|
Hours at work per day actually working in front of a screen: 5-6
Hours at work per week: 48-50 (usually includes at least two Saturdays a month)
Last night was an exception...up at 11:30 and work until 3:30 doing a bi-annual azure database archive/rebuild process. Up at 8:00 again for another client's special budget request that they need yesterday. (due tomorrow!) 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
About 14 hours a day, but not weekends - it is 0 at weekend...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
The real question is : How many hours per day you are looking at that black mirror ( computer, phone, tv, tablet, advertising billboards etc.etc. ) ?
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
5/6 per day, not in weekends.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
For me, it depends on the how nicely the week was scheduled because I know wich is following step for everything, in that case, my working/focused raise to the top, otherwise, I would say, maybe one hour per day and as all we know, the nice scheduling is like a chimera...
|
|
|
|
|
averaging 60-65 hours for work,maybe another 20 off work hours, and lately 4-6 hours each weekend day (mostly work).
salary and deadlines suck.
|
|
|
|
|
45 to 50 hours per week at the job, nothing job-related on weekends. Just personal stuff (non-coding) at home.
|
|
|
|
|
Other than a week of enforced abstinence during a cross country move 5 years ago, I have spent at least ten hours a day, seven days a week at the computer for the last 24'ish years, somewhat less for the ten years before that.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
I work a 35-hour week in front of 3 screens and when at home, I'm back at my two screens playing or on my big TV screen with my GF watching stuff or playing (Diablo 3/Mario Kart). Hm, saying that makes me wonder WTF I don't need glasses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice work
I do all my own stunts, but never intentionally!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
ta! 
|
|
|
|
|
Very good. Now you are worthy of the honor to write a new slicer for my 3D printer.
I have been editing the 3D model[^] for almost two weeks now, but both Blender and Cura have a hard time with it and could both use some of your cheat code when intersecting parts.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Hahah, I am finally worthy!   
|
|
|
|
|
Took you long enough 
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Where is my dice parser?!  
modified 30-May-19 11:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
That looks very much licke a lander from Space 1999?
Who the f*** is General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it's a very good 22 inch model of the original 44 inch studio model[^]. I got it at a website for 3D printing. So why not scale it at 200% and print it at the size of the original model?
The problem is that the 3D model appears to have been intended for rendering and not for 3D printing. Especially because of the size I have to cut apart the model in more managable chunks, replace details that were intended for texturing by printable 3D objects and even redesign some parts that are 'not round enough'.
Both editing and printing involve a lot of intersecting 3D objects with planes and recalculating the objects accordingly. In most cases that's just some math, but sometimes two polygons intersect in a very awkward way and it's hard to come up with an algorithm that handles these cases reliably. So I can feel the OP's pain and it's great that he found a 'good enough' type of solution to his problem.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Now what happens when you release the eraser and start it again, and repeat a few times so that the subsequent erases are working on multiple independent islands? Or did you do that in the example, but there isn't a way to indicate it?
Regardless of the answer, Congrats! Most impressive!
|
|
|
|
|
every single mouse move / frame in that gif is such an operation from scratch.... i.e. after each erase, I update my whole object model, possibly splitting shape into shapes. Then do it again on next erase / mouse move.
so yeah, I did it! 
there is also quad tree to save some un-needed computation!
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: there is also quad tree to save some un-needed computation!
Well done. Now it will be trivial(*) to expand it into an octree and turn the whole thing into a 3D eraser.
(*) Don't believe that. I'm just being evil.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
modified 31-May-19 9:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
It's true!
Initially I though this structure was complicated. I kept reading about it and being mystified. But finally I understood... and WTF, this is, in fact, a trivial idea! How could they described it in such opaque terms?! 
In fact, for a while I had I generalised, multi dimensional version of it, but I deleted that code since. It was pointless and complicating thing for no benefit...
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I mean I had an octree structure.
Manipulating 3D shape and cutting them with a 3D eraser.. errmm.. not there yet!
No plan either!  
โ๐ฆโคโกโ
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
My company decided they would move to a new site. The new site required some 'modification' to make it suitable. They are a company that specialises in infrastructure. Some of the site is not ready. The management treat this a 'few' teething troubles, I mean it can't be there first rodeo, So on Monday I have to attend an 'induction to the new office & site' in a place with holes in the walls...
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: on Monday I have to attend an 'induction to the new office & site' in a place with holes in the walls...
Here in civilized Wales, we fill 'em with glass and call 'em "Windows".
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
