|
 Yup. It is the application which has to be resilent to user inputs.
Tip: Did you type in a Wordprocessor and paste this comment? The font seems to be standing separately (Verdana right?)
|
|
|
|
|
Nop, i used normal reply, with <\BIG> Tags 
No need to set it to Verdana the tag did all for me
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the BIG takes care of or the site stylesheet for BIG does the trick. It looks really pleasing and eye-friendly font. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
The good thing of CodeProject editor is that when you paste an hyperlink it automatically pastes a 'New Window' link. But this feature seems to work only in MSIE in entirety. For Mozilla FireFox (at least in its 2.0.0.4 version), first I have to paste the link (appears as normal text). Then select it and click link icon to hyperlink it.
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: For Mozilla FireFox (at least in its 2.0.0.4 version), first I have to paste the link (appears as normal text). Then select it and click link icon to hyperlink it.
I do the same
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
How does one place a link in an article such that when referencing another article, it does not return a page similar to http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/ProductActivation.asp[^]?
The issue stems from moving articles To and From [useritems] and specific areas such as [cpp].
10 articles linking to one another is unmanageable - it is similar to the Traveling Salesman problem (exponential in complexity). I regularly have this problem now.
If there is nothing in place, can we look at linking to "ProductActivation.asp" (rather than the entire URL) and get a silent redirect?
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Walton wrote: If there is nothing in place, can we look at linking to "ProductActivation.asp" (rather than the entire URL) and get a silent redirect?
This does not perform as expected (just the Base Article Name and ASP extension). It appears http://www.codeproject.com/useritems is automatically prepended...
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jeff,
Jeffrey Walton wrote: The issue stems from moving articles To and From [useritems] and specific areas such as [cpp].
I may be mistaken, but isn't this one of the things that the CP editors do when they move an article? And if an article has been moved, and you use the (old) useritems link, don't you get a page that says "Did you mean this article? ..."?
I agree that having it all automated would be nice, but in the galactic scheme of things, I would not rank this very high IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Hans,
Hans Dietrich wrote: "Did you mean this article? ..."?
Yes, but it is very unprofessional. It appears I did not care enough to provide proper links for the readers. Readers will beat me up, not the editors... Just my humble opinion.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: I may be mistaken, but isn't this one of the things that the CP editors do when they move an article?
Yes, editors are supposed to fix all links in the edited article, but they cannot really handle incoming links. Any article that was referring to the unedited article's URL will now be pointing to a non-existent URL. I think that's what Walton's talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I read it the other way. Checking caffeine level...yes, definitely low.
|
|
|
|
|
Some trackback utility should help right?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nishant,
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Any article that was referring to the unedited article's URL will now be pointing
Yep... (Sorry to reply so late).
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed that some bits of CP seem to be using a special "goto" page which seems to use a unique index for an article, perhaps if this was made more widely accessible then it would solve this. (I think it was when I clicked a link in one of the newsletters).
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm - good point. We probably need a PermaLink for articles. They don't get moved often (and soon, won't need to be moved at all) but it's a good idea just in case.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe Chris is trying to tell you something?
|
|
|
|
|
because it was created prior to the decision to focus so heavily on MS products, and it was decided to hide rather than delete it. 
--
You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
i see.
thanks
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
|
|
dan neely wrote: t was decided to hide rather than delete it
But it's funner having it as an Easter egg :->
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
The posts are also bit old right, giving an illusion as whether the forum is supported at all. In a way, does it make it look like a haunted house in a dilapitated condition?
|
|
|
|
|
It´s strange but true.
I´m trying to update some of my personal settings and after clicking the save button it shows me again the old settings.
|
|
|
|
|
Hit Ctrl+F5 to force a refresh of the page.
|
|
|
|
|
It was not solved with the refresh. The problem was (is) that the registration page does not give error messages on all fields.
After scanning and opdating some of the field all went OKAY.
Regards, André
|
|
|
|
|
Typical web browser page caching in effect. My Internet Explorer is always set to 'Check on every visit' though it is a little burden on my network pipe but I get freshest fresh content delivered on every request to my desktop.
But for some reasons, my Mozilla FireFox is truant. It overrides my settings always.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
