|
Agree with Dave. Mention the attacks(SQL injection, DDOS attack, etc.,) briefly & explain the soltuion(s) with more details. Check these articles by @Espen-Harlinn [^] & @JocaPC [^]. I liked both articles very much so picked those for reference.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the links, will have a look! 
|
|
|
|
|
Mmm.. a little comment.. while you were helpful, and Espen Harlin was probably trying to be helpful too I think his communication is extremely bad!
Why?
Well, my first impression from his article is "don't bother with security, you are doing it wrong". With a strong emphasis on "don't bother".
I beg to differ! Personally I think some security is better than none and I will ignore the nay sayers and pursue my quest of knowledge accordingly! 
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's not your cup of tea 
Espen's article almost 3 years old. IIRC I think I have asked him to revise that article with more things.
Believe me, that article triggered me to research on many things related to security[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I like the second article much more!
I was thinking to expand some more on the same ideas!...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ho... gimme some time! 
|
|
|
|
|
I was looking through a NuGet package for Rx-Aliases and found that it references a type called IQbservable. I initially thought it was a weird bug in the generator (the file is generated by a tool), but then found this page[^] on MSDN.
So, is Qservable (Queryable Observable) a word now?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I can't spell. Especially made up words.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Surely all words are made up?
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
The Rx library was written by ducks. Is aculy Quack Observable. aculy wrtn bi Dolan. y he do dis[^]
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sci News is reporting that astronomers at the University of New South Wales have discovered an Earthlike planet just 16 light-years away.
Clickity[^]
[edit] I wonder if that means they like bacon? [/edit]
If first you don't succeed, hide all evidence you ever tried!
modified 30-Jun-14 17:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Do they have QA?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: astronomers at the University of New South Wales have discovered an Earthlike planet just 16 light-years away
No they haven't.
What they've "seen" is a wibble in some part of the electromagnetic spectrum, probably caused either by someone's cellphone as they twatted about what came out of their anus after their liquid lunch, or by sentient interstellar dust clouds performing rabbit silhouettes to pacify their noisy kids*.
Getting really sick of all this "WE'VE DISCOVERED YET ANOTHER PLANET!!!" BS, now.
* The probability of either of those options being true is actually higher than the probability of a planet having been discovered.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
They are planning to send a man and a sheep to settle.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure there are already plenty of sheep around Settle
Clicky[^]
Regards, Stewart
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: They are planning to send a man and a sheep to settle.
If they send the ![Sheep | [baah]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/sheep.gif) the men will follow. 
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: [edit] I wonder if that means they like bacon? [/edit]
It is the office NASA definition of intelligent life (or at least it should be)
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Why is it that for years now Microsoft has been saying windows has gone to a consecutive roll out plan from now on, did everyone miss this?
First comes 8
Then 8.1
Then 8.2
Then 8.3
Windows 8 brings in a paradigm shift, metro is the .net framework, and the desktop is compatibility mode.
The concept of windows 8 is to bring the world slowly into windows 9 which does not have the desktop.
Windows 9 is nothing like windows 7.
|
|
|
|
|
Colborne_Greg wrote: Windows 9 is nothing like windows 7.
Not according to Mary Jo[^]
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Not according to some Mary chick or "according to my sources." she says - which is not Microsoft.
|
|
|
|
|
Ummmm.... most of Mary Jo's sources are inside Microsoft or very closely related (very large developers who get pre-release information). She's not always 100% accurate but she's way more accurate than some random guy on an online forum (cough... cough...).
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
The consecutive roll out was taught in class from my teacher who works for Microsoft training me to work for Microsoft. When someone is wrong about news you should stop listening to them.
|
|
|
|
|
If he works at Microsoft, he'd be under non-disclosure. As for the update; not having more consistent roll-up updates was a big mistake in XP and Windows 7. Everything I've read indicates that Windows 9 is still on schedule for April 2015.
BTW, all that said, I think Microsoft is now changing version numbers too fast! The Visual Studio situation is especially annoying.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
