Click here to Skip to main content
15,886,799 members
Articles / All Topics
Technical Blog

3 Reasons Why I Love NDepend’s Dashboard

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
5.00/5 (2 votes)
5 Oct 2013CPOL3 min read 6.5K   3  
3 reasons why I love NDepend's dashboard

Disclaimer: Sometime back, I received a free licence for NDepend from Patrick Smacchia. Patrick contacted me for reviewing the latest version and did not express any expectation for a positive review.

According to NDepend’s website:

NDepend offers a wide range of features to let the user analyze a code base. It is often described as a Swiss Army Knife for .NET developers.

After spending a couple of hours with the NDepend as a new user, the statement seems to be quite relevant. For last few months, I have been part of a complex business application built by developers with different field of expertise, i.e., SharePoint, C#, Linq to SQL to name a few. As a lead developer and architect, time and again I have felt the need of correct set of tools which can help me to understand and check the implementation if it follows the design and architecture envisioned. Lately, I have been using Visual Studio Ultimate for this purpose. With a whopping price tag of $13,299.00 (which is really difficult to convince your Manager to buy it for you), it does help you in some areas for e.g. creating dependency graphs, finding code clones, etc. But, you still miss detailed metric which you can directly see and give your developers as a feedback.

Having said that, NDepend has been quite on mark as far as that need is concerned.

  • I used one of the Business Layer assemblies of a medium complexity project to analyse the NDepend’s dashboard. The result was phenomenal, resulting in various categories. For e.g. it clearly states the number of line of code (LoC) in my assembly and also out of which are not my code. The not my code basically excludes the code generated by Visual Studio or any other frameworks and usually in designer files. This is quite transparent information not only for the development team but also the stakeholders, client involved in the software.

    dashboard

  • The dashboard as the name suggests is in fact one place for all the information I need on a day to day basis. It simply tells me how many types, assemblies, namespaces, methods, etc. have been used in the project. Is there an external or third party assembly being used? This is something you want to know without actually opening the Visual Studio project. Or I just know from the dashboard if there are any code rules which have been violated in the project.
  • Then you have queries and rules explorer. The left panel as shown in the image below basically tells you which rule sets have been violated or followed by assembly. The icons are quite standard and it’s quite clear what they mean. For example, in the Architecture and Layering category, I can see there is one namespace with a dependency cycle or there are 10 instances where UI layer is actually calling the DAL layer. Now if I select and click on the left panel, NDepend would provide the detailed information pointing out the places where the rule has been violated.

    queries

Of course, there are some places where I do not agree with NDepend as well. For e.g. the naming conventions. Every company or team has a different set of naming standards and they are decided on various factors. However, the good news is that I can turn off a group or a ruleset if I am not interested.

naming_conventions

All in all, the first impression has been very positive. Let’s see if NDepend can be the tool which becomes part of artillery (they claim to be Swiss Knife for developers :) ), as ReSharper did some time back.

€ 299 for every developer edition is a good investment for a tool which helps you to analyse the quality of your code and product. At the same time, it’s a great learning tool. Eventually, the developers will stick to design principles and best practices resulting in a better product.

The post 3 reasons why I love NDepend’s dashboard appeared first on Manas Bhardwaj's Stream.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


Written By
Architect
Netherlands Netherlands

Read my personal blog at www.manasbhardwaj.net.


Comments and Discussions

 
-- There are no messages in this forum --