|
I've fixed it.
The trick (and yeah, it's a small trick) is that if you specify the language as C# but the code is clearly ASP.NET (eg starts with a page directive) then the colouriser ignores you and goes into ASP.NET mode.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it's just me, but the first page in the ASP .NET forum[^] looks weird. I am only seeing 7 posts even though I have "Per page = 50" and "Show = All". When I go to the next page in the forum, it looks normal with 50 posts showing.
I checked it in IE8 and Chrome on my XP SP3 as well as in IE10 on my WP8. Tried switching between Fixed and Fluid layout, pressing Ctrl-F5, but it keeps looking the same.
I checked all other forums, but this is the only one that behaves this way.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A long time ago, I saw an icon legend on CP for the message boards, but cannot find it now.
Does it exist?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean the legend right at the bottom of the forums?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No I mean the legend that tells what the various user icons mean that are next to the user name in a post.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you go to the profile of someone who has a special icon and click on one of those icons, it will take you to this page[^].
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
"Discussions posted for the Published version of this article."
English is not my first language so I may be mistaken here.
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
The author may have unpublished versions of the article. That is all it is talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
My mobile's mail client (I know it's a bit old but...) cannot decipher HTML messages and is only limited to text-only. So, while trying to see any mail from CP, it appears as an HTML attachment. Making me unable to read the content without downloading it and opening it in my browser.
So, I request for including an alternate text-only view with hyperlinks in mails from CP.
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Source
|
|
|
|
|
Go to your profile[^] and under Email Format choose "Text"
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That sets the format for all the emails. They will only come with text. But what I'm asking is to contain both the text and html bodies in one mail by utilizing alternate mime views. Something like this[^]
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Source
|
|
|
|
|
We were originally going to do this but it means that every email is roughly twice as big, and that means twice the bandwidth. And that's expensive.
Supporting text-only email is, unfortunately, like supporting IE7. We do it, we want to do it, but we have to be practical about the decisions we make for 1% of the population and how they affect the other 99%.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm... Bandwidth hurts. Fine. I'm getting a new cell next month 
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Source
|
|
|
|
|
Hi folks,
I went to review this[^] blog entry, and wanted to write a message to the author describing the formatting issue, but the discussion area didn't exist. In the past, it has always been available for unpublished articles, but this time it just said "Comments are only available once an article is submitted for publishing." I'm not sure what state it's in, but it appeared under "Blogs needing approval" on the home page.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Clement wrote: discussion area didn't exist
I just went there and it exists for me.... Might be a privileges thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I have found that as well, but only for Technical Blog submissions. The Comments are not available in the moderation queue for the first revision, but once the blog is published, it appears. I don't know if it is a technical issue, but it is always like that.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
If you go to the bottom of the blog now you should now see the comment button. However, if a blog is still in the review state then you cannot add comments to it. I think this is down to the fact that blogs come in via an RSS feed so there is some difficulty in posting messages back to the author while they are in this state.
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
I was wondering if I can make a codeproject chrome app for codeproject and publish it to my account, not there to make money or anything, just their for everyone, its just just a simple chrome app that when you press it it will take you to http://www.codeproject.com/[^]
all I would need to do this, is chrome will game me a file for code project to upload and push, or they put some sort of meta thing in their header, I did the same with with my site www.techxsoftware.weebly.com
|
|
|
|
|
I'd suggest that you could always make an article out of this. I, for one, would love to see some articles on Chrome development (we only have a couple at the moment).
|
|
|
|
|
so may I make this chrpome app for the site? it would proply help the sponsor ship of the site and proply get more users for it, mostly because it will be in the chrome webstore
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see why not. As long as you don't try to pass it off as an official CodeProject app, you should be okay.
|
|
|
|
|
I wont pass it off as a an offical code project app, but thats good to know I can proseed with this, thanks,
I am ready to publish it, all codeproject needs to do is add this tag to the header of the site and publish
<meta name="google-site-verification" content="7_M3GmfeNFl5Gt08OP4flDQZfGadooSQSkzWDMt1Tms" />
or
upload this file which is a confermination from google so then the app can be published
http://www.codeproject.com/google1a610753f581bd4c.html[^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
