|
Shog9 wrote: there was a C++ / MFC FAQ in the form of an article, written and maintained by Mike Dunn
I remember seeing that. It was very helpful when I did C++ stuff 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
If someone repeats a question that's answered in that forum's FAQ, it can be handled with a link to the answer(s) in the FAQ. Even that would save time over someone typing a custom answer to a stock question.
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Balkany wrote: If someone repeats a question that's answered in that forum's FAQ, it can be handled with a link to the answer(s) in the FAQ
I agree, I did consider putting my collection of standard answers in my blog, but never
actually came around doing that.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not saying it would be immediately be abused, but...
Q: Who is always right?
A: The Developer.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
Add a [Bump] link to the message voting form on thread heads.
Three bumps moves the thread up by one (appears nearer to the top of the forum). Three more bumps moves it up again. And so on.
20 bumps moves it to a "best of" list for the forum.
50 bumps automatically submits it to Digg and adds a [Digg this] link to it.
100 bumps creates a fake name and Facebook page for it, populating the event list with random musings composed from the replies using a Markov text generator.
200 bumps creates a separate forum for the thread and moves it there.
500 bumps and CP sponsors a ticker-tape parade in its honor.
1000 bumps and the thread will be printed out, burned, and its ashes shot into orbit.
Thoughts?
Citizen 20.1.01 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
|
|
|
|
|
Aren't bumps reserved for birthdays? 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
Something didn't digest well today? 
|
|
|
|
|
It seems as though their are many forums that are missing from the forum search. A few forums that don't catch my eye in the list are: Coding Horrors, Soapbox, Lounge, and a few others. Although these forums are not necessarily used for programming issues sometimes I find that I still need to do a quick search in these forums for posts that caught my eye before.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my homepage Oracle Studios
Discounted or Free Software for Students:
DreamSpark - downloads.channel8.msdn.com
MSDN Academic Alliance - www.msdnaa.com
|
|
|
|
|
You can search these from within the forum page itself. They aren't included in the forum search page itself because they aren't Q&A forums
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When I posted my article I got an improvement feedback in this message[^]. I asked how to do it long time ago (after getting that suggestion) and follow the instructions I was said: I retrieved the HTML of the article, modified it and sent it back. But the change has been never shown. It is not urgent and not so important, but if it could be changed...
Thanks anyways.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
“The First Rule of Program Optimization: Don't do it. The Second Rule of Program Optimization (for experts only!): Don't do it yet.” - Michael A. Jackson
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
When did you send back the changes? Updates should be done within 1-2 business days.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
mmmm, about one year ago... I guess it was missread or lost between something with more priority and got outdated.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
“The First Rule of Program Optimization: Don't do it. The Second Rule of Program Optimization (for experts only!): Don't do it yet.” - Michael A. Jackson
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
But as I say, it is not so important, the people that may use the article can read the improvement in the article's FAQ and modify it by themselves once code downloaded.
Or I can send the update another time if you want.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
“The First Rule of Program Optimization: Don't do it. The Second Rule of Program Optimization (for experts only!): Don't do it yet.” - Michael A. Jackson
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Re-Sent. If you want you can delete this thread. Sorry for disturbing.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
“The First Rule of Program Optimization: Don't do it. The Second Rule of Program Optimization (for experts only!): Don't do it yet.” - Michael A. Jackson
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I posted an article.... which I wanted to edit later on.... actually I tried to post a complete version before but by that time the session expired.... I tried to recollect it but it did'nt......
I jotted down the ideas and placed a summary so that I can edit it later on... but by the time I come back.... due to bad comments it was deleted hahaha....
I'm trying to say 3 points here:
1. If I can save my article for publishing later on instead of immediately publish.
2. If I get the html back if my article is deleted.
3. If an article can remain as anonymous contribution for the time even if someone is not logged in, so that one can claim it later.
Amit Kumar Thakur
|
|
|
|
|
Nice point.
But one way to do it is to download the article template and work locally on the computer. Then going to the assistant, paste your article and make the preview, if all is ok... submit. If not... continue working/editing locally.
Then you will have the first 2 points solved.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
“The First Rule of Program Optimization: Don't do it. The Second Rule of Program Optimization (for experts only!): Don't do it yet.” - Michael A. Jackson
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
As for points 1 and 2, you can edit it locally like Nelek suggested. I believe point 1 is already on the site wishlist. I always edit locally myself, to avoid losing my work in case there is problem with server.
As for point 3, this is a bad idea, and would probably lead to more crap articles, since the author is anonymous.
|
|
|
|
|
this can be a scrap idea to have anonymous logon.... if all the articles are not passing through moderator's approval.... what do u say....
Well.... I had pain so I shouted.... otherwise notepad was enough to do programming.... what was the use of VS.... it is small thing and actually achievable also, is'nt it....
Amit Kumar Thakur
|
|
|
|
|
one word: "WHAT?"
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my homepage Oracle Studios
Discounted or Free Software for Students:
DreamSpark - downloads.channel8.msdn.com
MSDN Academic Alliance - www.msdnaa.com
|
|
|
|
|
Well I think it has not to be 100% anonimous... Just save the name of publisher internally for CP control as always but not showing it on the article as long is not approved.
I think it could be a bit helpfull for some begginer article posters that can get the feedback without being ashamed on the feedback itself. I mean, first article post, lots of bad comments (but well justified) about the article and the autor can be "marked" as "bad/crappy/..." coder or something like that and be placed in "not read anymore" list of other users, so it affects him in future aproaches or different articles. Everyone can have a bad day/idea and not showing (but being known) the autor's name could be helpfull for some that cases.
Trolling and crappy articles will anyways come further, but if you can help some of genuin (but bad executed) tries... I don't find it bad
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
“The First Rule of Program Optimization: Don't do it. The Second Rule of Program Optimization (for experts only!): Don't do it yet.” - Michael A. Jackson
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you have good idea here: to submit article for comments, not for publication. There would be no voting, just comments, so author can improve article, and see if article is good or bad idea, and then fix article and submit for publication.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: I think you have good idea here: to submit article for comments, not for publication.
I would love to see this implemented. Sort of like a Beta release for articles submitted for peer review.
I have several articles I am working on and once in awhile, I would like to solicit advice or ask for a point of clarification. And, I wouldn't mind putting together a few "experimental" articles for the purpose of peer review. If the idea didn't work out, I could refine it or scrap the idea all together.
When finally submitted for publication, the article would start with a clean slate with all the previous comments wiped.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree.
Chris, what do you think? - a "peer review" article submittal, no voting, just comments, and the peer review comments are dropped when article is submitted for publication.
|
|
|
|
|
I second that.
I would like to add a (possibly selectable) deadline though, so after that they either get published or discarded.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: submit article for comments, not for publication. There would be no voting, just comments, so author can improve article, and see if article is good or bad idea, and then fix article and submit for publication.
I like that idea. It could to an extent clear out some of the junk articles floating around.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
