|
Manfred R. Bihy wrote: They probably get their revenue by how much adverts they push out.
Advertisers are companies trying to sell their product. The more they can show ads to those interested, and the less they show ads to those who aren't interested, the better. I think there's a tendency to forget that a software company is just a bunch of guys like you and I who believe in what they do and just want to talk to those whose problem they are trying to solve.
Manfred R. Bihy wrote: once in a while an ad can turn your attention to something you'd otherwise have missed
Exactly. And this is also a reason that choosing an ad based on what someone says they like isn't always accurate.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Internet Explorer crashes:
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: iexplore.exe
Application Version: 10.0.9200.16635
Application Timestamp: 51b7a8e3
Fault Module Name: MSHTML.dll
Fault Module Version: 10.0.9200.16635
Fault Module Timestamp: 51b7ad9b
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 0000000000e0a334
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1053
Additional Information 1: 1ed5
Additional Information 2: 1ed50b14860339d2e2a7eb3500b88794
Additional Information 3: e11b
Additional Information 4: e11b3e7422018a896cad7f3935e04518
Can't debug in Visual studio. I get:
Unhandled exception at 0x000007feeb9fa334 in iexplore.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x0000000000000000.
Works fine in Chrome.
Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
|
|
I posted a previous message saying that early versions of IE10 were easy to crash, but it looks like you have the latest. I'm not seeing the issue on any installs of IE10 or 11 on my machines.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be just the database forum if that's any help. But I haven't tested all forums just about half of them.
Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
|
|
FYI, Now it works again.
Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
|
|
In the Q&A section, Top Experts (both 24 hour and monthly) starts at #0, I figured its everybody's goal to be #1, and here all along people been telling me I'm a zero and taking it as an insult
|
|
|
|
|
What number does an array index start from.
Maybe the joke is getting old...
|
|
|
|
|
ucancode.net advert[^]
Not sure if that's one from developermedia or something through google, but looks like somebody took a screen shot of a word document and didn't bother to remove the formatting/spell check hints...
|
|
|
|
|
Where did you see this ad? On an article on CodeProject?
I'll let the AdOps team know. Thanks for the heads-up.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It shows up on the side in the Q&A section, above the Top Experts panels.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Ron!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please clarify what you mean?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Why this much emoticons?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
ha ha ha sry should i remove??
|
|
|
|
|
The timestamps on reputation points seem to be 1 hour earlier than when they actually occurred (at least here in PDT). For example, when I post a comment, it shows up as posted 1 hour earlier. Not a big deal of course. But in case you feel like taking a look.... This comment will appear to be posted at 11:18 AM, but really it's 12:18PM here.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you in daylight saving hours? I think theres a box you can tick in the settings when you select your time zone.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it is dst here, and I do have the box checked in my settings. So that appears not to be working.
On a separate but related note, why would you need a "Are you currently in Daylight Savings Time?" checkbox? Wouldn't that require the user to update his settings twice a year? Other sites don't require this that I know of, and I'd think that local time offset from UTC (including any local daylight savings time offsets) would be readily available.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is really a good idea or not, but figured I post it here for discussion at least. I sometimes feel bad when a newbie asks a question in quick answers and gets voted down because they haven't tried google yet or they didn't include their code. These downvotes do not always include a comment that explains why. I imagine that the newbie might get discouraged and decide not to try posting again because of down votes. Perhaps newbies could get temporary immunity? Like the first five questions they ask cannot be downvoted. Or for their first month of being a code project member the questions cannot be downvoted?...just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
But in that case, questions can still be reported (as "Unclear or Incomplete" for example). If a question of a new user gets closed, he might also get discouraged (and removing the report flag for the first 5 posts is a bad idea, then we wouldn't be able to report spam).
So it will still be the same: you can't downvote -> you report as "Unclear or Incomplete" -> question gets closed after 3 reports -> user gets discouraged.
Another problem: in cases of downvoting the user could know that his question was bad and then he can learn which questions are good and which are bad. If you disable downvoting for a month, then a new user can keep posting very bad questions and then he doesn't know that his questions are bad.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree about not taking off the report flag...I never meant to suggest that THAT should be removed.
With regard to your second paragraph, I think that's exactly the scenario that I'm thinking of. But I disagree that a downvote "teaches" the newbie that they have a bad question. It's not as constructive as posting a comment that explains what the question is missing. And if downvoting were shutdown for a month, I'm pretty sure a newbie would still get the message via comments. We don't seem to be shy to patronize posters don't google first or include their code in the question.
|
|
|
|
|
You're right, new users can get the message via comments, but there're still some other points:
- The first post of new users can be more than a month later than they created an account.
- If you disable downvoting for the first 5 posts, then perhaps some new users stop posting questions after they've posted 5 questions, because they've fear of getting downvoted.
- People will report a bad question faster because they can't downvote it. I think closing a question is more discouraging than getting downvoted.
|
|
|
|
|
We need a :shrug:[^] emoticon!
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
That's it: all dev work is on hold while we attend to this.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
An initial downvote, even after several consequent upvotes lift the score to 4.94 keeps the post coloured grey
An initial Upvote does not keep it green though after several downvotes
It is a paradox that paradoxes would actually exist in reality.
That means of course that they don't exist.
However, they do!
∫(Edo )dx = Tzumer
∑k( this.Kid) k = this. ♥
modified 1-Aug-13 9:42am.
|
|
|
|