|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: This is controlled by your mail client, the sender cannot change it. Huh!?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean by "Huh"?. Messages are marked as read when you preview them or read them, according to the settings in your email client. It has nothing to do with the content of the message. However, if I misunderstood, then it is possible that this was not your question.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: if I misunderstood, That seems to be the case.
You're talking about email messages read by my email client. I'm talking about CP's unread message list maintained on CP's server. Clicking the link at the CP website should clear the unread bit in the CP database.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
What on earth are you talking about? You don't click on CodeProject's website to read email messages, you read them in your own email client.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: You don't click on CodeProject's website to read email messages, you read them in your own email client. You need to pay closer attention to your email messages.
See the link at the end of the message that says "To reply, click here."? That opens the reply at CP's site. At that point, CP knows (a) who you are and (b) that you've just read a CP message that's marked unread in CP's database. The server should clear the post's unread bit, because the post is no longer unread.
Clear enough now?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: You need to pay closer attention to your email messages. You obviously don't understand how email works. The unread flag is held in your inbox not in CodeProject's database, also there is no connection between the two.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
I think Ravi means that CP should mark the red CP notification at the top of the page as read, if you click on the link to the same message/question/... from your mail message.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
<sigh> Let it go, Richard. You clearly have no idea what I'm talking about...
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: You clearly have no idea what I'm talking about. Exactly so, a clearer explanation may have helped.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Now that is a feature that could be sold $$$ to spammers. Let me know if a solution is found to that, relying on other technology than telekinesis.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Let me know if a solution is found to that, relying on other technology than telekinesis. Looks like you both have misunderstood my point.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I think I understand your point: if you click on the link to a message/question/answer/... in your mail message, CP should mark the red notification (referring to that message/question/...) at the top of the page as read, right?
If you mean that, then I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
He does.
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
There are also other bugs related to the unread posts counter that I'm investigating. Will post an analysis soon.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
That would be nice.
FOR EVERYONE ELSE: THERE IS A LINK AT THE END OF REPLY EMAILS THAT TAKES YOU TO THE MESSAGE THAT PROMPTED THE REPLY. CLICKING THAT SHOULD CLEAR THE UNREAD FLAG. RAVI IS NOT TALKING ABOUT MESSAGES IN HIS EMAIL CLIENT!
Gawd, people can be thick sometimes, can't they?
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Now, now...
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: CLICKING THAT SHOULD CLEAR THE UNREAD FLAG. RAVI IS NOT TALKING ABOUT MESSAGES IN HIS EMAIL CLIENT! Which unread flag, and why didn't he say so?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: <layer>Which unread flag, and why didn't he say so? The post's unread flag. I did. Can't help it if you chose to not read the entire post.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: The post's unread flag. Quite, which would, to most people, refer to the flag maintained by one's email client.
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: Can't help it if you chose to not read the entire post. I did read it, but nowhere did you mention that you were referring to the drop down list that appears when you click on the little number to the left of your name in a CodeProject window. Which, for the record stated:
Quote: When I receive an email notification of a reply to my post, I click the link in the message to view the reply. However, my list of unread messages remains unchanged, requiring me to have to manually clear the unread flag. Clicking the link in the email should clear the post's unread flag.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: which would, to most people, refer to the flag maintained by one's email client. Really? I've never known anyone refer to an entry in an email client's list of messages as a "post".
Richard MacCutchan wrote: nowhere did you mention that you were referring to the drop down list that appears... I wasn't. I was referring to the list of unread posts shown when you click on the number - i.e. the UI where you manually mark some (or all) posts as being read.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: I've never known anyone refer to an entry in an email client's list of messages as a "post". Well you're obviously not British.
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: I was referring to the list of unread posts shown when you click on the number Well perhaps you should have said so in the first place. I'm afraid my crystal ball is a bit cloudy today.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Well you're obviously not British. Ah... I see your confusion. When I was a kid I used to refer to snail mail as "post", but after having moved to the US (several decades ago) refer to is as just "mail".
But I've never encountered a software engineer (British or otherwise) to confuse the noun "post" (which is accepted terminology for a message in a forum) with an email message, until now.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't confused, but your title and content was ambiguous.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I surmised you found the title and content of my post (BTW, by "post" I mean my entry in this forum, not an email message I may or may not have sent) to be ambiguous.
/ravi
|
|
|
|