|
Is there a specific article that's showing a problem?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the one I posted yesterday for sure:
Anagrams2 - A Simple WPF Game Application[^]
I haven't looked at any others.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen this as well on other articles, including John's. (Chrome)
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I saw a message on the Lounge section and wanted to share it here to draw attention to that opinion. Isn't it a good idea to hide vote counters until related surveys expire? (only for "Best Article" surveys)
|
|
|
|
|
No, I think it's fair to show results.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it is. Please do not misunderstand me...
I thought number of votes can influence users' choice.
And also we can guess winners before surveys expired. This is not exciting .
But ok, you didn't like that idea. I have nothing to say
|
|
|
|
|
I definitely think that this should be done. Otherwise the results will never be fair.
“Milletler birleşince refaha, ayrılınca da fakru zarurete düçar olurlar”
Nuri Demirağ, 1954
|
|
|
|
|
There's no reason to impress someone else using vote, closed voting system used in elections held in many countries. Of course, there's a reason. Because in order to prevent it.
“Milletler birleşince refaha, ayrılınca da fakru zarurete düçar olurlar”
Nuri Demirağ, 1954
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Huseyin,
Can you explain how votes can be manipulated when the results are displayed after you submitted your own vote ?
Cheers
- MB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huseyin Atasoy wrote: I think this is what most users do.
Only if they are sheep. It isn't a popularity contest.
Take the time to actually read the articles first. Don't bother voting if you haven't read them.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, you won
But nobody can read all of them. In fact I always evaluate the work not the article. If the work is good, the article is not important for me.
Anyway, thank you for sharing your opinion...
|
|
|
|
|
Can i upload more than one app for App Innovation Contest
|
|
|
|
|
Don't see anything to say you cannot.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
thanq
|
|
|
|
|
The Ad section on the top bar, next to the logo is currently left aligned. which leaves white space (actually orange space) on the right. This looks bit odd, can we right align the AD, just like old times. so that we have that white/orange space between logo and ad.
I have tried in Chome v22 ( ), FF v16.
Current View[^] vs Suggestion[^]
Just a thought.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I'll leave it where it is.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
shouldn't code project have these 2 sections? and also there is .net 4.5 and visual studio 2012 and the new features that came with these out there.
What does others think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
i was referring more to the article section, there i didn't saw them, sry for this little misunderstanting
|
|
|
|
|
Oh Ok.
Article sections are much more generalized. so I would guess 'Desktop Development' and 'Platforms, Frameworks & Libraries' are fit for all those 4 category.
But still I think we need a sub-section for 'Windows 8 Metro Style Development' (which is not even called Metro anymore).
|
|
|
|
|
I want to update only 3 lines in a file related with one of my articles. It is an important update for the file. But I have to update the whole article in order to update a file and all updated articles are listed under "Latest Articles". I don't want it to be seen as an attempt to push up the article on the main page
I think minor revisions should be ignored and after a minor change an article shouldn't be listed under "Latest Articles" on the main page.
What do you think about that?
Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree - if this is a change to the source, then it is a change to the article, and that gives people who are using your code a clue that perhaps they should look at the latest version.
Suppose your change is a bug fix to the code: that doesn't need any changes to the article text (expect as revision notes in the "history" section) but it could be significant for users who have incorporated your code into a project.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, this was not a good idea...
|
|
|
|