.webbrowser does not work.

I guess if not I have to find another HTTP control. I do have another way to do the bind but it will take some time. The System.Windows.Forms.WebBrowser was already implemented by another engineer for one interface and I was trying to see if there is a way to reuse it.

Please let me know

Did you ever see an issue where you had only 1 thread running, you saw the reply in wireshark but your program is not able to capture it?

How many threads do you have running talking to how many ethernet destinations?
Are you able to recreate the issue with just one thread?

Hi Soderlund,
I tried just one thread only and am able to reproduce the bug but only randomly. When I see that my bigger application is seeing the bug, I close the bigger app down and start a small test app where its only running 1 thread. I can see that after i send the data, wireshark is able to see it but my async callback is not reporting it. I have tried to do a send and receive without any callbacks synchronously and that has the same results. After 10 minutes of no operation, everything works normally which is very weird.

Now I am wondering if there are issues with the computer itself. I have 2 other machines running without any problems. I do have 4 ethernet cards with a total of 16 ports on the computer. I am talking to 4 ethernet ports at the same time but am able to recreate the issue with one thread. i know that sometimes when there are a lot of ethernet cards are present on the same computer, there can be issues on the computer. I am wondering if a driver update or windows update i did caused the issues. I know the other computers dont have this issue. I have about 300 pc's with some windows updated and some not. So Its kind of hard for me to figure it out if windows update has to do anything with it. any thoughts?

I use a library from SNMPsharpnet. The library is closing the socket after the SNMP operation is done. Should i change it?

Thanks unfortunately No. The problem remains. I guess nobody does this kind of coding.

I did find something. I have to set Socket Options before the bind to get socket options to be working. I was setting Socket options after bind but this is alternative code I tried. I will try this alternative code again with the fix

Ok. but I see delivery in wire-shark. So I am expecting the packet to captured in my socket also. What could be happening here?

http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/64628/Code-Project-Quick-Answers-FAQ

Section 4. Subsection 1

:)

What is this? WinForms or WPF?

I agree that time, money, motivation etc are all factors. Too many hours are wasted by trying to write perfect code :)

Hi,Does the separate processes use more memory? I am familiar with CLR and PInvoke but I would have to convince the other team to change it.

This is not my project but another teams. I am trying to understand why this scenario is bad from a programming perspective for an application.
Also the other team mentioned that they were having issues keeping up user demand. I am familiar with the their architecture. So that's why i am posting the question

I dont have to port it to C#. I could call the C++ code as CLR from C#. I just need to know if its worth it.

excuse me?

Ok I will keep reading about it.

If I create the a class derived from Exception and use it, what is the advantage over the following scenario-
Instead of creating another class, I just store the errorCode and error Strings in some variables and return gracefully from the program.
Is the Exception class just a good way of wrapping up the errorCode and errorString in a nice way? What other advantages would I get from an exception derived class?

I am not that much of an expert. So here is my attempt at digressing this information-
So are you saying that we should limit the number of try catches and put them in a higher level instead of putting the try catch in a very low level in the program?
What about other errors that are not exceptions?

You mean return an exception object? instead of an integer or just use it get error information

Thanks i would be interested to know this also.
Does this seem to be accurate using your wireless adapter?

Thank you. Appreciate your help!! I am going to buy some books on Threading also.

That is exactly what the Java book said..If there is compiler optimization etc, the computer might have 2 copies of isEnd and it might never be synchronized. Thanks I will look up compiler optimization.