|
A fixed, but then fixed properly, and then the fix reversed because the original fix was no longer necessary. But then fixed properly.
Think of it as needing to match the braces. We had an open brace in our sequence of fixes.
And damn you Outlook. Damn you and your ilk for the woes bestow'd upon us.
(Yeah - my 29GB PST file finally went thermonuclear today so my email is on the fritz while it rebuilds. Because large databases are so incredibly difficult to handle in 2014...)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
29GB PST?
Someone needs to start pruning and archiving!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Not as bad as the time I had a 698GB Windows Search index file, thanks to a bug in the system.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to see a list of or find the submitted video articles?
|
|
|
|
|
You mean articles with videos, or the no-longer-on-this-mortal-coil video article type?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The later.
As in the statement in the Article FAQ point 20, which reads;
"If you wish to submit an article that is purely a video we do support flash or silverlight videos. However, you must have the SWF or FLV file hosted on a server that allows streaming. Simply choose video from change the type of post:"
And the last sentence in the Submission guidelines that states;
"Video Article Submissions
Please ensure that video articles are less than 20 minutes long, preferably 10 minutes or less."
I think I came across one once many years ago, so curious if there are any others.
|
|
|
|
|
Turns out we don't actually have any video articles at all. I've removed the offending line in the guidelines.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, definitely remember seeing one....ah well, we shall never mention them again.
|
|
|
|
|
The (fairly) new "Go to top" button that floats along as your scroll through an article has a transparent area above the button. When you reach the end of the article, that area covers up the Permalink and Advertise links in the bottom left corner of the articles making those un-clickable.
Well, sometimes the area is transparent and you can see the links, but sometimes they are not visible at all.
Resizing the browser does not help - the widget really wants to sit on top of those links.
When I open an article from a search, I almost always jump to the bottom and hit Permalink to collapse the forum threads, reset the search keywords and hide the top area (suggestions). I cannot do that anymore .
Browser:
- IE 11 on Windows 7.
- Chrome [38.0.2125.101 m] on Windows 7.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Try now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Better. Thanks.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
See below post, http://www.codeproject.com/suggestions.aspx?msg=4922009#xx4922009xx[^]
Can't mark it as spam/abusive. I suppose if CP monitors this forum someone internal can just delete it but this is the first I noticed mark as spam/abusive is not available in this forum.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I am actually missing the red flag all over the B&S forum right now.
Hamster playing?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Any time I try to open a message, either by clicking on it or using the Ctrl+arrow shortcuts, the tab crashes and needs to be reloaded. It doesn't appear to happen on any other forums on the site, or even on page 2+ in the lounge.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
The mysteries surrounding the stability of IE are beyond my ken.
I also can't replicate the issue you're seeing on IE 8, 10 or 11.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh. I'd blame corporate level filtering for doing something to it (something is eating CPs top banners, and I don't have adblock installed in IE); since they're normally to blame. I can't imagine how it could only be breaking things there though...
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
And it's just as suddenly started working again.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Your survey is broken!
HeaderTxt: in the description
Choose all that you think will apply - and you have a radio/option button rather than a checkbox
A spare semi colon in the first option
And wearble need attention
And I am NOT a known pedant!
[edit] Reposted as I realised it should have been here not the results [/edit]
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: A spare semi colon in the first option FTFY.Mycroft Holmes wrote: And I am NOT a known pedant! Nor am I.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Smartass - short of getting out the magnifying glass I can't see the difference between the 2 colons, thankfully they require a shift when typing and I'm so lazy I dislike using shift.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, missing option:
None of above
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That was a debacle from start to finish.
Long Story: the survey was posted smack in the middle of a deploy (awesome timing) and it broke. I tried to resurrect by being clever instead of starting from scratch and, well, you saw the results of that.
It's been scrapped and a new one taken off the shelf and out of the wrapper.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have deleted the article which I had posted here in Code project that was conflicting with my own blog article.
I hope the article will be consumed from my blog:Link to my Blog Article[^]
Thanks. Awaiting for my first article on Code project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was experimenting with creating new account-but immediately
deleted the new account using link I received by mail. Now, when
I try to create new account using that email (which I used above)
it tells me user already exists with that email. Why? is that
expected behaviour? Or I need to wait some time?
hello? any help? I can't create new account
using that (old) email? Although I deleted old account?
modified 13-Oct-14 5:11am.
|
|
|
|