|
Chris Maunder wrote: No sig. OK, looks like a regression. Will fix. Thanks! It also seems to have disappeared from "My Settings".
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Turns out I didn't have a sig.
Did you have a sig before you replied, and then the sig was deleted from your profile?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I've always had a sig (see my message history). This could be related to the bug that causes unintended nulling of some user properties. This occured to me (and others) a few days ago.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] is the earlier regression I was alluding to.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
That's a different issue. And one that was logically impossible as well. As all software bugs are...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I reckon to have lost my sig earlier this year already (got myself a new one) and I also reckon you having lost your sig earlier this year, already.
The scariest moment is always just before the Start - Stephen King Die Frauen warten auf die Liebe, und die Männer warten auf die Frauen - Wolf Wondratschek
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: .and look at that! No sig. OK, looks like a regression. Will fix.)
I told you! (See my post above yours)
The scariest moment is always just before the Start - Stephen King Die Frauen warten auf die Liebe, und die Männer warten auf die Frauen - Wolf Wondratschek
|
|
|
|
|
Yep.
But now my sig stubbornly refuses to get lost.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I lost mine only once this year - Did you change your profile settings after Jan 1st?
The scariest moment is always just before the Start - Stephen King Die Frauen warten auf die Liebe, und die Männer warten auf die Frauen - Wolf Wondratschek
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt it. Anything's possible after a couple of reds, though...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried it out - searching there is probably lost time.
The scariest moment is always just before the Start - Stephen King Die Frauen warten auf die Liebe, und die Männer warten auf die Frauen - Wolf Wondratschek
|
|
|
|
|
Can it get lost if you are composing a messages, accidentally click "Click to edit signature" and somehow remove it? I lost my sig at some point a few months ago and I figured that is what my fat fingers had done while using my phone.
[BTW, I am testing that thought with this post]
[EDIT]
I guess not, it looks like the sig is there when I go to post a new message.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
[/EDIT]
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: ...and look at that! No sig. OK, looks like a regression. Will fix.) The task list shows this bug as "Unable to repro", yet I just repro'd it[^] a few seconds ago.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I re-added my sig to my profile (Forums tab). The sig now shows up in the message editor but only when I add some content. Previously, the preview always displayed the signature. IMHO, that's a bug not a feature.
Also, the disappearance of my sig (and some aspect of my professional profile - which caused me to lose my Professional icon - is also a bug).
Thanks,
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
The message preview only starts when you start adding content. Your sig isn't content.
The loss of Profeessional status is on the TODO list[^].
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If the original poster decided to delete their question, I don't think anything can be done about that (?), but if someone else deleted this QA question: [^], then I protest.
The post may have been a re-post of this by the same poster: [^].
The OP asked a reasonable question about drawing a graph-paper like background. There was already one pretty good answer posted showing how to this with the GDI+ and the Paint Event in Win Forms, a response I had upvoted.
And, I spent fifteen-minutes writing up a detailed answer showing how to use freely available public-domain grid-pattern files to quickly construct 24-bit .png files with transparency that are very small in size, and use those as background images.
Now, I can't find my answer to archive it for my files.
“The best hope is that one of these days the Ground will get disgusted enough just to walk away ~ leaving people with nothing more to stand ON than what they have so bloody well stood FOR up to now.” Kenneth Patchen, Poet
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with you on this - Spam and *very* poor gimme codez posts should be cleaned [talking about one or three line questions, without existing code posted] - All others shall stay where they are. Even then I think *deleting* is the wrong way, can't we just close it [content is still displayed, but no comments and answers can be posted].
The scariest moment is always just before the Start - Stephen King Die Frauen warten auf die Liebe, und die Männer warten auf die Frauen - Wolf Wondratschek
|
|
|
|
|
I totally agree, so +5!
However, there is a way to get back an answer to a deleted question:
- You have a link. Is it a link to a question? Go to step 2. Is it a link to an answer? Go to step 5.
- Find the question ID of the question. It's the number in the URL.
- Go to
/script/Articles/ListAlternatives.aspx?aid=<question ID> - Choose your answer. You'll go to a page that shows "Sorry, the item you requested could not be found."
- Now, find the answer ID. It will be the number in the URL in the address bar.
- Go to
/script/Articles/ListVersions.aspx?aid=<answer ID> . There are all revisions of your answer listed. - Go to the latest revision and there you'll see your answer.
So, for you, your answer is here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for this ! yours, Bill
“The best hope is that one of these days the Ground will get disgusted enough just to walk away ~ leaving people with nothing more to stand ON than what they have so bloody well stood FOR up to now.” Kenneth Patchen, Poet
|
|
|
|
|
I feel for you and agree it is a problem, but don't forget that spammers sometimes post a Question and then post spammy Answers to that question.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
How do we provide a mechanism to let members clean out the spam that also prevents them from deleting questions that some feel should not be deleted?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
today i was checking my reputation list and what i found that it shows page 1 of 70 but when i clicked on last page there was nothing.
then i move to one page previous still nothing ...
now i click on page 10 it shows me data and page number upto 14 .
now i click on page 14 there is nothing..but if i click on page 13 it shows some data..with page no upto 17 but no data after page number 13.
may be you guys have removed old data and archived that but page number still shows the same number of count which i think should be rectify.
Ravi Khoda
|
|
|
|
|
|
oh okay. great.
Ravi Khoda
|
|
|
|
|
...is very useful, but...could we use a different symbol (or better, a combination of symbols)
SQL Parameters are often prefixed by an atsign, and this question[^] just accidentally emailed six members...
How about !OriginalGriff! or similar? A lot less likely to be used accidentally.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|