|
And the notifications (red bubble up top): are you seeing 1 or 2 notifications for each comment?
(and thank you. I'll be in my office banging my head against a wall)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Was seeing 2 but now seeing 1.
EDIT: 2 notifications (red bubble) for k5054's response to my latest comment, one titled "CodeProject A comment has been added", and another one titled "A reply has been posted to a comment". Also emails with the same titles. Only one email and notification for Solution 2.
modified 15-Jun-22 13:23pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting duplicate notifications.
I'm also getting email notifications when I post a reply to a comment on one of my own answers. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it would appear so:
The first one:
The duplicate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I'll address this right away.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed. This one had a few tentacles wriggling throughout the code. Thanks the report.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
If I click on my username, I see the "Sign out from other places" button. So I click on it and log back in, only to see it again. This happens even if I close my browser in between.
EDIT: No longer there today.
modified 7-Jun-22 7:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
A change in points for file download in articles ?
I was used to get 1 point per download.
Suddenly, download reputation point is weighted ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
modified 5-Jun-22 18:56pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I also noticed a weighted download recently, but I have no idea how long it's been that way.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this has been posted before, but there appears to be a bug in membership length. According to the site's reputation tab, when viewing one's own stats, I've been a member since 2003. I know that this is wrong.
modified 6-Sep-22 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll have a look.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject says it all, too  (sorry... it was too tempting)
On a more serious side... I am not aware on any methode within CP to block people. You can deactivate the notices or do something in your email client if you don't want to deactivate the messages about replies and so on.
The best (only?) way is, you ignore that user and don't even read what he/she writes.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Then it should be a suggestion to moderators to make CP better.
|
|
|
|
|
I see your point and I would have used it one or two times if it were available.
But I am not sure how difficult will it be, how will affect the layout of the forums and if it is worth the efforts.
The site is already over 20 years there and not a real necessity until now.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be simple, add a block button on their profile page. Once a user clicks, they would no longer see each others comments or posts
|
|
|
|
|
Well... being user here I would suppose that you know it is not that simple.
Let's wait and see what the hamsters say.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
... how about drop a few sugar cubes in your cup of joe and soldier on ...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm the type of person to fix problems,not ignore them.
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't be fixing the issue to solve the problem with that person and not having to need the block?
Sorry... it was too tempting.
I'll get my coat and show me the way out myself.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I thoroughly support your question, and you're right to ask it!
EDIT CLARIFICATION: This post was directed toward Nelek's comment, not the other guy's.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
modified 6-Jun-22 18:30pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I generally am too, but I'm also the type of person who balances resources, costs, and how this will affect the overall user experience.
We've had this request one or two times, and while adding a table that links users and blocked users is easy, it does affect system performance due to our caching.
We could
- do a custom query, right at the database level, for every user who has an active block list, in order to return just the messages that are viewable
- get messages from the cache(s) as we do now, and simple mask out the items that are blocked.
The first option is the best, except it will kill performance.
The second is easy to implement, but if a user has blocked lots of people their pages could look pretty bad. The noise to signal ratio could make the experience a little rough.
An alternative is to get a page of messages from the cache, prune out the blocked messages, then keep requesting pages from the cache until we have a "full" page. Faster, better, messier for us, but doable.
But there's another issue with option #2 (and 2a). You'll be left with gaps in the thread view. You'll see responses that don't relate to a message you see. You'll see quotes of blocked messages, which can become a can of worms to hide, and relegates option 1 as the most practical solution.
Now having said all this, we get this request maybe once every few years. There are simply too many other things we'd like to add / fix / improve. If there was a clamouring demand we'd bump it up, but at this point it's not in our shortlist.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
