|
Knowledgestudent wrote: There is always something to learn
Elephants, because bananas don't have bones.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,
i have a doubt regarding assembly version.
How can i know the assembly get generated using which version of .net framework
how can i identify
using which version of .net framework(1.1 or 2.0) the assembly generated
please revert me for any clarrification
Thanks
sri
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
mukkanti007 wrote: How can i know the assembly get generated using which version of .net framework
Assuming you know there is actually Assembly class in .NET Framework, good place to start is documentation for this class. Maybe there is some method how to get what you want?
Surprisingy (not), there is one: Assembly.ImageRuntimeVersion[^]
[ My Blog] "Visual studio desperately needs some performance improvements. It is sometimes almost as slow as eclipse." - Rüdiger Klaehn "Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all:
I was ask about any idea let me secure infromation transmission over IP packet using .net
|
|
|
|
|
For starters, read up on the Cryptography namespace 
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
not cryptic enough for you?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: not cryptic enough for you?
Naaaah 
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
aminnhs86 wrote: was ask about any idea let me secure infromation transmission over IP packet using .net
Did you post any HTML without selecting 'Ignore HTML tags in this message?'. There is a huge chunk of blank space in your message.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
Yesterday is a canceled check. Tomorrow is a promissory note. Today is the ready cash. USE IT.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
I have some classes developed using VS 2005. Now I have to use them in a project developed using VS 2003. What type of project should I make for these classes (VS05) , i.e. Web Service, .Net remoting service, or some other to properly use them with VS 03 project?
Note: I can't compile these classes in VS 2003 as they reference some assemblies built using .Net frame work 2.0.
best regards,
Cyber Friend
|
|
|
|
|
A Web Service should work, as long as the return type for your methods is supported by .NET 1.1.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
Thanx for the reply Pual, but problem is that I will not have IIS server installed on my machine which I will run my project on. So I think web service is not the proper solution.
What do you say about it?
best regards,
Cyber Friend
|
|
|
|
|
Cyber Friend wrote: So I think web service is not the proper solution.
You're the one who suggested it.
I don't know about .NET remoting as I haven't used it. I don't believe you can directly reference a .NET 2.0 DLL from a .NET 1.1 app. Only 1 version of the framework is loaded per process. If your app runs under .NET 1.1, it won't be able to run the code in the .NET 2.0 assemblies.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
hello all...
An application built on C#.net2.0,i m running this application Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with Sp2..The Application some Times Stops responding
and disappears(Close) during running..can any one plz tel me actual solution or cause of this problem..!
an urgent reply will be appreciated..
zshan
|
|
|
|
|
Cross post. Please ignore this thread.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea Pete.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I thought I'd try something a bit more positive out.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Hy!
I have installed Net Framework 3 and it not appear in Visual Studio 2005->Help->About and when I want to create a new project nothing is new, all from version 2.
Have anybody any idea?
thx
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK .NET 3.0 does not replace anything from 2.0, it just adds to it.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
That's the way it's supposed to be. .NET 3.0 is really .NET 2.0 + some extensions, like WCF, CardSpace, WPF, ... That's why it shows up as .NET Framework 2.0 in the About box.
|
|
|
|
|
ok. But I doanloaded a project with WPF and Visual Studio tell me that it can't loaded it. Why? The project is http://www.codeproject.com/WPF/GuidedTourWPF_1.asp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, how do I make a control ALWAYS show up in the toolbox without having to drag/drop for each project that might use it?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Right click on your toolbox and select Add a tab. Give it whatever name you want. Then right click in the tab and choose Add items... from the menu. Then you can choose the controls you want to store in the toolbox.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, didn't work. I can see it in the toolbox only when I have the solution open in which it was added.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. It works for me.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
