|
When adding an input text to the polls, make the text auto-fill based upon previously inputted data.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting suggestion - thanks
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
On the home page, the article text "Reusable multithreaded TCP client and server classes with example project in VB.NET" does not wrap within the articles section's border.
Windows XP Pro SP3
Google Chrome v20.0.1132.57 m
Screen Resolution 1024x768
DELL Laptop
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, same here, Win7 Pro 64, Google Chrome 20.0.1132, Res 1600x900 Acer.
Same thing happens with the "ToDoList 6.5.2 Feature Release - An ..." thread.
FF12 is ok, IE9/8 are ok, Safari 5.1 is not (at least WebKit is consistent, even in its failures).
EDIT: word-wrap:normal; seems to do the job
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater.
Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater.
Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Windows XP Pro SP3
Wow, really?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. It's old and slow. I've been meaning to upgrade, but other expenses keep popping up. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, just get a new laptop/desktop and you'll get a free OS upgrade with it. (not really free of course, but you know what I mean)
|
|
|
|
|
My cousin built his and has offered to help me build one. I just need to save some $$$ because I want a really pimped up desktop. 
|
|
|
|
|
Does it fail to wrap on page load only? ie if you expand and then contract the window does the wrapping correct itself? I'm seeing a rendering bug in Chrome that occurs on page load.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Some recent change you guys did has introduced a few rendering problems in the forums too. On occasions if you resize the browser window, the forum gets completely messy and then if you resize it to back to its original size, it is still messy (although a little more readable). Happens with IE 9.
|
|
|
|
|
We haven't touched the forums in a while.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I'll take a screenshot the next time I get the error.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Resize rewraps it. I guess it's an OnLoad command problem.
|
|
|
|
|
The email you get when someone answer's a Quick Question reads:
"A answer has been posted to your question about..."
|
|
|
|
|
It's taken more than a year for someone to spot it.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
The spam filter has locked him out for one innocent post.
|
|
|
|
|
Done.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that the spam filter forcing a spam-vote on my post also resulted in my account being de-activated.
Hi Nish Sivakumar,
Your account at The Code Project has been reported as "The member is a spammer" 1 time
and is now deactivated.
The Code Project
http://www.codeproject.com
Thanks, that is nice! 
|
|
|
|
|
I posted this to Chris L below, but posting this here again since it's relevant to this thread:
I've linked to my CodeProject profile page in multipe places as a single point link to all my CP articles. Now anyone clicking that profile link will just see a message saying that my account is deactivated. I think this is quite extreme. The post that caused all this contained a regular news-article link, and I can't imagine why that one link would result in such an extreme action.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - the spam filter was accidentally re-enabled in an update so I've nuked it properly. I've emailed the authors of the spam filter and they have suggestions on how to improve the accuracy, but frankly I just aren't seeing the benefit of an automated system after all of this. Great idea, way too risky.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Great idea, way too risky.
You could add a check to exclude people who've been members here for say 3+ years and haven't really shown signs of being spammers.
|
|
|
|
|
We still get spam from old accounts. Not often, true, but it happens.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We still get spam from old accounts. Not often, true, but it happens.
Well, then couldn't you just add more checks? Member for 2 years. Posted 3 articles that are rated 3.5 or higher. Rep score is 10,000 or more. Surely, you can identify people who have very very little chance of spamming here.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
