|
I have stuff on here that's 10 years old. I wouldn't worry about your stuff being dated.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Martin, I went through your article list to see if I could pick out what you would consider dated.
I work in a company that has legacy code going from old vb6 COMs to dotNet4 encompassing every version of studio along the way. Your articles are far from outdated as resources on the older technologies becomes harder and harder to find, so I would agree with Chris that the relevance for your articles is still there.
Cheers
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Most of us who've been here for a while have older articles that are now obsolete. I don't think they need to be deleted. Otherwise we'd only always have articles from the last 2 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Any article can come in handy.
People are always working on all kinds of 'old' technology.
I would request you to let your articles stay (unless you absolutely dont want them to be around).
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
|
|
|
|
|
Just to add my tuppence worth: Sometimes the older articles are the most useful - because when you have a problem there are very few people still using the technology to ask for help...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
See THIS[^] question.
You will see useless
<int><int> at the end of code there.
Now Edit the question and remove both <int><int>, It's showing fine in preview but after updating it comes back again.
Now is it a browser problem ? (Chrome 8.0)
I've seen a lot of time when there is List<String> then it adds <string><string> at the end of code automatically.
above Problem was also with answer given by me yesterday HERE[^].
Someone has deleted my answer(Somebody is misusing his/her power). Was it anything wrong with it ?
Regards,
Hiren.
be good(Help people in CP) ,do good(Vote if one finds helpful) all will happen good, In case happens bad(You are getting downvote for your best try to help OP) it will be good for later after(Countered with more points by humble member). - Gita sar in context of CP.
-So Guys don't care about downvote believe in you.
modified on Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: Now is it a browser problem ?
No. Not a browser problem. Infact not a problem at all.
Have a look at my reply here[^] - similar issue/doubt reported earlier. It's not a bug.
Hiren Solanki wrote: Someone has deleted my answer(Somebody is misusing his/her power). Was it anything wrong with it ?
Just repost your answer again. Looks like, your comment was confusing and you wanted to delete your answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok sandeep it's just an encoding problem.
Sandeep Mewara wrote: Just repost your answer again. Looks like, your comment was confusing and you wanted to delete your answer.
My actual comment was
"I dont know why <string><string> is coming though I am deleting it. please ignore it."
But I have not encoded > and < in my comment so it misprinted like
"I dont know why is coming though I am deleting it. please ignore it."
And some body deleted it.
Ok I know that's not a problem with who deleted that's just Encoded misunderstanding between.
Regards,
Hiren.
be good(Help people in CP),do good(Vote if one finds helpful) all will happen good, In case happens bad(You are getting downvote for your best try to help OP) it will be good for later after(Countered with more points by humble member). - Gita sar in context of CP.
-So Guys don't care about downvote believe in you.
|
|
|
|
|
The editor is trying to resolve what it thinks is html tags. If you go in and escape the pointy brackets in the message, it'll be fine.
I already did this in the OP of the cited question.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks John, After reading solution provided by Sandeep before, I got to know about.
Regards,
Hiren.
-"I don't know, I don't care, and it doesn't make any difference".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, both dealt with
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Under setting I noticed that Technical blogs was unchecked so I checked it. The result was that my reputation was reduced by 150 points. Three "Newsletter opt-in (undo)" appeared under my repitation history all at 20 Jan 2011 1:08 AM. I am sure that something is wrong here. I tried unchecking ot to see if that would reverse this odd process but it had no effect.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Same for me too. I did not even change my newsletter settings. I changed my screen ID, saved and bam! -50 points for newsletter opt-in undo.
|
|
|
|
|
Just curious as to what timezone is being used for the users recent reputation points list in their profile.
It appears to be UTC/GMT +1hour? i.e. I'm in GMT/UTC (UK) and an event at 8.54pm is listed as 9.54pm
Seems an odd one to use.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably a DST related bug.
|
|
|
|
|
I posted a tip/trick a couple of hours ago, and it still hasn't shown up on the CP front page.
Tips is here: Partial DateTime Object Equality[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
modified on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it fine - and I'm only Bronze author.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm at a loss. I just posted another one which I *do* see, but I still don't see the one I cited in the OP.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
"While working on a future article, I decided I need to be able to compare two DateTime objects based on any property I chose."
Your link takes me straight there. Marcus has voted you a five, and left a comment, and it appears in your profile list.
Maybe it just doesn't like you today!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
I found it by going to John's profile -> Tips & Tricks submission list to find it.
I was going to check if it was visible to me at all, which it was there, but I didn't look on the front page.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I can see the article itself too. But it's still not on the homepage.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, it shows up in the reputation stuff, and I can see it in my list of Tips, but it's *not* on the CP front page of recently submitted Tips.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
It's appearing for me now at the top of the list.
Did you have it in composiing status for a while, then made it available?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|