|
|
I thought ppolymorphe said, he would keep the time machine in secret...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It opens a blank page for me on Web03 and Web04. Why I went there? Too bored.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
It is gone. It had been largely abandoned for years and did not serve a purpose we were interested in supporting.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
CodeProject. A Guide. says:
Looking for icons, graphics, PocketPC themes, wallpaper or even a Javascript feed?
Time to remove the reference to PocketPC themes?
I did a search in this forum for "PocketPC" but it came up with nothing. Which leads me to wonder... is there some sort of inside joke where Maunder and co know about this but want to see how long it is before somebody brings it up?
Cheers,
विक्रम
"We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread
|
|
|
|
|
I see that Mr CP is not wearing the french flag for the French National Day.
If it is not a bug, it is a suggestion.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: lol which one? The flag you had until now or the "new" one from Patrouille de France?
I think the classical one is better, in fact it was a failed attempt to do a canadian flag
0x01AA wrote: My opinion is, because of this confusion CP decided not to Color Mr CP
What ? Do you mean Chris have a time machine and he knew it before it happen ?
In this case, is it possible to have the numbers of French Loto ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't take my comment above serious.
Regards, Bruno
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I keep the secret about the time machine.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Holy s*** please no! Don't try to paint the canadian flag with airplanes.
What I can recognize, they tried it with Motorcycles and it failed
Défilé 14 juillet 2018 Moto / Chute - YouTube[^]
S'il vous plaît excusez-moi encore. J'espère que la Croatie sera meilleure demain
[Edit]
Btw. I'm a fan of France, especally for Bébel and of course Louis de Funes
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Holy s*** please no! Don't try to paint the canadian flag with airplanes.
Do you prefer a red flag with a white cross ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
If I try to "compare" revisions that a poster of a QA question makes, I can't see any comparable stuff.
Didn't I used to have a side-by-side display on which I could easily pickoff a line visually to denote an alteration in an origiinal?
Or have I been using WinDiff too much and my experiences have begun to bleed into brain parts unknown?
[EDIT 180718]
Seriously? No attending ... selfsuture then.
[END EDIT 180718]
modified 18-Jul-18 13:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it used to show you too nice divs with the changes highlighted. The whole revision system has been broken for some time.
|
|
|
|
|
Any reason to have it twice in the left menu in personal profile (one after "my bookmarks" and one after "comments made")?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you should improve the time to answer the question. All the question should be answered whether it is yes or no. Your answer will be very helpful and time saving for the guys asking the questions.
|
|
|
|
|
The people answering questions on this site are volunteers.
Nobody is under any obligation to answer your questions at all, let alone within a fixed time.
If you don't get an answer to your question, then consider editing it to add more information, a better description of the problem, the relevant parts of your code, the details of the errors you're getting, etc.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
There is no staff here answering questions. Questions are answered by other users when they think it can be valuable. Answering is voluntary and none is getting paid.
If you got no answers to your questions, think about modifying them. Your two questions are very specific so that only users that have done similar can answer it. One is - at least for me - rather unclear.
Remember also that no one is getting paid here for answering and it is called "quick answers". So nobody will invest too much time to answer, rewrite your code, or write answers when they would become extensive.
|
|
|
|
|
One advice, read: What have you tried?[^]
Member 13411007 wrote: All the question should be answered whether it is yes or no Done. You are welcome
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you pls answer my keypoints question more in coding way, rather than just yes or no.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 13411007 wrote: I think you should improve the time to answer the question. All the question should be answered whether it is yes or no. That's exactly what I did...
Do you see our point now?
Better to wait for a correct answer, than forcing an answer that brings no value to the question.
Don't you think?
Now your questions are not in the list of unanswered anymore and that will difficult even more that you get the answer your were looking for.
Please re-read slowly the other answers to your message. I hope you now understand better what they say, since you are now living the practical use-case that they were explaining you.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 13411007 wrote: All the question should be answered whether it is yes or no.
Now, there's an idea.
Instead of only answering a question - and removing it from the "unanswered" queue - when we fully understand what the OP is trying to ask (and trust, me that can take a Looooooong time with some of 'em) we could have the system automatically post an answer at random from other questions using (say) 50% of the same words.
It probably wouldn't be of any use to the OP, and it would mean that nobody would know which questions are waiting for a solution, but it would get the question answered quickly, which appears to be your priority.
Most people would rather have a considered response from a volunteer who knows what they are doing instead ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You explained it, I did it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The job of a potential QA participant (both questioner and answerer) is to make himself clear about some development/programming/coding point. Unfortunately, nearly all posters become overly verbose to make his work so.
If counterpoints posted as ANSWERS were only COMMENTS the solution to problems would be arrived at faster. As soon as the original poster, upon seeing his question become a target for commenting and not ANSWERING, adds an [EDIT] ... [END EDIT] section to his post, he is acknowledging some sort of understanding. He doesn't need to further the "conversation" as such until he gets something to work then.
The thing is, there's a token system here where rewards are meeted out for good work. Obviously there's nothing to deter bad work. The nature of bad work is it's badness alone.
|
|
|
|
|