difference between asp.net 3.5 and mvc 4

Question

1.00/5 (1 vote)

See more:

MVC

what is difference between asp.net 3.5 and mvc 4?
And why used MVC?

Posted 27-May-15 2:58am

Member 11550526

Updated 27-May-15 3:56am

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov

v3

Add a Solution

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Maciej Los · Answer 1 · 2015-05-27T03:31:00

Solution 1

There's no difference! MVC is a part of ASP.NET. Please, see: ASP.NET MVC Overview[^]

Posted 27-May-15 3:31am

Maciej Los

Comments

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 27-May-15 9:55am

My 4 this time.

The question is total absurd, of course.

But your explanation could be a bit more accurate. First and foremost, is MVC a part of ASP.NET? Yes and no? It is "packaged" with it, but I would rather consider MVC as a framework on top of ASP.NET platform.

"No difference" can be understood only figuratively, so it could confuse something (especially the inquirer who was so naive to ask such a question), because this expression is usually understood as "two things are absolutely identical", which is wrong. You could have said that the concept of "difference" cannot be applied to this case at all (the whole and the part, two things working together, and so on). In fact, the concept of "difference" rarely makes any certain sense, this is more of a figure of speech, not a strict concept.

—SA

Maciej Los 27-May-15 10:10am

Thank you, Sergey for your valuable comment. I was bit lazy in explanation ;)