|
Pretty much.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Be glad it's Friday 
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, worked once I closed and opened a new browser tab.
|
|
|
|
|
On the plus side, that was the only 4 hour stretch of no spam that I can remember 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I need a drink.
Funnily enough that is exactly what I did during the down time.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif) , ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) , or yes?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meet me at the bar; I'm buying. 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello All,
I started writing code in the late 90s using VB4. In 2000 I took VB6, SQL Server and a pretty good skill set to a previously DOS and flat file only company as their first Windows Programmer. What happened from there was both classic and stupid. I got comfortable and felt safe. We pumped out a lot of programs fast and dirty and updated, upgraded and converted a lot of customers. I was mostly a 1 man programming department trying to keep up with competitors who had full staffs. I quit developing new stuff, except for a few new features a year, and mostly did maintenance. As a company we kept putting of the "rewrite to new tech" in order to modify our existing software to work for that newest customer. It really became a cycle where I fell farther and farther behind the leading edge of our industry while I tried to keep the existing product modern enough to keep management and sales happy. In 2014 I took a big gamble and forced a stop to the cycle while I tried to catch up with tech and start development of a core product line that had a future. It cost me my job.
Sorry for the book, but I wanted to tell everyone that so you understand that, when I ask you this:
I am an application programmer at heart, and while I am behind the current tech, I am very good at what I do. I just can't seem to find the right resource or approach to finding my way back to the front of our field. There seems to be no clear starting point in the current jumble of interwoven platforms, libraries, methodologies, languages and what not. I tried moving to VB.NET and the first code review I asked for I was told that I was writing very good VB6 code in VB.NET. They were right, that was what it was.
I think I want to move to C#, if for no other reason than to help break old habits. Can someone point me in the right direction? How do I get moving again?
Thanks.
Rem
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good books are always useful, this Useful Reference Books[^] link lists several. You can also download VS express 2015 Community Edition to start.
[edit]
thanks to Cornelius Henning.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
modified 11-Mar-16 16:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: You can also download an express version of VS to start
The express versions are dead. It's now VS 2015 Community Edition. It has all the features of the full version, and is free.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
 Oops, thanks, will edit my post.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to stick with Microsoft, let me make these suggestions to look into:
For Normal Windows App Dev: C# and the Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF)
For Windows Store/Mobile/Cortana App Dev: C# and Windows Universal
For Web App Dev: C# and MVC/ASP.Net
The Windows Universal App platform is still pretty new so the developer base reamains relatively small. It also seems to picking up a growing number of detractors in the development community.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't mind spending a little money, get a sub to Pluralsight. They have huge quantities of high-quality C# and .net training. You could even just sign up for one month ($30) and drink from the firehose for 10 hours a day if you're of a mind to.
|
|
|
|
|
Plus 1 for Pluralsight. Best technical training out there.
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Well, from what you wrote, why not start with the more esoteric stuff in C# - lambda expressions, LINQ, reflection, domains, anonymous methods, runtime code generation, IL, C# 6.0 features, etc.
That way, if you learn the advanced stuff first, your C# code won't look like VB6 code  Then again, your code might not look like average C# either, but I'm guessing you're already pretty comfortable with the boring stuff. 
Some good stuff (and boring stuff) here: http://csharp.2000things.com/
(Had to wait to post this for CP issue to be resolved, haha)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Foothill and Marc are both right. Go directly to c# the learning curve is fairly mild and it should break you of the old habits (it did for me).
I would first make a decision as to where you want to work, desktop LOB, web or hybrids. The UI tech it very different. You already have the database stuff, get to know the service side, WCF or web API both fairly straight forward. The target your UI tech.
Personally I went to desktop LOB, but then I got lucky and found a company that valued my experience and gave me a free reign on the tech I could use. Over 15 years I went from VB6 to VB.net in winforms to Silverlight and have moved to WPF where I am very comfortable.
To me the current web stack is a f***ing nightmare and I'm thankful I might be able to retire before it become a requirement.
Just read this[^], avoid EF like the plague, you know how to write a DAL you will be better served using your own.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I very much would like to stay in the Desktop LOB field. It is what I know and understand, in so much as I am good at taking a vague idea from a client and turning it into a stable piece of software that does what they want, or at I was. I love working with SQL Server and could prob make my living as a DB Admin, but I want to get back to creating. Anyway, thanks for the advice and answers so far. I am going to be looking into the books and training links provided so far.
I am kinda wondering if maybe I am overthinking this. Is C#, WPF, a DAL and SQL Server a valid collection of, and I am not sure of the term here, technologies/tools/platforms/frameworks to create a modern desktop application? Is that not leaving to many of the buzzwords I read every day, and mostly don't understand, on the table?
Also, I found the comment to stay away from EF very interesting. I created my own DAL, and wrote a program to generate the code for me from the database schema, in 1998. I have used it in every data accessing program I have created since that time. I would love to update it again and continue to use it, because I know it works. Do modern programmers do that? How important, I wonder, is knowing EF to finding a job in this day and age?
modified 11-Mar-16 23:41pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I started out with VB3 all the way up to VB.NET. Got me a VB5, VB6, VB.NET MCSD with that last on on .NET 1.1 in 2003. Lots of SQL. Similar development story to yours.
In 2007 I moved over to C# exclusively. Previously had code-generated DAL. I went on a mission to improve my development skills and ditched all the code-generation. Probably can still do some code-generation although I don't churn out so much DAL code anymore 
I got stuck into domain-driven design and with find that it really does address proper code and strategic structure. It is *very* difficult to find folks applying domain-driven design and even less doing it correctly. U also ventured into the service bus / messaging space.
My opinion is that web-development is probably going to be the way to go. Once browsers are all up-to-scratch some native mobile apps could possibly be web-based. Always an issue accessing local resources though. I started reading a WPF book years ago and quickly decided that this, along with its second-class citizen sister Silverlight, are going to have a tough time breaking into the mainstream.
What I would regard as my ideal stack / approach would be:
- domain-driven design
- No ORM
- event-sourcing
- service bus
- web-api / rest
- web-based front-end using some MV* technology such as CanJS. I have used Ember and *it* was painful.
I have created some open-source software during this journey:
- service bus: shuttle-esb documentation[^]
- samples: https://github.com/Shuttle/shuttle-esb-samples
- data access: GitHub - Shuttle/shuttle-core-data: Provides a very thin abstraction over ADO.NET.[^]
Hope that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
I, too, am maintaining legacy code in VB 6 for LOB apps.
I have looked @ C#+WPF and have come to the realization that LOB apps don't lend themselves to objectification to the degree required by C#
The other, huge, issue is printing, a task that all the LOB apps I've worked on the last 30 years really need to do.
C# just doesn't have the tools that VB6 does, especially formatting, string placement and printer control.
It also doesn't seem to support all the file access methods of VB6.
And it also doesn't support control arrays!!!
There is a VB6 library (namespace) that comes with VS that allows you to call the VB6 functions from VB.NET, including the printing and file access. So VB in VS might work well for you (if you don't mind the heaviest load of keyboarding I have ever seen - surpassing COBOL by a mile.)
I need to add parenthetically that I generally avoid packaged libraries because I have been badly burned by them. As a result I "roll my own" printing routines. Also, c# seems to rely heavily on 3rd party libraries which is another count against it IMO.
Murray
|
|
|
|
|
You're describing my history, with two differences: I didn't let that much time pass before I made the change, and I never even looked at VB.NET, I went straight to C#, thinking that a different language would help me break with VB6 nastier habits.
I was wrong. Just like you, I was writing good procedural (VB6) code in C#: I didn't understand, so I didn't use OOP, lambdas etc. My advice is that first and foremost, train yourself in OOP thinking. Learn patterns, and apply them. When you have a good understanding of these basic foundations of programming that we could happily ignore in VB6, then you can learn C#, WPF, ASP.NET or whatever else you choose.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here, VB3 to VB6, with other technologies (C, C++, Object/1, database, etc.) interspersed. I shifted to VB.NET for a couple of years around 2002, and then onto C#.
I did some personal research recently, and C# (IMO) is a good choice. Different sites measure in different ways, but all agree that C# has good market share, e.g., there are many jobs available. Microsoft supports it so it's not likely to go away any time soon. Which platform? I suggest you get a primer on all of them, it will help you make an informed choice. Then delve deeper into your chosen one.
Start with Windows Forms programming -- it's the most familiar and you'll make an easier transition. But after that, I agree with the folks that recommended web programming. If you want to be more marketable, that is key.
That said, it sounds like the real problem is getting a handle on OO programming. THAT is the crux.
When I moved to VB4 I shifted into OO mode, er, well, as much as VB allowed. It was good training, thinking in terms of encapsulation. The shift into VB.NET and then C# wasn't that difficult for me, more a matter of training myself to take the lessons farther.
Vaughn, I suggest you get a decent C# book. I like the SAMS series -- I used several of them over the years in different technologies and they are good, basic training that cover a lot of bases in an organized fashion. The lessons are practical and you can see daily improvement. [I also have WROX Professional C# 2008, but I found that one useful as a reference, not as a teaching aid.]
I found the following one on Amazon, not sure it's the most recent, it was published in 2012. Check publication dates -- the original C# book from 2002 is still available, you don't want that one.
Sams Teach Yourself C# 5.0 in 24 Hours: Scott J. Dorman: 9780672336843: Amazon.com: Books[^]
Don't try to learn everything at once. You will overwhelm yourself and kill your own self confidence. Start with Forms programming, then expand your horizons.
Good luck and perseverance!
|
|
|
|
|
CMPerez wrote: My advice is that first and foremost, train yourself in OOP thinking. Learn patterns, and apply them.
Pretty sure, that hits the nail on the head. Now I just need to figure out how to go about learning to think like that.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
I'd say it's their loss. 