|
This has been fixed our end and we'll upload the fix in the next couple of days. Thanks for reporting it!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In my recent article "Monitoring and Controlling a Recursing Function in a Worker Thread" I had problems with the following line of code
curFolders->Add(* inString + "\\" + FindFileData.cFileName);
it seemed to cause formatting problems for a large part of the rest of the article starting with the "\\". In the end I substituted the slashes with ampersand # codes. This didn't work. It shows the ampersand codes instead of the slashes but at least it didn't corrupt the subsequent formatting so I have left it.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ben
|
|
|
|
|
When you click the save button on your Shiny New account it takes you to the top of the same page you are on and gives you a small line of green text telling you your account has been added! I call this a bug because the only time I ever go back to that window is when there has been an error in the form somewhere take me to a new page pulease!
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed in my profile that the Message Posted value haven't incremented in the last weeks, but I have answered several questions in my article's forums. Am I missing something?
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, just noticed the message posted count have incremented by one. So, the count is just for messages originally posted by me? answers/replies don't increment the count, right?
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
Any messages that you post on any of the forums (including the Lounge and other people's blogs) count towards your message count. If this isn't the case, it must be a bug.
Regards,
--Perspx
"The Blue Screen of Death, also known as The Blue Screen of Doom, the "Blue Screen of Fun", "Phatul Exception: The WRECKening" and "Windows Vista", is a multi award-winning game first developed in 1995 by Microsoft" - Uncyclopedia
Introduction to Object-Oriented JavaScript
|
|
|
|
|
I will test for a while and tell again...
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
Appears to be it is working, but I will pay attention for the next posts.
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
Why is there a single forum for WPF, WCF, and WF. They have nothing in common, and it's pretty difficult to find WCF stuff in that forum.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: They have nothing in common
Except that they were all introduced in the .NET 3.5 release.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought they were all introduced in .NET 3.0 and then just improved upon with .NET 3.5. LINQ is one of the features of .NET 3.5 which was not in .NET 3.0.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my Blog
|
|
|
|
|
First, you're wrong - they were introduced in .Net 3.0.
Second, that should have absolutely nothing to do with grouping them together. WPF is about as far from WCF as two things can possibly be.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
God you can be sanctimonious sometimes.
You're right they were introduced in 3 not 3.5, but the point was still valid. It was my opinion that the reason they were grouped in one forum is that they were a feature of one of the .NET releases. I agree that they shouldn't be.
|
|
|
|
|
J4amieC wrote: God you can be sanctimonious sometimes.
I prefer the term "precise", or even "pedantic".
J4amieC wrote: It was my opinion that the reason they were grouped in one forum is that they were a feature of one of the .NET releases. I agree that they shouldn't be.
Quote Selected Text
But your argument was stated in such a way as to not convey agreement with my original supposition.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: or even "pedantic"
Ok, im happy to go with that one 
|
|
|
|
|
Splitting them up would be a good thing. You're right that they have nothing to do with each other. Along similar lines, the "LINQ and .NET 3.5" forum should probably be split as well or at least renamed to just LINQ.
Scott Dorman Microsoft® MVP - Visual C# | MCPD
President - Tampa Bay IASA
[ Blog][ Articles][ Forum Guidelines]
Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Why is there a single forum for WPF, WCF, and WF. They have nothing in common, and it's pretty difficult to find WCF stuff in that forum.
I think when those technologies came out, there wasn't enough interest in them to warrant 3 forums. If that has changed now maybe you could coax Chris into splitting them into separate forums 
Though I still don't see why anyone would use WF for anything
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Though I still don't see why anyone would use WF for anything
To make something that should be simple insanely complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
That sounds an awful lot like WPF and WCF as well.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to disagree, but well no. Considering it took me about a year to get my head around WPF, I can't disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Why is there a single forum for WPF, WCF, and WF. They have nothing in common
Sure they have. There's the W, and the F, and they, errrm, use XML.
I suspect that a WF forum will have low traffic because the vast majority of the questions seem to be about WPF, with a minority being about WCF.
|
|
|
|
|
- add a button on the author's article list page next to an unlisted article that will "list" it
- color the heading of unlisted articles something different, e.g., poofy pink, so the author will realize it's unlisted
|
|
|
|
|
The "This is an unfinished article" isn't enough.
(I'm just not sure I want poofy pink on the site...)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The "This is an unfinished article" isn't enough.
That's on the article list, not on the article itself. When you're looking at an article, there's no indication that it's unlisted. A different color header would be in keeping with the other colored headers - and besides, the public would never see the poofy pink. Whatever color, I think it should be different - maybe a poofy green?
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhhh....
Gotcha.
But we're not having poofy anything.
It'll be manly red or something. Rare T-bone steak red.
[Both suggestions on the TODO]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
