|
It is a term of abuse, which suggests the the person does not tolerate anyone else's opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You were abusive. I am assuming that is what you were downvoted on. Also insinuating he was a dumb POS would count as abuse.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I am not the person who marked the post abusive (which registers as a spam vote in your reputation I believe), I can only surmise this was what happened. It certainly isn't an abuse of privilege. The button is on there available for almost all.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
You seem to misunderstand why there is a privilege needed to vote spam or abuse. This ability used to be open to all but we found that there were cases where people were signing up shill accounts for the purpose of voting. The reason that a certain level is needed before voting is to put some barrier in place to prevent this behaviour. Or would you prefer we went back to a system where someone could sign up 20 or 30 times and voted against you?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
The question I have to ask is why are you so bent out of shape about this? Ultimately, as these are only one offs, they have no real effect and rep points has no real relevance. I don't even bother looking up my rep any more it's so irrelevant. I have no idea what rep I have.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eh? Those three links go to CodeProject messages that are rather daft eye roll type messages. If you're talking about his signature, there's no link to anything in there, so the message isn't spamming.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, if you feel that way, vote it as spam. That is your right.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've just voted you up. You should get +24 so you are now + 8 better up.
Can you quit whining now?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like this message has also been voted down. Now *that* is abuse of privileges.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, that's me, the downvoter - I saw only now your tantrum here.
Quote: being a gun toting drumpf loving bigot such as yourself
Trust me, if someone says that to my face he'll have to write it down in order to repeat it.
The Soapbox is a place for debate, for not KSS posts and even heated arguments - not for name-calling. You particularly irked me quite often with your unbearable attitude and since you went down straight to petty insults I marked that post as abusive.
CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"Go ahead, make my day"
|
|
|
|
|
|
N_tro_P wrote: Hurr durr, I declare a rep war!
CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"Go ahead, make my day"
modified 6-Feb-17 11:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll check with my secretary exactly how many forks I give about 16 or 32 or 16384 rep points.
Oh wait, I don't have a secretary... time to find one, apparently. Hold the line!
CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"Go ahead, make my day"
|
|
|
|
|
It's not just about rep points - if multiple abuse reports are submitted against you, your account can get automatically disabled. Probably not an issue for you since you are not using your real name, and can thus create another anonymous account similar to the one you have now.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: if multiple abuse reports are submitted against you, your account can get automatically disabled
AFAIU it works if multiple abuse votes get to my account (not my posts) from different sources. 100 Abuse reports from a single user would just bring my rep down of (his_weight * 100) points.
And if a post has less than 5 abuse reports it stays visible. Either someone kicks on 5 sock puppets and then forfeits all of his accounts to the banhammer or the damage is NIL.
Nish Nishant wrote: Probably not an issue for you since you are not using your real name
I use my internet name (cured with the 88 suffix because 5 letters usernames are too short) since 2000, I'd feel bad abandoning it. For me it's as personal as my real name now.
CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"Go ahead, make my day"
|
|
|
|
|
only -16? If it weighted, I think that person does not have much report power. It kinda suck because they didn't give you a chance to defend or correct your mistake. Last time I posted a blog and someone  with very high report power down voted it, and that -40 points. Again it suck because I don't know what the issue was, and I don't have the opportunity to rectify it. Sometime I don't see how this down vote WITHOUT comment will help the community or the author/poster. At least give them a chance to fix the issue !!!
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
