|
Luc Pattyn wrote: And yes too many replies are called "general" and awarded debator points there,
Yeah it should be included in Authority points.
|
|
|
|
|
How can clarifying a question be an Authority Point?
Answering it, yes, but to inform that an action has been taken is participation.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Only in technical forums DD. Also I have seen many answers/links in general message, that's why.
|
|
|
|
|
See Mr Maunder's response below.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, You win. So when we will get back our platinum participant?
|
|
|
|
|
When I awake, hopefully!
Off to bed.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Have Sweat dreams DD .
|
|
|
|
|
As I said, it is not a debate, it is an improvement nut not an answer.
So it cannot be Debator Points, and it cannot be Authority Points.
But the participation is still there.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
posting "please clarify" or "good answer" in a programming forum yields debator points (assuming message type "general").
posting "Elvis has died" or a CCC clue in the Lounge yields debator points.
|
|
|
|
|
What else could comments be? As Dave pointed out, a comment on an answer is not necessarily a contribution that adds to the answer, nor is it (always) a debate, a question, or (necessarily) organisation.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chris, that was what I was, very poorly, attempting to point out.
(I presume the recount will be complete by the time I crawl my carcass into work in about 5 hours time )
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately I second guessed myself after Luc's comment and restarted the rep recalc. It will be done in around 13 hrs. Sorry - I should have just the final bit continue on and it would have been finished soon.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The "comment" may or may not have technical merit. If it has (e.g. "I would have used an extension method here"), it would yield Authority in a forum; and if it hasn't (e.g. "I like the way you explained that"), it would yield Debator in a forum (even when no debate is taking place). I fail to see why that would be any different in Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm surprised how things changed so much. I gained in author which I suspect is the bookmarking. Lost in debator and participant so overall approximately 400 down in total.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, new author points and debator points for being bookmarked. Don't know about loosing debator/participant points though, I haven't lost any. I seem to have lost 80 authority points, for no apparent reason.
ADDED: what may have changed is this: I have noticed a lot of limits have been added to the FAQ, limiting almost every event to a specific number a day. If those limits now are effective, one could loose points.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I was on the homepage, and saw a new box thingy saying "Articles Awaiting Approval", so I clicked the doodad because Oooh shiney. I assumed due to the re-calc I'd gained enough points to do this so I read the article. I didn't think it was quite up to scratch yet, so I left a [hopefully] helpful message.
My problem now is that if he replies to me, I have lost the ability to Approve, so I can't reply. Can something be done about this, like letting him know or something. The best link I can give you is http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3726707/A-good-start.aspx[^] as I now can't get to the article.
My Jedi powers are weak, and getting weaker after the re-calc
|
|
|
|
|
I am able to approve articles and can't access that message.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I'll just wait and see I suppose.
I didn't have approve rights before the re-calc, but I have just tipped over into silver for under "Author" - is that enough?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - that's enough.
I've also made you a mentor. You deserve it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ah!
Now that you are back in the land of the living (although one could hardly call it that, I knew the universe was doomed when they invented the ear hair trimmer), I do have a Q
How long is the points update going to take?
Or, put another way, my participant points are way off.
(1000 for mvp, 3.5 years of sign ins, plus weekly 5 points for surveys come to more than I have already, plus there is all those other points I have earned, problems or not finished updating?
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Surveys are all there, sign-ins we only have for the last couple of years, but it turns out the comment participant points didn't get added in this last recalc. I'll run it again and get them added.
You may want to pop off for a beer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: You may want to pop off for a beer.
Hey, I don't need your permission for that Mister!
(ps, thanks for the permission, beer seeking as we speak!)
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, thanks I really didn't expect this!
|
|
|
|
|
Since this seems to be the most important question on CodeProject in 2011, I thought I would add my two penn'orth.
Looking at my reputation history (great feature by the way) I came across an entry where an answer of mine had been downvoted and I was accordingly docked two points. However I noticed that the answer had been accepted by the OP but I could not see any corresponding positive points in the history. So the question is/are (IMHO)
If someone downvotes an accepted answer, should I have points deducted?
If OP accepts my answer (regardless of its voter value) should I have points added?
I think we should be told.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen this too. I've one comment where the average is more than 3.5 (and therefore upvoted?) but I've got -2. The guidance says that the points are weighted by reputation, but I've no idea how it is actually calculated.
|
|
|
|