|
Ah. Well, I guess it will be back when you least expect it.
|
|
|
|
|
It's gone for me at the moment.
Maybe you saw it going back and forth because they removed it (for whatever reason) and you are seeing a cached version on occassion.
|
|
|
|
|
And now I can see it again.
|
|
|
|
|
Message ID
When I post several messages in a thread, it is impossible to tell which of those messages got an upvote in my reputation list (just shows the message title). If a message ID were also shown in the reputation list, I wouldn't have to click all of them to know they are the same message.
Short Message ID
Even better would be if this message ID started from 0 for each thread (that way, I'm not comparing 12340845 to 12340945... I'm comparing 5 to 25). If you already have an ID for each message in your database (and if those ID's are generated in an identity column), this could easily be accomplished by subtracting the thread starting message ID from the message ID. Not perfect, but workable most of the time.
Message Time
Alternatively, you could show the time the message itself was posted (in addition to the time of the reputation event). Example: "13:30:23" (1:30PM and 23 seconds). That gives me an equally good point of reference (perhaps even better than the short message ID).
Mouse Hover Not Workable
Currently, I could just mouse over the message URL to see an ID, but then I can't compare two easily (that's a lot of numbers to remember).
|
|
|
|
|
This is a big reworking of the rep system because of the way we store and retrieve this data.
I'm going to have to say "not this month" on this one.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that articles that have been deleted are getting stuck in the "Articles needing approval" window. One good case-in-point, the Utilites for Java article that was deleleted about 4 days ago has been showing up ever since.
|
|
|
|
|
Uhm,
I submitted a tip/trick yesterday (about 20 hours ago) and it's still nowhere to be seen. Haven't recieved an confirmation/status/etc. Am thinking that I must have done something wrong; like NOT reviewing before I posted.
There are a few of these "new method" posts here so, imho, there's evidence of continuous/contiguous conditioned stimulus aversion on the part of some computer automaton
|
|
|
|
|
What's the title (or URL) of the tip you submitted? I've looked at your article list and I see 3 tips, 2 of which are deleted.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Studio 2010 Help: "Add to Favorites" users alert -> copy & paste FIX for broken link of "Favorite"
Really no big thing. And really only about <i>my</i> habits, so ...
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed (for now). More solid fix (ie larger hammer) next week.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It is working now.
Thank you very much for the prompt response.
It's amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
In this very forum, when I hover over a thread-initiator's name, as well as the profile popup I get a text popup identical to that I'd get on hovering the status icon at the left of the line. [please consider this entry for the mangled English award! ]
For example, if I hover on Indivara's name on the "Deleted blogs..." message immediately below, I see his profile AND a "Fixed" text popup.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
I get it [chrome 17.0.963.66 m].
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
The following two seem to be deleted, but persist in the moderation list. Just in case nobody's noticed.
Salute to Master[^]
My Most Spammed Posts[^]
(I'm not objecting to the deletion itself, that was probably by the author)
|
|
|
|
|
|
We experienced a temporary SSL outage due to our certificate supplier revoking CodeProject's SSL certificates. We are still waiting to receive a full report from our supplier as to the full circumstances of this SSL outage, but in the meantime if you are experiencing the error "The server's security certificate is revoked" while using our secure pages for modifying your settings, or for logging on, then it is most likely a caching issue.
To clear SSL state open IE, go to Tools -> Internet Options -> Content -> Clear SSL State
In general, to flush the certificate cache on a machine you use
certutil -setreg chain\ChainCacheResyncFiletime @now
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This question http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/Post.aspx?aid=346823[^] has <pre> tags correctly inserted by the OP - but they show as HTML when you view the question rather than formatting the code.
[edit]The code is formatted correctly in the preview - but not in the QA screen itself[/edit]
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
I just looked at that page and the question was in "edit" mode. I added a CR and pressed the update button and it now looks fine. Something very strange going on there.
[edit]Looking again, it's still in edit mode. Weird![/edit]
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is a bug, but I think so...
I got an email today saying Simon_Whale commented on my tip/trick: One guideline every VB.NET project should follow![^].
However, when I went to see it I noticed two things. First the new comment layout messed up older comments. The comment I seemingly made to my own tip/trick is actually a reply to the comment below it. This looks like a bug.
Second, Simon_Whale's comment wasn't there. Either he deleted it quite fast after posting it (and there was no obvious reason why he should), or it isn't visible for some reason. I can still see the upvote I got in my rep points, so my guess is I can't see it. Is this a bug or am I looking wrong?
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
when you click on the voting at the bottom of the tip, if loads a popup windows and I entered the message there. (sorry was feeling too lazy to enter a message that permanently showed up in the trick)
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
Aren't those supposed to permanently stay there too?
That reminds me... 9 out of 10 times when I use that popup window I get an exception and I've lost my message.
I think it may have to do with the length of the text, because it usually happens when I have actually got something to say
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to suggest the use of a more uniform template for the QA forum.
Instead of giving a person free rain on writing what ever they want, they instead would have to fill out a question form. Where key fields are mandatory for question submission.
I think this might alleviate some of the demanding one liners and the like. I have given some thought to this question and I think if you structure the question process more, then everyone benefits in the long run.
Just a thought.
[edit] i.e
1. subject/question title.
2. brief description of problem or question.
3. research and/or attempts made.
4. code snippets if any.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011) "No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
18 down votes in 3 minutes across many posts.
Hmmm a small penis for sure, but what response do I have?
Perhaps the -2 voter could be asked for his reasons?
I am with Mr Merrens on this one, one can be downvoted but have no recourse, anonymity is a cowardly way of addressing this.
Perhaps the administrators do not wish their own rules to be obeyed.
---------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
English League Tables - Live
|
|
|
|