|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Those lucky messages that survive the moderation displays age from the release date
This was done because we decided a message was "posted" when it was released, not when it was written and held in the pending queue.
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: but in the list of siblings according the original post date...
List of siblings? Not sure what you mean.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: My post is 'younger' than that of OG (because it went into moderation), but still listed before (it was truly posted before)...It confusing
Fixed (for the future)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think so - thanks mate, Chris has dealt with it - hopefully Ive helped her and not stuffed up anything
|
|
|
|
|
It's back in the pending queue and will be available soon
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
thanks - wasn't sure how to help her - next time she can do her own barking
|
|
|
|
|
I posted a reply in the lounge and there was no error, but the message did not show up in the thread. I tried it again and got the same result. On checking my messages, it shows the two messages as 'not publicly visible'.
Wazzup?
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Spam filter...Since yesterday it got a bit crazy...
In second thought - and in your case - it come to its senses...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You are clearly a spammer, so they went to the spam moderation queue.
Matthew is working on it...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Wazzup? The new "FigLeaf" filter from iShaltKnowShame.va considers Hungarians inherently naked and has done the necessary ?
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
If this gets through while all of Baba's posts are fed to the Hamsters, then the filter's fine.
I think that while having a rum-baba, or several, while playing the original Desi Arnaz' rendition of "Babalou" in duet with his young son, Ricky: [^].
I will contemplate the current fearful ascendancy of the evil star Ketu's influence on CodeProject's web-site, hoping that the even more dreadful Rahu is not nearing its antipodal proximity to Earth, signifying an even more sinister misfortune.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Or worse: if Bel-Shamharoth rises, we'll all have to use Octal for the rest of our miserable lives...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Just think in which mess I'd find myself with the nickname containing not one but TWO numbers that are two times four!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
No more fermented coconut juice for Bill. He's had enough for one night.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My reputation list shows freshly posted messages as undo of themselves...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. Two posts, one to the Lounge, one to Insider News, led to hamsters-chewing-motherboards page, and then were undone with one point deducted from my rep.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
But the post are actually there (maybe with a little delay, but today all move slow)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I just noticed the posts had re-appeared, except for the previous post to this one which was an update to this thread saying the problem had, evidently, been fixed
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Approving all you guy's messages..
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Very kind of you...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Update: both messages that failed to post initially have now been posted.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I'm approving messages as fast as I can!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|