|
We don't allow images because we would have to moderate every single question, answer, and forum post to ensure that some idiot doesn't start posting inappropriate images. And that just isn't practical - it's enough work for volunteers to just keep spam off the site! We get a number of trolls, morons, and spammers here - and it wouldn't take much for corporate blacklists to flag the site as "not work related" and ban it from their networks. Which means the very people we are trying to help can't access us!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
When I go to Articles | Search I just get a "Page Title Goes Here" page.
|
|
|
|
|
"This is not the search you are looking for".
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes the little orange dots indicate that a forum has new posts, but the first page of the forum does not contain said posts.
Perhaps we could have a button that brings us to the page of the new posts?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to find the new posts at the moment is to use the forum's search box, and search for * - that will list all of the posts in the forum in descending date order.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It just happened again that an article got approved when it shouldn't have (ref.: Re: Plagiarised would be article - CodeProject[^]).
Suggestion: Once an article in moderation got 1 report of being spam or plagiarized don't publish it after it received 10 approvals but place it in a queue to be decided upon by a protector.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
In this specific case the article (at least according the revision history) never got published...It went from 'pending' to 'closed'...
In any case I would say to notify all those approved an article
1. If already has a spam/plagiarized flag on the article - to let him review it more
2. If approved and later someone flag it as spam/plagiarized
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: In this specific case the article (at least according the revision history) never got published...It went from 'pending' to 'closed'... At least one submission got published - I reported it.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Why I am not receiving any email notification? My email is correct and I am accessing it every day?
Thanks,
Jassim[^]
Technology News @ www.JassimRahma.com
|
|
|
|
|
Have you checked your profile settings or tried resubscribing?
|
|
|
|
|
I checked but I did not try resubscribing..
I will do that...
Technology News @ www.JassimRahma.com
|
|
|
|
|
Deactivated users should be able to login the system with following limited privileges:
1. They should be able to discuss why they were deactivated and appeal against the decision
2. They should be able to delete their articles
|
|
|
|
|
panboza wrote: 1. They should be able to discuss why they were deactivated and appeal against the decision They can email the CP Admin to do this. There is no need to keep a dead account available.panboza wrote: 2. They should be able to delete their articles The CP team can do this.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
The ways to contact the CP Admin about those subjects should be mentioned in closing message.
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't know what was in the closing message - I've never done anything worthy of having my account closed, or articles rejected.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
We can arrange a closing message for you, if you are interested...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Fill your boots mate.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
webmaster@codeproject.com
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The author of the rejected article should be able to talk about the reasons why the article was rejected with the moderators.
|
|
|
|
|
How would this work? Would the author be contacting the people who rejected the article (there are lots of people who have the privilege)? A better bet is to raise the issue in the Article Writing forum.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
There was considerable discussion (including comments at your your article) which it seems you did not join in with.
Just repost with some new 'contents' ? - CodeProject[^]
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
modified 9-Feb-16 9:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
Your link doesn't point to a specific thread or message, just a page on the forum.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Amended.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Member Profile - CodeProject[^]
This member posted a joke, that had the exact bearing of a spam, and for that the post and the account removed...
I think that in this case it would be appropriate to reopen the account...
Your call @chris-maunder...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Ironically, it was spam. Who knew? Oh wait, those of us who voted to have it closed in the first place.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|