|
Au contraire. It always works. However it seldom gives you what you hope for. That's not its fault though.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
See this link:
http://www.codeproject.com/Answers/82933/bind-data-to-data-grid-combobox.aspx?cmt=1025#cmt2_82933[^]
It state's that there is 1 answer but none are displayed (in reality there really is a answer)
How to reproduce:
Go to my profile's comments posted[^]
Then click on the last comment (first in the row) view link.
What happened:
The OP posted a answer commenting on the answer given.
I pointed out that the OP should use the comment feature for that.
When going back to the question it seems he did so and deleted his answer therefor deleting my comment. So when I go to the answer in the way described I guess a error happens and for some reason only the question and none of the answers get displayed.
|
|
|
|
|
For me, it says there are 2 answers, and I see two answers.
Do you have anything set in your filter (top right)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Nope nothing set in the filter.
Now it does say 2 answers (I guess someone added a answer since I posted here) but I still don't see them.
Chrome 4.1
[EDIT]I get it on web21 / web24 (haven't landed on any others after countless refreshes) and the good old magic ctrl+F5 doesn't work  [/EDIT]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the detailed report Tom. We'll get this fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
This has probably been asked before but it has occurred to me that in addition to the abilities to 'Improve' questions and answers and Delete them, might it not be reasonable to also allow 'Mark as Answered'.
I have encountered situations in the past where this would have been appropriate and have just seen a prime example.
An answer was posted to a question, through which (together with several comments) the OP was able to resolve their problem. The OP even commented that he had resolved the problem, due to the answer, and was advised that all the thanks required would be to mark it as answered. The OP then proceeded to vote it 4 and not mark as answered.
People still post answers to 'Answered' questions anyway, so I do not see that allowing this would do any harm.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Why do programmers often confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
|
|
|
|
|
The exampel raised by Henry was mine, and I would have liked to see it marked as answered... 
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Added to the TODO list
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers! ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Why do programmers often confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really agree that this should be added. I think it should be completely up to the original poster whether or not an answer is marked as accepted (and if it *is* marked as accepted, it should automatically be voted a 5).
I also think that only one response to a question should be marked as the accepted.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure we need/want the accepted stuff.
If it's there, yes, it is in hands of the OP and nobody else.
IMO more than one answer can be accepted; answers can complement each other, or offer alternatives.
The OP can ask what he wants, different people can answer whatever they like, but the OP would only be allowed to accept one answer? I fail to see the logic in that. Programming isn't math, there sometimes are several perfectly good answers, and the OP may well be capable of recognizing that.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Programming isn't math
Even in Mathematics, a problem can be solved in n different ways.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Small detail: If I make a comment to my own answer, then I am sent an email notification.
Isn't it possible to check if the answer poster is the same person as the one commenting so you can avoid sending emails to yourself?
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: avoid sending emails to yourself?
How else am I to feel wanted?
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Why do programmers often confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: Get a dog...
I daren't do that. The neighbours already complain about me barking all night!
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Why do programmers often confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed that quite often (especially with new questions in QA), two people will answer the question at precisely the same time, with basically the same answer.
While it's not a disadvantage for the OP to receive the same answer twice, it seems like a waste of time for one of the two people submitting the answer.
What do the rest of you think? Do you agree or do you think it's unimportant/irrelevant?
|
|
|
|
|
Irrelevent.
Just means that great minds think alike, each gives confidence to the OP that they are right, and having things worded slightly differently may help further the understanding.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: Just means that great minds think alike, each gives confidence to the OP that they are right, and having things worded slightly differently may help further the understanding.
That I agree with you about, but I might not want to spend my time composing a lengthy answer if I knew that somebody else was doing the same...
|
|
|
|
|
Then attend Jedi School and learn Mind Reading!
I can see no other way around it!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, the force is strong in this one...
We're programmers, right? There's always a way!
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: I can see no other way around it!
Really? How about "allocating a question", giving you sole answer rights (for a limited amount of time), so nobody else can start typing an answer. Probably opens up a new box of cans of worms...
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: How about "allocating a question", giving you sole answer rights
Something like this did exist in the early days, when it would show a message like "Locked by MrX, lock expires in 10 minutes", or similar wording. I suspect it caused some troubles and was thus removed.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, massive queues must have been forming with millions of members waiting in line for an opportunity to provide an answer. It would be a reverse denial-of-service defense situation, wouldn't it?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
It still exists for edit's, I never knew it exited for answering tho
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
