|
Hi Rohan,
I think your idea is practical in the sense it puts the burden for the work of "resurrection" of closed posts onto the membership, rather than CP staff.
Another "thorny" issue I see is: how one can change the behavior of certain very high-rep frequent QA respondents who post frequent "solutions" that are nothing more than "sermons," or "lectures," that, at best, fumigate with technical rhetoric and very general advice the OP's question. That such "solutions" seem to almost auto-magically get a 5 vote within minutes of their posting is an interesting phenom.
I am as concerned about the issue of how we "elevate" excellent, stand-out, content so it "floats above" the great churning cosmic ocean of "other."
Does the rating/rep system as it is now encourage/enable that optimally ?
cheers, Bill
«To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"
|
|
|
|
|
Bob
in teddy bear form.
I would definitely buy one ! (for my son of course )
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if a 3D-incarnation of Bob could be G-rated
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
G-rated = appropriate for children, as opposed to X-rated
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
ah... .
Not sure why you think that, but I doubt it would be a problem
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Moderator,
Whenever, I tried to cast my vote for article or forum reply, I am getting:
Someone at your IP address has already voted for this item
Not understand, why it is coming. I am using a public computer from Cyber Café. My doubt is that all systems are having same IP. If it is so. Does this mean I never cast a vote or if I cast my vote then someone else who will be sitting on the same system would not be able to cast the vote.
Any suggestion!
|
|
|
|
|
I believe this message is delivering accurate information. Someone at that Cyber Cafe must really like the same articles as you.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I believe this message is delivering accurate information. Someone at that Cyber Cafe must really like the same articles as you.
I agreed with you. I just asked one fellow sitting next to my system and I am able to replicate this.
My question - isn't it negative for a writer who submitted the article. I know writers are doing best at Code project and by casting a vote people like me are encourage their work.
Suppose in a day 5 persons tried for vote a same article and actually only one person able to vote successfully, which means that article got loss of 4 votes (loss is not monetary meaning here).
|
|
|
|
|
The system is designed the way it is so that people can't cheat their votes. We continually make changes to the voting system to make sure it is as fair as possible and accurate to members reading those articles.
I have no doubt that the good articles by our talented authors will be receive plenty of legitimate votes.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I don't want to debate here. But, I am still in doubt.
Anyways, thanks a ton for quick reply.
|
|
|
|
|
The probability that several developers visit CP from the same Ciber Cafe is much, much, much, but very much lower than the probability of people trying to fool the system and farm reputation in a not legitime way (i.e. socket puppets)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot vote but you can comment. If I were you, I'd post a comment praising the author, his article, and just be very aggressive in suggesting that the article helped you change your life. I think that'd be more valuable to the author than a second vote from that same IP address.
|
|
|
|
|
As my sig says
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Moderator,
I would like to see the feature of mentorship.
Is it possible that someone send a request via CopeProject to add members into there Code Project profiles so, great leader of CP (authors), which provides mentoring, can be added by new members or those who are seeking any mentorship.
Can we see something like 'Mentor' badge on CP profiles?
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at the profile of a member you can tell if he/she is a mentor...Look for this: mentor[^]
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks I got it. But, is there any feature which provides the facility to add that Mentor in my profile.
Searching a mentor is a pain by looking a badge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to change it, but it didn't take. I let Sean fix it tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks anyway. It's the second time this happens to this particular blog. Very strange, but Sean was able to fix it last time
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I moved my blog from sanderrossel.wordpress.com to my self hosted sanderrossel.com. Quite the hassle. So I'm now manually changing all links to my old blog so that they refer to my new blog.
There's one thing I can't quite figure out though, and that's the Add comment or Comments: n part on the bottom of my blogs here on CodeProject. How can I change those so that they actually link to my new blog?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't understand you...Do you want that the comments in CP will be on your blog too? It doesn't work that way...CP consuming your blog by do a one time copy of your post when you publish them...It is a one-direction connection...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|