|
Ignore me.
In my testing for copying to clipboard for a project I had switched on "signed.applets.codebase_principal_support" in about:config - this was the cause of the dialog I was getting.
|
|
|
|
|
The devexpress banner (on the left, the small one under bob) seems to be malfunctioning.
When hovering it, the mouse changes to a hand but clicking doesn't do anything, also no url is shown at the bottom when hovering.
Also noticed it with the top banner once but can't seem to reproduce it there.
Noticed on Web19
Using Chrome
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for pointing this out, these ones slipped by me. The banners have been stopped and the client has been contacted.
|
|
|
|
|
My Rep Graph seems to show that I got some negative Participant Rep Points in the past, but according to the FAQ there is no way to receive those. What's going on here?
Also, less importantly, the text on the rep graph is slightly blurred with rainbowish colours, looks like ClearType (of a type that is not right for my monitor) that was hardcoded into the image.
|
|
|
|
|
You rep point for participant show 597 for me.
Also the line doesn't go down (for as far as I can see) so looks fine for me.
|
|
|
|
|
It goes down for me, between July 09 and October 09 it goes down about 9 times, 5 of those it went down by enough to colour the pixel under the line, the other 4 times it's a sub-pixel detail.
|
|
|
|
|
I think your just seeing the point that marks the exact time when something happened.
But you'll have to wait for Chris to verify that.
|
|
|
|
|
That could be.. but it looks very odd, it's very easy to imagine the line going down a bit at those places
|
|
|
|
|
I think that it's an optical illusion that you're experiencing. The line looks too tiny and the details are very minute for me to decide. 
Thiru just clarified yesterday that the participation reputation cannot go down, even if someone low-votes you.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
I copied the image into an image editor and zoomed it. There are a few spots where the alliased line below the main part becomes solid and alliasing is pushed into the second line below, but there's enough variation in thickness on the other more sloped lines that I think it's just a processing artifact of sorts.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Yep I think it is a rendering issue WRT aliasing as Dan pointed out. Fear not, your Participant reputation has not gone down, nor can it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok thanks
|
|
|
|
|
if still in doubt, you could just add some messages in this thread to compensate. 
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. [The QA section does it automatically now, I hope we soon get it on regular forums as well]
|
|
|
|
|
The filter sets itself to "C, C++, Windows" automatically. No matter how many times I clear it. If I clear it off and refresh the page, I see everything. But if I go to the second page by clicking next, the filter comes into place. This is a very irritating bug.
Using FF on Windows 7. I'll provide any more information if required.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's because the tags are in the query string. We're planning to make changes to how this tag filter remembers tags. Hopefully it will be resolved by then. It's in our TODO but not near the top 
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, I don't understand the motive behind creating threads about a woman that you don't ever know or have never met in person. This guy has been doing it for a while.
Also, EVERY SINGLE message the person started this thread[^] was some sort of abuse, and he's still up to it after a day. I'm not spending time on a troll.
What can you do about this?
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
I find the best response to someone like this is no response at all. Down-vote or 'vote to remove' if you wish but responding only gives him satisfaction and more often than not lead to abuse and insults.
Now the original post (can't read his reply's to you since they'v been removed) wasn't insulting or abusive, pointless and childish yes but that's not exactly a reason to attack him.
From the responses I could read I'm going to guess he started with the abuse and insults but that's still no reason to go down to his level and do it as well.
Best thing to do is to just ignore them.
Just my 2 cents
|
|
|
|
|
I only argued that he shouldn't have done what he did. I stopped talking to him when he responded with personal abuse. I could have gone to his level if I had to, but I didn't.
See my reply to Chris there.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] is where it started to go wrong unfortunately. Come on Rajesh, you're a better man than this, rise above it.
MVP 2010 - are they mad?
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if you had known what the thread was about? And do you know that he's already done the same thing in the past?! That pissed me off. I'm not sure if your reactions and opinions would be different if you had known the actual content and the topic of the thread.
Richard MacCutchan wrote: This[^] is where it started to go wrong unfortunately
And, did you know why did I say that? Unfortunately his reply to Nish was removed. Read my reply to aspdotnetdev there. I've mentioned the content.
But, I could have been polite in pointing out that his actions were being inappropriate. I failed at that, which I accept is my fault.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: I wonder if you had known what the thread was about?
Yes, I watched it all unfold, and stayed clear. The guy behaved somewhat improperly, but you have to expect some of that in the lounge. I have considerable sympathy for you on this but I don't think it's worth losing any sleep over.
MVP 2010 - are they mad?
|
|
|
|
|
As Richard pointed out the thread took a wrong turn at that point (can't see his response so don't know if yours was warranted or not, but I'm guessing it was).
I'm in no way accusing you or judging you, my answer was just a general one. I see to many people willing to respond to threads that really should just be ignored, eventually the poster will get the message (I hope) and stop posting drivel.
Anyway it's in the past and let's let it stay there 
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent, I'll take your points.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
When I edited this message from a few couple weeks ago, the text from the signature was placed at the bottom of the message Text (i.e., actually in the text box that the rest of the text is in for the main body of the message). And the only thing in the actual signature area (the little edit area below the main message text textbox) was the "this message was modified" message.
That was earlier today. I cancelled out of that edit and just tried it again right now. This time, the message text and signature merged just as before, but this time there was no "this message was modified" message in the signature (leaving the signature completely empty). I can provide screenshots if you like.
Note that I never completed any of those edits (I was only editing the message to get the text so I could use that text elsewhere).
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
