|
Not sure what does that mean because my article was already published and I got a message from the team as well regarding this. Many readers who visited my article are complaining of the image issue as well. Had it not been published none of the readers would have been facing the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
He means that the new version of your article is currently in the moderation queue, and needs to be approved by the community before it gets published (and on this new version, the images are displayed fine).
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever you update the Article or submit a new one,it doesn't directly get published. It will first come into moderation queue where Members with sufficient previleges will approve it. The Article will be publicly available after 5 such approval.
Your updated Article is in Moderation queue. All the images are displayed properly. It will be published shortly.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Spam messages in some of the forums are not getting deleted after enough reports. Chris, will you please look into this on priority bases,if possible?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
When my blog post[^] got pulled, I edited it to improve category, tags and formatting. But when publishing, it turned into an article (and I didn't select another value in the dropdown). I could fix it by updating my article, selecting "Technical Blog" in the dropdown and adding the URL of my original blog post.
Could you please look into this issue?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
As per the title. Why? Sock Puppets?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Chill60's series of "Random xkcd to push the spam off the front page" messages where removed because they were junk posts meant to remove a spam message. I removed the spam message and so these (essentially placeholder) messages (and their entire threads) were just noise.
I'm not meaning to offend or judge - just trying to keep the place tidy. I'm the janitor around here...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, OK.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Ah!
Thanks for that - was just surprised to see "Posted span or abusive message" hits in my "Latest reputation" summary, and trying to find out why, and how it offended someone that badly.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
If you saw that then it wasn't me. I merely hit the "Go Nucular" [sic] button, not the Report button.
I checked your rep and I can see a "-1 point" for the removal of the message in the thread that was nuked, but nothing around a spam report against you.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Two "dings" at 04:55 yesterday: https://www.dropbox.com/s/uky27pqk9r6bm6p/Screenshot%202014-07-06%2013.31.07.png[^]
No points off (not that it would matter) - I just like to know how I've annoyed people!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
22444 "Red points" (aka pending notifications) . I wonder if that is yet another record .
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I'd have more if the system hadn't decided not to send emails / notifications for replies in QA for a while!
(BTW: 22532 today, but I'm working on finding out when it rolls over )
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Not offended!!
Now OG has let me know about the caching I'll be more patient
|
|
|
|
|
|
I moved my technical blog to a new location a couple of days ago.
I also imported the posts from the old blog. When I registered it with CodeProject, I forgot to remove the magic rel="tag" links from about 10 old posts and 3 of those were pulled onto CodeProject. The 3 posts that were chosen seemed to be chosen at random; 1 new post was not included. I immediately removed rel="tag" from the old posts and deleted the 3 duplicate posts from CodeProject.
I have now posted 3 new articles, two of which are a day old, and CodeProject is ignoring them. Ideas?
Location: Blog index is here[^], Atom is here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Looks pretty solid to me. Could you please try one thing for me? When you post your blog feed URL on CodeProject, can you please try putting "?alt=rss" at the end of it?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Just to confirm I understand what you're asking, do you want me to go to the feed page and change
http://loyc.net/atom.xml
to
http://loyc.net/atom.xml?alt=rss ?
I'm sure the Jekyll web server will ignore the parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
Precisely, if you please.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Well, nothing appears to have changed after 24 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess it did not work. Thank you kindly for trying that.
I tried giving the aggregator another kick, but sadly, it does not seem to be working. I have requested a higher power to give the aggregator a bigger boot kick and take a peek.
Please change the RSS back if that same URL was working before, so when the boot kick comes it will be ready.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Has someone looked into this yet?
|
|
|
|
|
I currently live in Colombia, and here the do not have postal codes. I know, that's pretty uncommon, but they really do not have this system. The "Professional Profile" is not complete without this, so (as with many other sites) I had to just fill in something else.
Some sites have a check box "I do not have a postal code", which would make things more reliable I guess. Another option is to make this a non-required field, or based on the country selected making this a required field or not. Lastly, you can just leave it as it is, and people from some countries will just will in something random.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
Almost.
Turns out there are 60 countries that don't use postcodes (who knew!) and I ensured that they are all treated appropriately. Turns out, however, that the list I found didn't include Colombia. So: added.
And thanks.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The Tip/Trick approval popup does not have image offsite report as an option like the 'full' article popup does.
|
|
|
|